Application of n-of-1 Clinical Trials in Personalized Nutrition Research: A Trial Protocol for Westlake N-of-1 Trials for Macronutrient Intake (WE-MACNUTR)

Yunyi Tian, Yue Ma, Yuanqing Fu, Ju-Sheng Zheng, Yunyi Tian, Yue Ma, Yuanqing Fu, Ju-Sheng Zheng

Abstract

Personalized dietary recommendations can help with more effective disease prevention. This study aims to investigate the individual postprandial glucose response to diets with diverse macronutrient proportions at both the individual level and population level, and explore the potential of the novel single-patient (n-of-1) trial for personalization of diet. Secondary outcomes include individual phenotypic responses and the effects of dietary ingredients on the composition of gut microbiota. Westlake N-of-1 Trials for Macronutrient Intake is a multiple crossover feeding trial consisting of 3 successive 12-d dietary intervention pairs including a 6-d washout period before each 6-d isocaloric dietary intervention: a 6-d high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet, and a 6-d low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet. The results will help provide personalized dietary recommendations for macronutrients in terms of postprandial blood glucose responses. The proposed n-of-1 trial methods could help in optimizing individual health and advancing health care. This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04125602).

Keywords: dietary intervention; gut microbiome; high-fat diet; low-carbohydrate diet; n-of-1; personalized nutrition; postprandial blood glucose; single patient trial.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The development of personalized nutrition. Personalized nutrition was born in the context that a conventional “one-size-fits-all” approach usually fails to meet an individual's nutritional requirements. An “n-of-1” clinical trial is a novel study design for the investigation of personalized nutrition, contrasting with traditional designs such as the observational study or randomized controlled trial. Integration of multiomics data, including nutrigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiome, and other phenotypes, is key for the development of personalized nutrition.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow diagram of the Westlake N-of-1 Trials for Macronutrient Intake (WE-MACNUTR) trial. The flowchart summarizes the preparation phase and Set 1 of the trial. Sets 2 and 3 share the same trial design as Set 1 except for no blood sample collection for washout or intervention period. The sequence of 2 types of 6-d dietary interventions in each set is randomized using a block randomization as LF-HC and HF-LC diets in Set 1; HF-LC and LF-HC diets in Set 2; and HF-LC and LF-HC diets in Set 3. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; GI, gastrointestinal; HF-LC, high-fat, low-carbohydrate; LF-HC, low-fat, high-carbohydrate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The timeline of the Westlake N-of-1 Trials for Macronutrient Intake (WE-MACNUTR) trial. The timeline illustrates a preparation period for participant recruitment, a baseline data collection period, and 3 feeding trial periods. The first set of the trial consists of 2 washout periods (highlighted in gray) and 2 randomized dietary intervention periods (highlighted in green). In all 3 sets of the trial, both washout and intervention periods last for 6 d.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Representation of the hierarchical Bayesian estimation for the primary outcomes at both individual and population level (a combination of single-patient studies). The observed repeated measurements of the peak postprandial glucose concentrations for a given patient are combined into a sample mean and a sample variance. The model assumes that the patient's measurements follow a normal distribution centered about that patient's true mean effect (μi) with variance σ12. At the population level, the various patients’ true means (μi) are assumed to follow a normal distribution centered about an overall population mean (μ0) with between-patient variance τ2. For the Bayesian specification, prior distributions are assigned for β, μ0, σ12, and τ2. In the present study, these prior distributions are standard noninformative prior distributions. X represents the independent variable: dietary patterns (high-fat and low-carbohydrate compared with low-fat and high-carbohydrate). Secondary and exploratory outcomes will be analyzed similarly. PMG, postprandial maximum glucose.

References

    1. Tay J, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Thompson CH, Noakes M, Buckley JD, Wittert GA, Yancy WS Jr, Brinkworth GD. Comparison of low- and high-carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes management: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):780–90.
    1. Tay J, Thompson CH, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Wycherley TP, Noakes M, Buckley JD, Wittert GA, Yancy WS Jr, Brinkworth GD. Effects of an energy-restricted low-carbohydrate, high unsaturated fat/low saturated fat diet versus a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet in type 2 diabetes: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(4):858–71.
    1. Kdekian A, Alssema M, Van Der Beek EM, Greyling A, Vermeer MA, Mela DJ, Trautwein EA. Impact of isocaloric exchanges of carbohydrate for fat on postprandial glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and free fatty acid responses—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(1):1–8.
    1. Accurso A, Bernstein RK, Dahlqvist A, Draznin B, Feinman RD, Fine EJ, Gleed A, Jacobs DB, Larson G, Lustig RH et al. . Dietary carbohydrate restriction in type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Nutr Metab. 2008;5:9.
    1. Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yachi Y, Sato M, Sugawara A, Totsuka K, Shimano H, Ohashi Y et al. . Influence of fat and carbohydrate proportions on the metabolic profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(5):959–65.
    1. Noakes TD, Windt J. Evidence that supports the prescription of low-carbohydrate high-fat diets: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(2):133–9.
    1. Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S. Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2261–7.
    1. Saslow LR, Mason AE, Kim S, Goldman V, Ploutz-Snyder R, Bayandorian H, Daubenmier J, Hecht FM, Moskowitz JT. An online intervention comparing a very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and lifestyle recommendations versus a plate method diet in overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(2):e36.
    1. Bhanpuri NH, Hallberg SJ, Williams PT, McKenzie AL, Ballard KD, Campbell WW, McCarter JP, Phinney SD, Volek JS. Cardiovascular disease risk factor responses to a type 2 diabetes care model including nutritional ketosis induced by sustained carbohydrate restriction at 1 year: an open label, non-randomized, controlled study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):56.
    1. Wylie-Rosett J, Aebersold K, Conlon B, Isasi CR, Ostrovsky NW. Health effects of low-carbohydrate diets: where should new research go?. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(2):271–8.
    1. Braconi D, Cicaloni V, Spiga O, Santucci A. An introduction to personalized nutrition. In: Galanakis CM.editor. Trends in personalized nutrition. Academic Press;2019. p. 3–32.
    1. Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;361:k2173.
    1. German JB, Zivkovic AM, Dallas DC, Smilowitz JT. Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: what will they mean for food?. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2011;2:97–123.
    1. Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ. [Internet]2018;361:k2179 doi:10.1136/bmj.k2179.
    1. Fito M, Melander O, Martinez JA, Toledo E, Carpene C, Corella D. Advances in integrating traditional and omic biomarkers when analyzing the effects of the Mediterranean diet intervention in cardiovascular prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(9):1469.
    1. Schork NJ, Goetz LH. Single-subject studies in translational nutrition research. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:395–422.
    1. McDonald S, Quinn F, Vieira R, O'Brien N, White M, Johnston DW, Sniehotta FF. The state of the art and future opportunities for using longitudinal n-of-1 methods in health behaviour research: a systematic literature overview. Health Psychol Rev. 2017;11(4):307–23.
    1. Duan N, Kravitz RL, Schmid CH. Single-patient (n-of-1) trials: a pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(Suppl 8):S21–8.
    1. Kravitz RL, Schmid CH, Marois M, Wilsey B, Ward D, Hays RD, Duan N, Wang Y, MacDonald S, Jerant A et al. . Effect of mobile device-supported single-patient multi-crossover trials on treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(10):1368–77.
    1. Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine?. Per Med. 2011;8(2):161–73.
    1. Senior HE, Mitchell GK, Nikles J, Carmont SA, Schluter PJ, Currow DC, Vora R, Yelland MJ, Agar M, Good PD. Using aggregated single patient (N-of-1) trials to determine the effectiveness of psychostimulants to reduce fatigue in advanced cancer patients: a rationale and protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12(1):17.
    1. Moeller JD, Dattilo J, Rusch F. Applying quality indicators to single-case research designs used in special education: a systematic review. Psychol Sch. 2015;52(2):139–53.
    1. Norcross JC, Wampold BE. What works for whom: tailoring psychotherapy to the person. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67(2):127–32.
    1. Stunnenberg BC, Raaphorst J, Groenewoud HM, Statland JM, Griggs RC, Woertman W, Stegeman DF, Timmermans J, Trivedi J, Matthews E et al. . Effect of mexiletine on muscle stiffness in patients with nondystrophic myotonia evaluated using aggregated N-of-1 trials. JAMA. 2018;320(22):2344–53.
    1. Zucker DR, Ruthazer R, Schmid CH, Feuer JM, Fischer PA, Kieval RI, Mogavero N, Rapoport RJ, Selker HP, Stotsky SA et al. . Lessons learned combining N-of-1 trials to assess fibromyalgia therapies. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(10):2069–77.
    1. Parr EB, Devlin BL, Callahan MJ, Radford BE, Blankenship JM, Dunstan DW, Hawley JA. Effects of providing high-fat versus high-carbohydrate meals on daily and postprandial physical activity and glucose patterns: a randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(5):557.
    1. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA et al. . Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559–63.
    1. Berry SE, Valdes AM, Drew DA, Asnicar F, Mazidi M, Wolf J, Capdevila J, Hadjigeorgiou G, Davies R, Al Khatib H et al. . Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):964–73.
    1. Spector TD, Gardner CD. Challenges and opportunities for better nutrition science. BMJ. 2020;369:m2470.
    1. The Chinese Nutrition Society Chinese dietary guidelines. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2016.
    1. The Chinese Nutrition Society Chinese dietary reference intakes. Beijing: China Light Industry Press; 2013.
    1. Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(11):1621–30.
    1. Kravitz RL, Duan N; DEcIDE Methods Center N-of-1 Guidance Panel . Design and implementation of N-of-1 trials: a user's guide. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
    1. Chan CL, Pyle L, Newnes L, Nadeau KJ, Zeitler PS, Kelsey MM. Continuous glucose monitoring and its relationship to hemoglobin A1c and oral glucose tolerance testing in obese and prediabetic youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):902–10.
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group Variation of interstitial glucose measurements assessed by continuous glucose monitors in healthy, nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1297–9.
    1. Zucker DR, Schmid CH, McIntosh MW, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP, Lau J. Combining single patient (N-of-1) trials to estimate population treatment effects and to evaluate individual patient responses to treatment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(4):401–10.
    1. McGlothlin AE, Viele K. Bayesian hierarchical models. JAMA. 2018;320(22):2365–6.
    1. Jung CH, Choi KM. Impact of high-carbohydrate diet on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):322.
    1. American Diabetes Association Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(Suppl 1):S61–78.
    1. Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, Bernstein RK, Fine EJ, Westman EC, Accurso A, Frassetto L, Gower BA, McFarlane SI et al. . Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015;31(1):1–13.
    1. Santos FL, Esteves SS, da Costa Pereira A, Yancy WS Jr, Nunes JP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of the effects of low carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Rev. 2012;13(11):1048–66.
    1. Hsu WC, Lau KH, Matsumoto M, Moghazy D, Keenan H, King GL. Improvement of insulin sensitivity by isoenergy high carbohydrate traditional Asian diet: a randomized controlled pilot feasibility study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106851.
    1. Kamada C, Yoshimura H, Okumura R, Takahashi K, Iimuro S, Ohashi Y, Araki A, Umegaki H, Sakurai T, Yoshimura Y et al. . Optimal energy distribution of carbohydrate intake for Japanese elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: the Japanese Elderly Intervention Trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(Suppl 1):41–9.
    1. Naude CE, Schoonees A, Senekal M, Young T, Garner P, Volmink J. Low carbohydrate versus isoenergetic balanced diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e100652.
    1. Hockaday TD, Hockaday JM, Mann JI, Turner RC. Prospective comparison of modified fat-high-carbohydrate with standard low-carbohydrate dietary advice in the treatment of diabetes: one year follow-up study. Br J Nutr. 1978;39(2):357–62.
    1. Schulze MB, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Fung TT, Lichtenstein AH, Forouhi NG. Food based dietary patterns and chronic disease prevention. BMJ. 2018;361:k2396.
    1. Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, Mujagic Z, Vila AV, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 2016;352(6285):565–9.
    1. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Macready AL, Fallaize R, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C, Forster H, Walsh MC, Navas-Carretero S et al. . Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):578–88.
    1. Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489(7415):242–9.
    1. Cani PD. Human gut microbiome: hopes, threats and promises. Gut. 2018;67(9):1716–25.
    1. Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, Ben-Yacov O, Lador D, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell. 2015;163(5):1079–94.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel