Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident acute myocardial infarction and stroke: findings from matched cohort study of 18 million European adults

Myriam Alexander, A Katrina Loomis, Johan van der Lei, Talita Duarte-Salles, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, David Ansell, Alessandro Pasqua, Francesco Lapi, Peter Rijnbeek, Mees Mosseveld, Paul Avillach, Peter Egger, Nafeesa N Dhalwani, Stuart Kendrick, Carlos Celis-Morales, Dawn M Waterworth, William Alazawi, Naveed Sattar, Myriam Alexander, A Katrina Loomis, Johan van der Lei, Talita Duarte-Salles, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, David Ansell, Alessandro Pasqua, Francesco Lapi, Peter Rijnbeek, Mees Mosseveld, Paul Avillach, Peter Egger, Nafeesa N Dhalwani, Stuart Kendrick, Carlos Celis-Morales, Dawn M Waterworth, William Alazawi, Naveed Sattar

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or stroke in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Design: Matched cohort study.

Setting: Population based, electronic primary healthcare databases before 31 December 2015 from four European countries: Italy (n=1 542 672), Netherlands (n=2 225 925), Spain (n=5 488 397), and UK (n=12 695 046).

Participants: 120 795 adults with a recorded diagnosis of NAFLD or NASH and no other liver diseases, matched at time of NAFLD diagnosis (index date) by age, sex, practice site, and visit, recorded at six months before or after the date of diagnosis, with up to 100 patients without NAFLD or NASH in the same database.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was incident fatal or non-fatal AMI and ischaemic or unspecified stroke. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox models and pooled across databases by random effect meta-analyses.

Results: 120 795 patients with recorded NAFLD or NASH diagnoses were identified with mean follow-up 2.1-5.5 years. After adjustment for age and smoking the pooled hazard ratio for AMI was 1.17 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.30; 1035 events in participants with NAFLD or NASH, 67 823 in matched controls). In a group with more complete data on risk factors (86 098 NAFLD and 4 664 988 matched controls), the hazard ratio for AMI after adjustment for systolic blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension was 1.01 (0.91 to 1.12; 747 events in participants with NAFLD or NASH, 37 462 in matched controls). After adjustment for age and smoking status the pooled hazard ratio for stroke was 1.18 (1.11 to 1.24; 2187 events in participants with NAFLD or NASH, 134 001 in matched controls). In the group with more complete data on risk factors, the hazard ratio for stroke was 1.04 (0.99 to 1.09; 1666 events in participants with NAFLD, 83 882 in matched controls) after further adjustment for type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension.

Conclusions: The diagnosis of NAFLD in current routine care of 17.7 million patient appears not to be associated with AMI or stroke risk after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovascular risk assessment in adults with a diagnosis of NAFLD is important but should be done in the same way as for the general population.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: MA reports being contracted by SRG to work for GlaxoSmithKline and received a salary from GSK, including bonus. JF-B and DW are paid employees at GlaxoSmithKline and receive salaries, including bonuses. AKL is a paid employee at Pfizer and receives a salary, including bonus. DP-A reports unrestricted research grants from UCB, Amgen, and Servier, and consultancy fees from UCB Pharma paid to his department. DA reports as a paid employee of IQVIA has provided consultancy and advice to many pharmaceutical companies on undertaking outcomes studies using real world evidence. PE and SK report they are paid employees and stock holders of GlaxoSmithKline. NS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Janssen, and Sanofi and a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. WA reports consultancy and sponsored lectures from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept IQVIA, and UCB Pharma.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for acute myocardial infarction in participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Data for age, sex, and smoking status were available for 120 795 participants with NAFLD and 9 647 644 matched participants without NAFLD. *Subset analyses were restricted to participants with data for age, smoking status, type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension (86 098 participants with NAFLD and 4 664 988 matched controls, respectively). Analyses were progressively adjusted for age, smoking status, type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension. Weights are from random effect meta-analysis and are inversely proportional to the variance of the estimated hazard ratios (therefore proportional to the number of events contributing the hazard ratios). Statin use in The Health Improvement Network (THIN, United Kingdom) was missing and therefore imputed. HSD=Health Search Database (Italy); IPCI=Integrated Primary Care Information (Netherlands); SIDIAP=Information System for Research in Primary Care (Spain); P-het=P value for heterogeneity
Fig 2
Fig 2
Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for stroke in participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Data for age, sex, and smoking status were available for 120 795 participants with NAFLD and 9 647 644 matched participants without NAFLD. *Subset analyses were restricted to participants with data for age, smoking status, type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension (86 098 NAFLD and 4 664 988 matched controls, respectively). Analyses were progressively adjusted for age, smoking status, type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, statin use, and hypertension. Weights are from random effect meta-analysis and are inversely proportional to the variance of the estimated hazard ratios (therefore proportional to the number of events contributing the hazard ratios). Statin use in The Health Improvement Network (THIN, United Kingdom) was missing and therefore imputed. HSD=Health Search Database (Italy); IPCI=Integrated Primary Care Information (Netherlands); SIDIAP=Information System for Research in Primary Care (Spain); P-het=P value for heterogeneity

References

    1. Targher G, Day CP, Bonora E. Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1341-50. 10.1056/NEJMra0912063.
    1. Bhatia LS, Curzen NP, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a new and important cardiovascular risk factor? Eur Heart J 2012;33:1190-200. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr453.
    1. Mellinger JL, Pencina KM, Massaro JM, et al. Hepatic steatosis and cardiovascular disease outcomes: An analysis of the Framingham Heart Study. J Hepatol 2015;63:470-6. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.045.
    1. Salvi P, Ruffini R, Agnoletti D, et al. Increased arterial stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Cardio-GOOSE study. J Hypertens 2010;28:1699-707. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833a7de6.
    1. Lee Y-J, Shim J-Y, Moon B-S, et al. The relationship between arterial stiffness and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57:196-203. 10.1007/s10620-011-1819-3.
    1. Cai J, Zhang S, Huang W. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and carotid atherosclerosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:7673-8.
    1. Sookoian S, Pirola CJ. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is strongly associated with carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review. J Hepatol 2008;49:600-7. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.06.012.
    1. Ong JP, Pitts A, Younossi ZM. Increased overall mortality and liver-related mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2008;49:608-12. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.06.018.
    1. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med 2011;43:617-49. 10.3109/07853890.2010.518623.
    1. Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A, Zoppini G, Barbui C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2016;65:589-600. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.013.
    1. Ghouri N, Preiss D, Sattar N. Liver enzymes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and incident cardiovascular disease: a narrative review and clinical perspective of prospective data. Hepatology 2010;52:1156-61. 10.1002/hep.23789.
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ 2008;336:1475-82. 10.1136/bmj.39609.449676.25.
    1. Gini R, Francesconi P, Mazzaglia G, et al. Chronic disease prevalence from Italian administrative databases in the VALORE project: a validation through comparison of population estimates with general practice databases and national survey. BMC Public Health 2013;13:15. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-15.
    1. Vlug AE, van der Lei J, Mosseveld BM, et al. Postmarketing surveillance based on electronic patient records: the IPCI project. Methods Inf Med 1999;38:339-44. 10.1055/s-0038-1634402
    1. García-Gil MdelM, Hermosilla E, Prieto-Alhambra D, et al. Construction and validation of a scoring system for the selection of high-quality data in a Spanish population primary care database (SIDIAP). Inform Prim Care 2011;19:135-45.
    1. Blak BT, Thompson M, Dattani H, Bourke A. Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Inform Prim Care 2011;19:251-5.
    1. Alexander M, Loomis AK, Fairburn-Beech J, et al. Real-world data reveal a diagnostic gap in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med 2018;16:130. 10.1186/s12916-018-1103-x.
    1. Avillach P, Coloma PM, Gini R, et al. EU-ADR consortium Harmonization process for the identification of medical events in eight European healthcare databases: the experience from the EU-ADR project. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:184-92. 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000933.
    1. Strong M, Maheswaran R, Pearson T. A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation. Int J Health Geogr 2006;5:29. 10.1186/1476-072X-5-29.
    1. Whitehead A. Meta-Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002, 10.1002/0470854200.
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58. 10.1002/sim.1186.
    1. Vistisen D, Witte DR, Brunner EJ, et al. Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Death in Individuals With Prediabetes Defined by Different Criteria: The Whitehall II Study. Diabetes Care 2018;41:899-906. 10.2337/dc17-2530.
    1. Coloma PM, Valkhoff VE, Mazzaglia G, et al. EU-ADR Consortium Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: a validation study in three European countries. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002862. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002862.
    1. Tang KL, Rashid R, Godley J, Ghali WA. Association between subjective social status and cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010137. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010137.
    1. Woodward M, Brindle P, Tunstall-Pedoe H, SIGN group on risk estimation Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC). Heart 2007;93:172-6. 10.1136/hrt.2006.108167.
    1. JBS3 Board Joint British Societies’ consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Heart 2014;100(Suppl 2):ii1-67. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305693.
    1. Alazawi W, Mathur R, Abeysekera K, et al. Ethnicity and the diagnosis gap in liver disease: a population-based study. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64:e694-702. 10.3399/bjgp14X682273.
    1. Wood AM, Kaptoge S, Butterworth AS, et al. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration/EPIC-CVD/UK Biobank Alcohol Study Group Risk thresholds for alcohol consumption: combined analysis of individual-participant data for 599 912 current drinkers in 83 prospective studies. Lancet 2018;391:1513-23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30134-X.
    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64:73-84. 10.1002/hep.28431.
    1. van Asten M, Verhaegh P, Jonkers D, et al. A survey on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease amongst general practitioners: time to bridge the gap between hepatologists and primary care. J Hepatol 2017;66:S411 10.1016/S0168-8278(17)31181-9.
    1. Sheridan DA, Aithal G, Alazawi W, et al. Care standards for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the United Kingdom 2016: a cross-sectional survey. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017;8:252-9. 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100806.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel