Individual differences in striatum activity to food commercials predict weight gain in adolescents

Sonja Yokum, Ashley N Gearhardt, Jennifer L Harris, Kelly D Brownell, Eric Stice, Sonja Yokum, Ashley N Gearhardt, Jennifer L Harris, Kelly D Brownell, Eric Stice

Abstract

Objective: Adolescents view thousands of food commercials annually, but little is known about how individual differences in neural response to food commercials relate to weight gain. To add to our understanding of individual risk factors for unhealthy weight gain and environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic, we tested the associations between reward region (striatum and orbitofrontal cortex [OFC]) responsivity to food commercials and future change in body mass index (BMI).

Methods: Adolescents (N = 30) underwent a scan session at baseline while watching a television show edited to include 20 food commercials and 20 nonfood commercials. BMI was measured at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

Results: Activation in the striatum, but not OFC, in response to food commercials relative to nonfood commercials and in response to food commercials relative to the television show was positively associated with change in BMI over 1-year follow-up. Baseline BMI did not moderate these effects.

Conclusions: The results suggest that there are individual differences in neural susceptibility to food advertising. These findings highlight a potential mechanism for the impact of food marketing on adolescent obesity.

© 2014 The Obesity Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction of the identified ROIs for A) striatum and B) orbitofrontal cortex.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Partial regression plots showing the positive associations between A) BOLD response in the caudate in response to food commercials > non-food commercials and B) BOLD response in the caudate in response to food commercials > television show and increases in BMI over 1-year follow-up, while controlling for baseline BMI.

References

    1. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity Trends in television food advertising to young people: 2013 update. 2014.
    1. Powell LM, Schermbeck RM, Szczypka G, Chaloupka FJ, Braunschweig CL. Trends in the nutritional content of television food advertisements seen by children in the United States: analyses by age, food categories, and companies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:1078–1086.
    1. Federal Trade Commision A review of food marketing to children and adolescents: follow-up report. 2012.
    1. Andreyeva T, Kelly IR, Harris JL. Exposure to food advertising on television: associations with children's fast food and soft drink consumption and obesity. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9:221–233.
    1. World Health Organization Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. 2010 Retrieved from .
    1. Zimmerman FJ, Bell JF. Associations of television content type and obesity in children. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:334–340.
    1. Bruce AS, Lepping RJ, Bruce JM, Cherry JB, Martin LE, Davis AM, et al. Brain responses to food logos in obese and healthy weight children. J Pediatr. 2013;162:759–764. e2.
    1. Bruce AS, Holsen LM, Chambers RJ, Martin LE, Brooks WM, Zarcone JR, et al. Obese children show hyperactivation to food pictures in brain networks linked to motivation, reward and cognitive control. Int J Obes. 2010;34:1494–1500.
    1. Burger KS, Stice E. Neural responsivity during soft drink intake, anticipation, and advertisement exposure in habitually consuming youth. Obesity. 2014;22:441–450.
    1. Gearhardt AN, Yokum S, Stice E, Harris JL, Brownell KD. Relation of obesity to neural activation in response to food commercials. SCAN. 2013
    1. Demos KE, Heatherton TF, Kelley WM. Individual differences in nucleus accumbens activity to food and sexual images predict weight gain and sexual behavior. J Neurosci. 2012;32:5549–5552.
    1. Stice E, Yokum S, Bohon C, Marti N, Smolen A. Reward circuitry responsivity to food predicts future increases in body mass: moderating effects of DRD2 and DRD4. Neuroimage. 2010;50:1618–1625.
    1. García-García I, Naberhaus A, Margués-Iturria I, Garolera M, Rădoi A, Sequra B, Jurado B. Neural response to visual food cues: insights from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2013;21:89–98.
    1. Bonat S, Pathomvanich A, Keil MF, Field AE, Yanovski JA. Self-assessment of pubertal stage in overweight children. Pediatrics. 2002;110:743–747.
    1. Block G, Hartman AM, Naughton D. A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation. Epidemiology. 1990;1:58–64.
    1. Siep N, Roefs A, Roebroeck A, Havermans R, Bonte ML, Jansen A. Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2009;198:149–158.
    1. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1233–1239.
    1. Neto LL, Oliveira E, Correia F, Ferreira AG. The human nucleus accumbens: where is it? A stereotactic, anatomical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuromodulation. 2008;11:13–22.
    1. Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd Ed Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; New Jersey: 2003.
    1. Jeličić H, Phelps E, Lerner RM. Use of missing data methods in longitudinal studies: the persistence of bad practices in development psychology. Dev Psychol. 2009;45:1195–1199.
    1. Salbe A, Weyer C, Lindsay R, Ravussin E, Tataranni A. Assessing risk factors for obesity between childhood and adolescence: I. Birth weight, childhood adiposity, parental obesity, insulin, and leptin. Pediatrics. 2002;110:299–306.
    1. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:869–873.
    1. Berridge KC, Ho CY, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG. The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res. 2010;1350:43–64.
    1. Bartra O, McGuire JT, Kable JW. The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage. 2013;76:412–427.
    1. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Baler RD. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obes Rev. 2013;14:2–18.
    1. DiFeliceantonio AG, Mabrouk OS, Kennedy RT, Berridge KC. Enkephalin surges in dorsal neostriatum as a signal to eat. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1918–1924.
    1. Nikolova YS, Ferrell RE, Manuck SB, Hariri AR. Multilocus genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts ventral striatum reactivity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1940–1947.
    1. Stice E, Yokum S, Burger K, Epstein L, Smolen A. Multilocus genetic composite reflecting dopamine signaling capacity predicts reward circuitry responsivity. J Neurosci. 2012;32:10093–10100.
    1. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 1997;275:1593–1599.
    1. Spaniol J, Davidson PS, Kim AS, Han H, Moscovitch M, Grady CL. Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:1765–1779.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel