Computed tomography texture-based radiomics analysis in gallbladder cancer: initial experience

Pankaj Gupta, Pratyaksha Rana, Balaji Ganeshan, Daneshwari Kalage, Santosh Irrinki, Vikas Gupta, Thakur Deen Yadav, Rajender Kumar, Chandan K Das, Parikshaa Gupta, Raymond Endozo, Ritambhra Nada, Radhika Srinivasan, Naveen Kalra, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Sandhu, Pankaj Gupta, Pratyaksha Rana, Balaji Ganeshan, Daneshwari Kalage, Santosh Irrinki, Vikas Gupta, Thakur Deen Yadav, Rajender Kumar, Chandan K Das, Parikshaa Gupta, Raymond Endozo, Ritambhra Nada, Radhika Srinivasan, Naveen Kalra, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Sandhu

Abstract

Aim of the study: To investigate computed tomography (CT) texture parameters in suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC) and assess its utility in predicting histopathological grade and overall survival.

Material and methods: This retrospective pilot study included consecutive patients with clinically suspected GBC. CT images, clinical, and histological or cytological data were retrieved from the database. CT images were reviewed by two radiologists. A single axial CT section in the portal venous phase was selected for texture analysis. Radiomic feature extraction was done using commercially available research software.

Results: Thirty-eight patients (31 females, mean age 53.1 years) were included. Malignancy was confirmed in 29 patients in histopathology or cytology analysis, and the rest had no features of malignancy. Exophytic gallbladder mass with associated gallbladder wall thickening was present in 22 (58%) patients. Lymph nodal, liver, and omental metastases were present in 10, 1, and 3 patients, respectively. The mean overall survival was 9.7 months. There were significant differences in mean and kurtosis at medium texture scales to differentiate moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p < 0.05). The only texture parameter that was significantly associated with survival was kurtosis (p = 0.020) at medium texture scales. In multivariate analysis, factors found to be significantly associated with length of overall survival were mean number of positive pixels (p = 0.02), skewness (p = -0.046), kurtosis (0.018), and standard deviation (p = 0.045).

Conclusions: Our preliminary results highlight the potential utility of CT texture-based radiomics analysis in patients with GBC. Medium texture scale parameters including both mean and kurtosis, or kurtosis alone, may help predict the histological grade and survival, respectively.

Keywords: CT texture analysis; cancer; gallbladder; histology; radiomics.

Copyright © 2021 Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contrast enhanced axial CT image of a female patient with pathologically proven gallbladder cancer with texture features. A) CT image showing region of interest drawn around tumour (blue line) and corresponding images of fine, medium, and coarse textures. B) Histogram derived from image showing pixel distribution at filter value of 2 mm. C) Table of texture parameters across the different SSF values: 0 – conventional, 2 mm – fine texture scale, 3-5 mm – medium texture scales, and 6 mm – coarse texture scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of patient recruitment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Morphological types of gallbladder cancer. Axial contrast CT images depict asymmetric gallbladder wall thickening at fundus with associated exophytic mass in segment IV of liver (A, white arrow), heterogenous intraluminal polypoidal lesion ~ 2.5 cm in maximum dimension (B, white arrow) and heterogenous attenuation mass in gallbladder fossa with gallbladder not separately visualized (C, white arrow). D shows heterogenous exophytic mass with multiple calcific foci within (white arrow). All the above lesions were pathologically proven adenocarcinoma with good differentiation (B), moderate differentiation (C) and not otherwise specified (A, D), respectively, histological grades. Note is made of a periportal lymph node (arrowhead), with a CBD stent anterior to it (A)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Boxplots showing the trends in the mean value at SSF3 and 4 (A, B) and kurtosis at SSF4 and 5 (C, D)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant difference in overall survival for (A) kurtosis at SSF = 4 and (B) kurtosis at SSF = 5

References

    1. Dwivedi AN, Jain S, Dixit R. Gall bladder carcinoma: Aggressive malignancy with protean loco-regional and distant spread. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3: 231-244.
    1. Unisa S, Jagannath P, Dhir V, et al. . Population-based study to estimate prevalence and determine risk factors of gallbladder diseases in the rural Gangetic basin of North India. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13: 117-125.
    1. Dutta U, Bush N, Kalsi D, et al. . Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in India. Chin Clin Oncol 2019; 8: 33.
    1. Wang JH, Liu BJ, Xu HX, et al. . Clinical, pathological and sonographic characteristics of unexpected gallbladder carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 11109-11116.
    1. Yadav R, Jain D, Mathur SR, et al. . Gallbladder carcinoma: An attempt of WHO histological classification on fine needle aspiration material. Cytojournal 2013; 10: 12.
    1. Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates. Cancer 1992; 70: 1493-1497.
    1. Lim H, Seo DW, Park do H, et al. . Prognostic factors in patients with gallbladder cancer after surgical resection: analysis of 279 operated patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 443-448.
    1. Kalra N, Suri S, Gupta R, et al. . MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 758-762.
    1. Kalra N, Gupta P, Singhal M, et al. . Cross-sectional imaging of gallbladder carcinoma: an update. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2019; 9: 334-344.
    1. Gupta P, Marodia Y, Bansal A, et al. . Imaging-based algorithmic approach to gallbladder wall thickening. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26: 6163-6181.
    1. Gupta P, Kumar M, Sharma V, et al. . Evaluation of gallbladder wall thickening: a multimodality imaging approach. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14: 463-473.
    1. Gupta P, Kesha M, Marodia Y, et al. . Locally advanced gallbladder cancer: A review of the criteria and role of imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46: 998-1007.
    1. Chandra S, Chandra H, Shukla SK, et al. . Fine-needle aspiration cytology of gallbladder with an attempt of cytomorphological classification. Cytojournal 2019; 16: 1.
    1. Kumar R, Srinivasan R, Gupta N, et al. . Spectrum of gallbladder malignancies on fine-needle aspiration cytology: 5 years retrospective single institutional study with emphasis on uncommon variants. Diagn Cytopathol 2017; 45: 36-42.
    1. Kumar N, Singhal P, Agarwal A, et al. . Cytopathological diagnosis of gallbladder mass and mural thickening based on imaging findings: a prospective study of 51 cases. J Cytol 2015; 32: 234-237.
    1. Kumar S, Singh D, Goel MM, et al. . FNAC site metastasis in gall bladder cancer–a rare presentation. BMJ Case Rep 2012; 2012: bcr0220125777.
    1. Sharma P, Chatterjee P. Late port site metastasis from occult gall bladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis: the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 48: 317-320.
    1. Hu JB, Sun XN, Xu J, et al. . Port site and distant metastases of gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy diagnosed by positron emission tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 6428-6431.
    1. Miles KA, Ganeshan B, Hayball MP. CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean? Cancer Imaging 2013; 13: 400-406.
    1. Ganeshan B, Goh V, Mandeville HC, et al. . Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. Radiology 2013; 266: 326-336.
    1. Oh J, Lee JM, Park J, et al. . Hepatocellular carcinoma: texture analysis of preoperative computed tomography images can provide markers of tumor grade and disease-free survival. Korean J Radiol 2019; 20: 569-579.
    1. Ji GW, Zhang YD, Zhang H, et al. . Biliary tract cancer at CT: a radiomics-based model to predict lymph node metastasis and survival outcomes. Radiology 2019; 290: 90-98.
    1. Chu LC, Park S, Kawamoto S, et al. . Utility of CT radiomics features in differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from normal pancreatic tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213: 349-357.
    1. Choi TW, Kim JH, Park SJ, et al. . Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 196-205.
    1. Ji GW, Zhu FP, Zhang YD, et al. . A radiomics approach to predict lymph node metastasis and clinical outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 3725-3735.
    1. Xie T, Wang X, Li M, et al. . Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a radiomics nomogram outperforms clinical model and TNM staging for survival estimation after curative resection. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 2513-2524.
    1. Chowdhury R, Ganeshan B, Irshad S, et al. . The use of molecular imaging combined with genomic techniques to understand the heterogeneity in cancer metastasis. Br J Radiol 2014; 87: 20140065.
    1. Win T, Miles KA, Janes SM, et al. . Tumor heterogeneity and permeability as measured on the CT component of PET/CT predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 3591-3599.
    1. Dohan A, Gallix B, Guiu B, et al. . Early evaluation using a radiomic signature of unresectable hepatic metastases to predict outcome in patients with colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. Gut 2020; 69: 531-539.
    1. Yasaka K, Akai H, Mackin D, et al. . Precision of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis using image filtering: A phantom study for scanner variability. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e6993.
    1. Goyal A, Razik A, Kandasamy D, et al. . Role of MR texture analysis in histological subtyping and grading of renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44: 3336-3349.
    1. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, et al. . Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 342-348.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel