Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing with Sexual Minority Male Couples to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk: The Couples Health Project

Tyrel J Starks, Trinae Adebayo, Kory D Kyre, Brett M Millar, Mark J Stratton Jr, Monica Gandhi, Karen S Ingersoll, Tyrel J Starks, Trinae Adebayo, Kory D Kyre, Brett M Millar, Mark J Stratton Jr, Monica Gandhi, Karen S Ingersoll

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial evaluated the preliminary efficacy of a dyadically-delivered motivational interviewing (MI) intervention to reduce drug use and sexual risk in a sample of 50 sexual minority (cis)male (SMM) couples. In each couple, at least one partner was aged 18-29; reported drug use and sexual HIV transmission risk; and was HIV-negative. Couples were randomized to either the three-session MI intervention or an attention-matched control, with follow-up surveys completed at 3- and 6-months post-baseline. Between-group differences for all outcomes were non-significant in the overall sample. Subsequent moderation analyses indicated the intervention significantly reduced illicit drug use (excluding marijuana) at 3-month follow-up when either respondents (B = - 1.96; interval rate ratio-IRR 0.02-1.22; p = .001), their partners (B = - 2.60; IRR 0.01-0.64; p = .004), or both (B = - 2.38; IRR 0.01-0.80; p = .001) reported high levels of baseline use. The intervention also reduced condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual partners when both partners reported high frequency baseline CAS (B = - 2.54; IRR 0.01-0.83; p = .047). Findings provide initial evidence of the potential for MI to address drug use and sexual risk-taking among SMM couples at highest risk.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine) Identifier: #NCT03386110.

Keywords: Club drug; Gay and bisexual men; HIV; Marijuana; Sexually transmitted infection.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) study flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Other Illicit Drug Use frequency at 3-month follow-up: interactions among condition, actor baseline report, and partner baseline report
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CAS with casual partners frequency at 6-month follow-up: interactions among condition, actor baseline report, and partner baseline report

References

    1. Medley G, Lipari RN, Bose J, Cribb DS, Kroutil LA, McHenry G. Sexual orientation and estimates of adult substance use and mental health: results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH Data Review. 2016.
    1. Starks TJ, Cabral C, Talan A. Drug use among sexual and gender minority populations. In: Rothblum E, editor. Oxford handbook of sexual and gender minority mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2018 (updated). 2020.
    1. Goodreau SM, Carnegie NB, Vittinghoff E, Lama JR, Sanchez J, Grinsztejn B, et al. What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e50522.
    1. Goodreau SM, Carnegie NB, Vittinghoff E, Lama JR, Sanchez J, Grinsztejn B, et al. Correction: what drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS ONE. 2013 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050522.
    1. Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS. 2009;23(9):1153–1162.
    1. Starks TJ, Jones S, Kyre K, Robles G, Cain D, Jimenez R, et al. Testing the drug use and condomless anal sex link among sexual minority men: the predictive utility of marijuana and interactions with relationship status. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108318.
    1. Starks TJ, Robles G, Bosco SC, Dellucci TV, Grov C, Parsons JT. The prevalence and correlates of sexual arrangements in a national cohort of HIV-negative gay and bisexual men in the United States. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(1):369–382.
    1. Rendina HJ, Moody RL, Ventuneac A, Grov C, Parsons JT. Aggregate and event-level associations between substance use and sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: comparing retrospective and prospective data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;154:199–207.
    1. Vosburgh HW, Mansergh G, Sullivan PS, Purcell DW. A review of the literature on event-level substance use and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1394–1410.
    1. Sewell J, Miltz A, Lampe FC, Cambiano V, Speakman A, Philips AN, et al. Poly drug use, chemsex drug use, and associations with sexual risk behaviour in HIV-negative men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;43:33–43.
    1. Starks TJ, Jones SS, Sauermilch D, Benedict M, Adebayo T, Cain D, et al. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19: a cohort comparison study of drug use and risky sexual behavior among sexual minority men in the USA. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:1–7.
    1. Starks TS, Sauermilch D, Adebayo T, Kyre KD, Stratton M, Darbes LA. Day-level associations between drug use and sexual behavior in male couples: actor partner interdependence modeling of timeline follow-back data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;225:108758.
    1. Morgan E, Skaathun B, Michaels S, Young L, Khanna A, Friedman SR, et al. Marijuana use as a sex-drug is associated with HIV risk among black MSM and their network. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(3):600–607.
    1. Mitchell JW. Differences in relationship characteristics between HIV-negative male couples who used and did not use substances with sex. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(3):667–678.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
    1. Pantalone DW, Nelson KM, Batchelder AW, Chiu C, Gunn HA, Horvath KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of combination behavioral interventions co-targeting psychosocial syndemics and HIV-related health behaviors for sexual minority men. J Sex Res. 2020;57(6):681–708.
    1. Soderlund PD. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing for improving physical activity self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes: a review. Chronic Illn. 2018;14(1):54–68.
    1. Zomahoun HTV, Guenette L, Gregoire JP, Lauzier S, Lawani AM, Ferdynus C, et al. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):589–602.
    1. DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887.
    1. Parsons JT, Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Botsko M, Golub SA. A randomized controlled trial utilizing motivational interviewing to reduce HIV risk and drug use in young gay and bisexual men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(1):9–18.
    1. Starks TJ, Parsons JT. Drug use and HIV prevention with young gay and bisexual men: partnered status predicts intervention response. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(9):2788–2796.
    1. Apodaca T, Manuel JK, Moyers T, Amrhein P. Motivational Interviewing with significant others (MISO) coding manual 2007. .
    1. Monti PM, Colby SM, Mastroleo NR, Barnett NP, Gwaltney CJ, Apodaca TR, et al. Individual versus signficant-other-enhanced brief motivational intervention for alcohol in emergency care. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(6):936–948.
    1. Magill M, Mastroleo NR, Apodaca TR, Barnett NP, Colby SM, Monti PM. Motivational Interviewing with significant other participation: Assessing therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction and engagement. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;39(4):391–398.
    1. Manuel JK, Houck JM, Moyers TB. The impact of significant others in motivational enhancement therapy: findings from project MATCH. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012;40:297–312.
    1. Miller WR, Rose GS. Motivational interviewing in a relational context. Am Psychol. 2010;65(4):298–299.
    1. Starks TJ, Millar BM, Doyle KM, Bertone PB, Ohadi J, Parsons JT. Motivational Interviewing with couples: a theoretical framework for clinical practice illustrated in substance use and HIV prevention intervention with gay couples. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2018;5(4):490–502.
    1. Starks TJ, Robles G, Doyle KM, Pawson M, Bertone PB, Millar BM, et al. Motivational Interviewing with male couples to reduce substance use and HIV risk: manifestations of partner discord and strategies for facilitating dyadic functioning. Psychotherapy. 2020;57(1):58–67.
    1. Kelley HH, Thibaut JW. Interpersonal relations: a theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley; 1978.
    1. Rusbult CE, Verette J, Whitney GA, Slovik LF, Lipkus I. Accommodation processes in close relationships: theory and preliminary empirical evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(1):53–78.
    1. Lewis MA, Gladstone E, Schmal S, Darbes LA. Health-related social control and relationship interdependence among gay couples. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(4):488–500.
    1. Rusbult CE, Zembrodt IM, Gunn LK. Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;43(6):1230–1242.
    1. Agnew CR, Van Lange PAM, Rusbult CE, Langston CA. Cognitive interdependence: commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(4):939–954.
    1. Sullivan PS, Stephenson R, Grazter B, Wingood G, DiClemente RJ, Allen S, et al. Adaptation of the African couples HIV testing and counseling model for men who have sex with men in the United States: an application of the ADAPT-ITT framework. Springerplus. 2014;3(1):249–280.
    1. Sullivan PS, White D, Rosenberg ES, Barnes J, Jones J, Dasgupta S, et al. Safety and acceptability of couples HIV testing and counseling for US men who have sex with men: a randomized prevention study. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2014;13(2):135–144.
    1. Newcomb ME, Macapagal KR, Feinstein BA, Bettin E, Swann G, Whitton SW. Integrating HIV prevention and relationship education for young same-sex male couples: a pilot trial for the 2GETHER intervention. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(8):2464–2478.
    1. Whitton SW, Weitbrecht EM, Kyryluk AD, Hutsell DW. A randomized waitlist-controlled trial of culturally sensitive relationship education for male same-sex couples. J Fam Psychol. 2016;30(6):763–768.
    1. Wu E, El-Bassel N, McVinney LD, Hess L, Remien RH, Charania M, et al. Feasibility and promise of a couple-based HIV/STI preventive intervention for methamphetamine-using, black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(8):1745–1754.
    1. Robles G, Dellucci TV, Stratton MJ, Starks TJ. The utility of index case recruitment for establishing couples' eligibility: an examination of consistency in reporting the drug use of a primary partner among sexual minority male couples. Couple Family Psychol. 2019;8:221–232.
    1. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline followback user's guide. Toronto, Canada: Alcohol Research Foundation; 1996.
    1. Parsons JT, John SA, Millar BM, Starks TJ. Testing the efficacy of combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral skills training to reduce methamphetamine use and improve HIV medication adherence among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(8):2674–2686.
    1. Moyers TB, Manuel JK, Ernst D. Motivational interviewing treatment integrity coding manual 4.0: Unpublished manual; 2014.
    1. Starks TJ, Doyle KM, Stewart JL, Bosco SC, Ingersoll KS. Development of motivational interviewing treatment integrity (MITI) fidelity codes assessing motivational interviewing with couples. AIDS Behav. 2021. 10.1007/s10461-021-03288-8.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC): in Health Care Facilities, trainer’s manual: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. .
    1. Dellucci TV, Carmichael C, Starks TJ. Arrangements versus agreements: Evaluating two approaches to measuring male couples’ rules and understandings around sex with outside sex partners. Arch Sexual Behav. 2020;50:1689–1700.
    1. Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR. Validity of the drug abuse screening test (DAST-10) in inpatient substance abusers. Problems Drug Depend. 1991;119:233–235.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus users guide and Mplus version 8.2. 2018.
    1. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
    1. Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(1):81–88.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Compendium of evidence-based interventions and best practices for HIV prevention [online index of proven effective interventions].
    1. Starks TJ, Dellucci TV, Gupta S, Robles G, Stephenson R, Sullivan P, et al. A pilot randomized trial of intervention components addressing drug use in couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) with male couples. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:2407–2420.
    1. Starks TJ, Robles G, Pawson M, Jimenez RH, Gandhi M, Parsons JT, et al. Motivational Interviewing to reduce drug use and HIV incidence among young men who have sex with men in relationships and are high priority for pre-exposure prophylaxis (Project PARTNER): randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(7):e13015.
    1. Stephenson R, Freeland R, Sullivan SP, Riley E, Johnson BA, Mitchell J, et al. Home-based HIV testing and counseling for male couples (Project Nexus): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(5):e101.
    1. Stephenson R, Suarez NA, Garofalo R, Hidalgo MA, Hoehnle S, Thai J, et al. Project stronger together: protocol to test a dyadic intervention to improve engagement in HIV care among sero-discordant male couples in three US cities. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(8):e170.
    1. Starks TJ, Feldstein Ewing SW, Lovejoy T, Gurung S, Cain D, Fan CA, et al. Multi-phase effectiveness trial of an adolescent male couples-based HIV testing intervention. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8:e11186.
    1. Gamarel KE, Darbes LA, Hightow-Weidman L, Sullivan P, Stephenson R. The development and testing of a relationship skills intervention to improve HIV prevention uptake among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and their primary partners (we prevent): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(1):e10370.
    1. Starks TJ, Millar BM, Parsons JT. Correlates of individual versus joint participation in online survey research with same-sex male couples. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):963–969.
    1. Yucel D, Gassanov MA. Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Soc Sci Res. 2010;39(5):725–738.
    1. Stephenson R, Chavanduka TM, Sullivan S, Mitchell JW. Correlates of successful enrollment of same-sex male couples into a web-based HIV prevention research study: cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveil. 2020;6(1):e15078.
    1. Stephenson R, Garofalo R, Sullivan PS, Hidalgo MA, Bazzi AR, Hoehnle S, et al. Stronger together: results from a randomized controlled efficacy trial of a dyadic intervention to improve engagement in HIV care among serodiscordant male couples in three US cities. AIDS Behav. 2021;25:2369–2381.
    1. Dillingham R, Ingersoll K, Flickinger TE, Waldman AL, Grabowski M, Laurence C, et al. PositiveLinks: a mobile health intervention for retention in HIV care and clinical outcomes with 12-month follow-up. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(6):241–250.
    1. Moskowitz JT, Carrico AW, Duncan LG, Cohn MA, Cheung EO, Batchelder A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention for people newly diagnosed with HIV. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(5):409–423.
    1. Carrico AW, Gómez W, Siever MD, Discepola MV, Dilworth SE, Moskowitz JT. Pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrative intervention with methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1861–1867.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel