Efficacy and safety of a novel, nebulized glycopyrrolate for the treatment of COPD: effect of baseline disease severity and age; pooled analysis of GOLDEN 3 and GOLDEN 4

Jill Ohar, Robert Tosiello, Thomas Goodin, Shahin Sanjar, Jill Ohar, Robert Tosiello, Thomas Goodin, Shahin Sanjar

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of nebulized glycopyrrolate inhalation solution (GLY), administered twice daily (BID) via the innovative eFlow® Closed System nebulizer (PARI Pharma GmbH, Starnberg, Germany), were demonstrated in two replicate, placebo-controlled, 12-week Phase III studies (GOLDEN 3 and GOLDEN 4). This report evaluates the efficacy and safety of GLY by baseline disease severity and age in the pooled GOLDEN 3 and GOLDEN 4 patient population (N=1,294).

Methods: Patients were grouped by baseline predicted post-bronchodilator FEV1 (<50%, ≥50%) and age (<65, ≥65, ≥75 years).

Results: GLY (25 and 50 μg BID) produced significant improvements in trough FEV1 in FEV1% predicted <50% (0.070 L, 0.079 L) and ≥50% (0.112 L, 0.126 L) subgroups (P<0.01 vs placebo), and in patients aged <65 (0.056 L, 0.086 L), ≥65 (0.140 L, 0.124 L), and ≥75 (0.144 L, 0.120 L) years (P<0.05 vs placebo). St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score was significantly improved with GLY 25 and 50 μg BID (P<0.05 vs placebo) in FEV1% predicted <50% (-3.237, -3.061) and ≥50% (-3.392, -2.322) and in <65 years (-3.447, -2.318) and ≥65 years (-3.053, -3.098) subgroups. In patients aged ≥75 years, GLY 25 μg reduced SGRQ total score by -6.278 units (P<0.01 vs placebo). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between GLY and placebo across all subgroups, and the overall incidence of cardiovascular events was low.

Conclusions: Nebulized GLY improved lung function and health status and was well tolerated over 12 weeks in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, irrespective of baseline disease severity and age.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02347761, NCT02347774.

Keywords: COPD; LAMA; age; disease severity; long-acting muscarinic antagonist; nebulized glycopyrrolate; nebulizer.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Jill Ohar has served on advisory boards for Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Mylan, and Theravance, and has provided expert witness testimony for: Wallace & Graham, Levy Konigsberg, Goldenberg Heller & Antognoli, Simon Greensone Panatier Bartlett, Williams Kherkher Hart, Gori Julian & Associates, Simmons Hanley Conroy, and Elrod Pope. Robert Tosiello, Thomas Goodin, and Shahin Sanjar are employees of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GOLDEN 3 and GOLDEN 4 study designs: 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, efficacy and safety studies. Notes: Data from Kerwin et al. Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CS, closed system; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting beta2-agonist.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LS mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 by (A) baseline FEV1% predicted and (B) age. Notes: *P<0.05 vs placebo; **P<0.01 vs placebo; ***P<0.001 vs placebo. aSubset of the ≥65 years subgroup. Abbreviations: LS, least squares; SE, standard error; GLY, glycopyrrolate inhalation solution; BID, twice daily.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LS mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 by (A) baseline FEV1% predicted and (B) age. Notes: *P<0.05 vs placebo; **P<0.01 vs placebo; ***P<0.001 vs placebo. aSubset of the ≥65 years subgroup. Abbreviations: LS, least squares; SE, standard error; GLY, glycopyrrolate inhalation solution; BID, twice daily.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LS mean SGRQ total score by (A) baseline FEV1% predicted and (B) age. Notes: *P<0.05 vs placebo; **P<0.01 vs placebo. aSubset of the ≥65 years subgroup. Abbreviations: LS, least squares; SE, standard error; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; GLY, glycopyrrolate inhalation solution; BID, twice daily; MCID, minimum clinically important difference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SGRQ responder (≥4-unit reduction in SGRQ total score) rates by (A) baseline FEV1% predicted and (B) age. Notes: *P<0.05 vs placebo. aSubset of the ≥65 years subgroup. Abbreviations: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; GLY, glycopyrrolate inhalation solution; BID, twice daily.

References

    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Inc Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD, 2018. [Guidelines] 2018. [Accessed July 26, 2018]. Available from:
    1. Wheaton AG, Cunningham TJ, Ford ES, Croft JB. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Employment and activity limitations among adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(11):289–295.
    1. Mapel DW, Dalal AA, Blanchette CM, Petersen H, Ferguson GT. Severity of COPD at initial spirometry-confirmed diagnosis: data from medical charts and administrative claims. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:573–581.
    1. Cabrera López C, Casanova Macario C, Marín Trigo JM, et al. Comparison of the 2017 and 2015 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Reports. Impact on grouping and outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(4):463–469.
    1. Sharma G, Goodwin J. Effect of aging on respiratory system physiology and immunology. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1(3):253–260.
    1. Taffet GE, Donohue JF, Altman PR. Considerations for managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:23–30.
    1. Schermer T, Heijdra Y, Zadel S, et al. Flow and volume responses after routine salbutamol reversibility testing in mild to very severe COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101(6):1355–1362.
    1. Vogelmeier C, Hederer B, Glaab T, et al. Tiotropium versus salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(12):1093–1103.
    1. Decramer ML, Chapman KR, Dahl R, et al. Once-daily indacaterol versus tiotropium for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (INVIGORATE): a randomised, blinded, parallel-group study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(7):524–533.
    1. Anthonisen NR, Lindgren PG, Tashkin DP, et al. Bronchodilator response in the lung health study over 11 yrs. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(1):45–51.
    1. Wieshammer S, Dreyhaupt J. Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75(1):18–25.
    1. Amin AN, Ganapathy V, Roughley A, Small M. Confidence in correct inhaler technique and its association with treatment adherence and health status among US patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1205–1212.
    1. Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Brady TJ. Vital signs: prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation – United States, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(9):246–253.
    1. Mahler DA, Waterman LA, Ward J, Gifford AH. Comparison of dry powder versus nebulized beta-agonist in patients with COPD who have suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014;27(2):103–109.
    1. Filuk R. Delivery system selection: clinical considerations. Am Health Drug Benefit. 2008;1(Suppl 8):13–17.
    1. Barrons R, Pegram A, Borries A. Inhaler device selection: special considerations in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(13):1221–1232.
    1. Gray SL, Williams DM, Pulliam CC, Sirgo MA, Bishop AL, Donohue JF. Characteristics predicting incorrect metered-dose inhaler technique in older subjects. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(9):984–988.
    1. LONHALA MAGNAIR (glycopyrrolate) inhalation solution [package insert] Marlborough, MA: Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2018.
    1. Kerwin E, Donohue JF, Goodin T, Tosiello R, Wheeler A, Ferguson GT. Efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/eFlow® CS (nebulized glycopyrrolate) in moderate-to-very-severe COPD: Results from the glycopyrrolate for obstructive lung disease via electronic nebulizer (GOLDEN) 3 and 4 randomized controlled trials. Respir Med. 2017;132:238–250.
    1. Feldman G, Maltais F, Khindri S, et al. A randomized, blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium 62.5 μg compared with tiotropium 18 μg in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:719–730.
    1. Ferguson GT, Karpel JP, Clerisme-Beaty E, Grönke L, Voß F, Buhl R. Efficacy and safety of tiotropium + olodaterol maintenance treatment in patients with COPD in the TONADO® and OTEMTO® studies: a subgroup analysis by age. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2701–2710.
    1. Singh D, Gaga M, Schmidt O, et al. Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO® studies. Respir Res. 2016;17(1):73.
    1. Ferguson GT, Fležar M, Korn S, et al. Efficacy of tiotropium + olodaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by initial disease severity and treatment intensity: a post hoc analysis. Adv Ther. 2015;32(6):523–536.
    1. Chapman KR, Bateman ED, Chen H, Hu H, Fogel R, Banerji D. QVA149 improves lung function, dyspnea, and health status independent of previously prescribed medications and COPD severity: A subgroup analysis from the SHINE and ILLUMINATE studies. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015;2(1):48–60.
    1. Adeloye D, Chua S, Lee C, et al. Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2015;5(2):020415.
    1. Burney P, Suissa S, Soriano JB, et al. The pharmacoepidemiology of COPD: recent advances and methodological discussion. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003;43:1s–44s.
    1. Ferrucci L, Giallauria F, Guralnik JM. Epidemiology of aging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008;46(4):643–652.
    1. Rau JL. Practical problems with aerosol therapy in COPD. Respir Care. 2006;51(2):158–172.
    1. Dhand R, Dolovich M, Chipps B, Myers TR, Restrepo R, Farrar JR. The role of nebulized therapy in the management of COPD: evidence and recommendations. COPD. 2012;9(1):58–72.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel