Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women

Thach Duc Tran, Tuan Tran, Jane Fisher, Thach Duc Tran, Tuan Tran, Jane Fisher

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety are recognised increasingly as serious public health problems among women in low- and lower-middle income countries. The aim of this study was to validate the 21-item Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21) for use in screening for these common mental disorders among rural women with young children in the North of Vietnam.

Methods: The DASS-21 was translated from English to Vietnamese, culturally verified, back-translated and administered to women who also completed, separately, a psychiatrist-administered Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis 1 diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders. The sample was a community-based representative cohort of adult women with young children living in Ha Nam Province in northern Viet Nam. Cronbach's alpha, Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify the psychometric properties of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress subscales and the overall scale.

Results: Complete data were available for 221 women. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of each sub-scale and the overall scale were high, ranging from 0.70 for the Stress subscale to 0.88 for the overall scale, but EFA indicated that the 21 items all loaded on one factor. Scores on each of the three sub-scales, and the combinations of two or three of them were able to detect the common mental disorders of depression and anxiety in women with a sensitivity of 79.1% and a specificity of 77.0% at the optimal cut off of >33. However, they did not distinguish between those experiencing only depression or only anxiety.

Conclusions: The total score of the 21 items of the DASS21-Vietnamese validation appears to be comprehensible and sensitive to detecting common mental disorders in women with young children in primary health care in rural northern Vietnam and therefore might also be useful to screen for these conditions in other resource-constrained settings.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exploratory factor analyses of the depression anxiety stress scale 21 items (DASS 21) in 221 Vietnamese women.

References

    1. Goldberg D, Huxley P. Common Mental Disorders: A Biosocial Model. London: Tavistock / Routledge; 1992.
    1. Fisher J, Mello MC, Patel V, Rahman A, Tran T, Holton S, Holmes W. Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(2):139–149G. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.091850.
    1. WHO. World Health Report 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991;100(3):316–336.
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1995.
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
    1. Ng F, Trauer T, Dodd S, Callaly T, Campbell S, Berk M. The validity of the 21‐item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2007;19(5):304–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00217.x.
    1. Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, Barlow DH. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X.
    1. Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176–181.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44:227–239. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.
    1. Chan RC, Xu T, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Shum DH, O’Gorman J, Potangaroa R. Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatry Res. 2012. in press.
    1. Musa R, Fadzil MA ZZ. Translation, validation and psychometric properties of Bahasa Malaysia version of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;82(2):82–89.
    1. Severino GA, Haynes WDG. Development of an Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychol Health Med. 2010;15(5):607–621. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2010.498889.
    1. Bados A, Solanas A, Andres R. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of depression, anxiety and stress scales (DASS) Psicothema. 2005;17(4):679–683.
    1. Tran TD, Tran T, La B, Lee D, Rosenthal D, Fisher J. Screening for perinatal common mental disorders in women in the north of Vietnam: a comparison of three psychometric instruments. J Affect Disord. 2011;133(1–2):281–293.
    1. Tuan T, Harpham T, Huonh N. Validity and reliability of the self-reporting questionnnaire 20 items in Vietnam. Hong Kong J. 2004;14(3):7–10.
    1. Fisher J, Tran T, La BT, Kriitmaa K, Rosenthal D, Tuan T. Common perinatal mental disorders in northern Viet Nam: community prevalence and health care use. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(10):737–745. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067066.
    1. First M, Gibbon M, Spitzer R, Williams J. User’s Guide for the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 Disorders - Research Version. New York: Biometrics Research; 1996.
    1. Maruyama G. Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
    1. Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge; 2002.
    1. Warner J. Clinicians’ guide to evaluating diagnostic and screening tests in psychiatry. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2004;10:446–454. doi: 10.1192/apt.10.6.446.
    1. GSO. Viet Nam Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2006, Final Report. Ha Noi, Viet Nam: General Statistics Office; 2007.
    1. Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J. Validation of three psychometric instruments for screening for perinatal common mental disorders in men in the north of Vietnam. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.012.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel