Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial

Roni Nitecki, Haley A Moss, Catherine H Watson, Diana L Urbauer, Alexander Melamed, Karen H Lu, Steven M Lipkin, Kenneth Offit, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Melissa K Frey, Roni Nitecki, Haley A Moss, Catherine H Watson, Diana L Urbauer, Alexander Melamed, Karen H Lu, Steven M Lipkin, Kenneth Offit, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Melissa K Frey

Abstract

Background: Identifying mutation-carrying relatives of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes via cascade testing is an underused first step in primary cancer prevention. A feasibility study of facilitated genetic testing of at-risk relatives of patients with a known pathogenic mutation demonstrated encouraging uptake of cascade testing.

Primary objective: Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of genetic testing of identified first-degree relatives of probands with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation randomized to a facilitated cascade testing strategy versus standard of care, proband-mediated, information sharing.

Study hypothesis: We hypothesize that facilitated cascade testing will drive significantly higher uptake of genetic testing than the standard of care.

Trial design: The FaCT (Facilitated Cascade Testing) trial is a prospective multi-institutional randomized study comparing the efficacy of a multicomponent facilitated cascade testing intervention with the standard of care. Patients with a known BRCA1/2 mutation (probands) cared for at participating sites will be randomized. Probands randomized to the standard of care group will be instructed to share a family letter with their first-degree relatives and encourage them to complete genetic testing. First-degree relatives of probands randomized to the intervention arm will receive engagement strategies with a patient navigator, an educational video, and accessible genetic testing services.

Major inclusion/exclusion criteria: Adult participants who are first-degree relatives of a patient with a BRCA1/2 mutation and have not had prior genetic testing will be included.

Primary endpoint: Analyses will assess the proportion of first-degree relatives identified by the proband who complete genetic testing by 6 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm.

Sample size: One hundred and fifty probands with a BRCA1/2 mutation will be randomized. Each proband is expected to provide an average of 3 relatives, for an expected 450 participants.

Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results: January 2024.

Trial registration: NCT04613440.

Keywords: BRCA1 protein; BRCA2 protein; ovarian cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention and standard of care components. FDR, first-degree relative.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study schema. FDR, first-degree relative; MICRA, Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment survey; SDS, Satisfaction with Decision Survey.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel