Sodium oxybate for the maintenance of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients: An international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Julien Guiraud, Giovanni Addolorato, Mariangela Antonelli, Henri-Jean Aubin, Andrea de Bejczy, Amine Benyamina, Roberto Cacciaglia, Fabio Caputo, Maurice Dematteis, Anna Ferrulli, Anna E Goudriaan, Antoni Gual, Otto-Michael Lesch, Icro Maremmani, Antonio Mirijello, David J Nutt, François Paille, Pascal Perney, Roch Poulnais, Quentin Raffaillac, Jürgen Rehm, Benjamin Rolland, Claudia Rotondo, Bruno Scherrer, Nicolas Simon, Katrin Skala, Bo Söderpalm, Lorenzo Somaini, Wolfgang H Sommer, Rainer Spanagel, Gabriele A Vassallo, Henriette Walter, Wim van den Brink, Julien Guiraud, Giovanni Addolorato, Mariangela Antonelli, Henri-Jean Aubin, Andrea de Bejczy, Amine Benyamina, Roberto Cacciaglia, Fabio Caputo, Maurice Dematteis, Anna Ferrulli, Anna E Goudriaan, Antoni Gual, Otto-Michael Lesch, Icro Maremmani, Antonio Mirijello, David J Nutt, François Paille, Pascal Perney, Roch Poulnais, Quentin Raffaillac, Jürgen Rehm, Benjamin Rolland, Claudia Rotondo, Bruno Scherrer, Nicolas Simon, Katrin Skala, Bo Söderpalm, Lorenzo Somaini, Wolfgang H Sommer, Rainer Spanagel, Gabriele A Vassallo, Henriette Walter, Wim van den Brink

Abstract

Background: Sodium oxybate (SMO) has been shown to be effective in the maintenance of abstinence (MoA) in alcohol-dependent patients in a series of small randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These results needed to be confirmed by a large trial investigating the treatment effect and its sustainability after medication discontinuation.

Aims: To confirm the SMO effect on (sustained) MoA in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients.

Methods: Large double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in detoxified adult alcohol-dependent outpatients (80% men) from 11 sites in four European countries. Patients were randomized to 6 months SMO (3.3-3.9 g/day) or placebo followed by a 6-month medication-free period. Primary outcome was the cumulative abstinence duration (CAD) during the 6-month treatment period defined as the number of days with no alcohol use. Secondary outcomes included CAD during the 12-month study period.

Results: Of the 314 alcohol-dependent patients randomized, 154 received SMO and 160 received placebo. Based on the pre-specified fixed-effect two-way analysis of variance including the treatment-by-site interaction, SMO showed efficacy in CAD during the 6-month treatment period: mean difference +43.1 days, 95% confidence interval (17.6-68.5; p = 0.001). Since significant heterogeneity of effect across sites and unequal sample sizes among sites (n = 3-66) were identified, a site-level random meta-analysis was performed with results supporting the pre-specified analysis: mean difference +32.4 days, p = 0.014. The SMO effect was sustained during the medication-free follow-up period. SMO was well-tolerated.

Conclusions: Results of this large RCT in alcohol-dependent patients demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant sustained effect of SMO on CAD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04648423.

Keywords: Alcohol dependence; GHB; RCT; alcohol use disorders; maintenance of abstinence; sodium oxybate.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Giovanni Addolorato served as a consultant for Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and D&A Pharma, and was paid for his consulting services. He has received lecture fees from D&A Pharma. Henri-Jean Aubin reports being member of advisory boards or DSMB for Bioprojet, and Ethypharm, and has received sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from Bioprojet, D&A Pharma, Ethypharm, Kinnov Pharmaceuticals and Lundbeck. He is also a member of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology’s Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE), which was supported in the last 3 years by Alkermes, Amygdala Neurosciences, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Indivior, Lundbeck, Mitsubishi, and Otsuka. Rolland Benjamin received fees from Ethypharm and Lundbeck.

David Nutt reports personal fees from D&A Pharma and Lundbeck. Wim van den Brink reports personal fees from D&A Pharma, Kinnov Therapeutics, Bioproject, Lundbeck, Novartis, Indivior, Angelini, Mundipharma, Takeda, Opiant Inc, Recordati, and Camurus. Maurice Dematteis has provided expert advice to Camurus, Indivior, Molteni, D&A Pharma and Recordati Laboratories, and received fees for lectures from Accord Healthcare, Camurus, Indivior and Recordati Laboratories. Antony Gual reports grants from Novartis and D&A Pharma.

Otto Lesch served as a paid consultant for D&A Pharma. Icro Maremmani served as a board member for Angelini, Camurus, CT Sanremo, D&A Pharma, Gilead, Indivior, Lundbeck, Molteni, MSD, Mundipharma. Jürgen Rehm reported personal fees from D&A Pharma and Lundbeck.

Rainer Spanagel reported grants from Horizon 2020 program, Era-NET NEURON, BMBF, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), and personal fees from EMCCDA and D&A Pharma. Bruno Scherrer reported fees from D&A pharma, DNDI, HRA Pharma, and other pharmaceutical organizations. Roberto Cacciaglia is employed by Laboratorio Farmaceutico CT, San Remo, Italy. Julien Guiraud is employed by D&A Pharma, Paris, France. Roch Poulnais and Quentin Raffaillac were employed by D&A Pharma, Paris, France. None of the other authors received financial support for the current work. Bo Söderpalm and Andrea de Bejczy are founders and co-owners of Sobrera Pharma. AB, currently developing a treatment for alcohol dependence. Lorenzo Somaini served as a board member for Camurus, CT Laboratori Sanremo, GL Pharma, Gilead, Indivior, Molteni, AbbVie.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted mean CAD over the study period. Bars indicate standard error; ***: p ⩽ 0.001. CAD, cumulative abstinence duration.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Site-specific treatment effects (95% CI) in CAD during the 6-month treatment period. CAD, cumulative abstinence duration; CI, confidence interval; PBO: placebo; SMO: sodium oxybate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean difference in CAD during the 6-month treatment period and mean placebo response in each site. CAD, cumulative abstinence duration.

References

    1. Addolorato G, Lesch O-M, Maremmani I, et al.. (2020) Post-marketing and clinical safety experience with sodium oxybate for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome and maintenance of abstinence in alcohol-dependent subjects. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19: 159–166.
    1. Balldin J, Berglund M, Borg S, et al.. (2003) A 6-month controlled naltrexone study: Combined effect with cognitive behavioral therapy in outpatient treatment of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27: 1142–1149.
    1. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, et al.. (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68: 255–278.
    1. Bates D, Kliegl R, Vasishth S, et al.. (2018) Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv:1506.04967 [stat]. Available at: (accessed 6 October 2021).
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al.. (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Software 67: 1–48.
    1. Besson J, Aeby F, Kasas A, et al.. (1998) Combined efficacy of acamprosate and disulfiram in the treatment of alcoholism: a controlled study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22(3): 573–579.
    1. Caputo F, Addolorato G, Lorenzini F, et al.. (2003) Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid versus naltrexone in maintaining alcohol abstinence: An open randomized comparative study. Drug Alcohol Depend 70: 85–91.
    1. Caputo F, Addolorato G, Stoppo M, et al.. (2007) Comparing and combining gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and naltrexone in maintaining abstinence from alcohol: An open randomised comparative study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17: 781–789.
    1. Caputo F, Skala K, Mirijello A, et al.. (2014) Sodium oxybate in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: A randomized double-blind comparative study versus oxazepam. The GATE 1 trial. CNS Drugs 28: 743–752.
    1. Eager C, Roy J. (2017) Mixed effects models are sometimes terrible. arXiv:1701.04858 [stat]. Available at: (accessed 6 October 2021).
    1. European Medicines Agency (2010) Guideline on the development of medicinal products for the treatment of alcohol dependence. EMA/CHMP/EWP/20097/2008. Available at: (accessed 4 March 2021).
    1. European Medicines Agency (2012) Selincro – European public assessment report. EMA/78844/20132005. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2021).
    1. Ewing J. (1984) Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 252:1905–1907.
    1. Feaster DJ, Mikulich-Gilbertson S, Brincks AM. (2011) Modeling site effects in the design and analysis of multi-site trials. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 37: 383–391.
    1. Feuerlein W, Ringer C, Küfner H, et al.. (1979) Diagnosis of alcoholism: The Munich Alcoholism Test (MALT). Curr Alcohol 7: 137–147.
    1. Gallimberti L, Ferri M, Ferrara SD, et al.. (1992) Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid in the treatment of alcohol dependence: A double-blind study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 16: 673–676.
    1. Geerlings PJ, Ansoms C, van den Brink W. (1997) Acamprosate and prevention of relapse in alcoholics. Euro Addict Res 3: 129–137.
    1. Gual A, Lehert P. (2001) Acamprosate during and after acute alcohol withdrawal: A double-blind placebo-controlled study in Spain. Alcohol alcohol 36: 413–418.
    1. Gueorguieva R, Wu R, Donovan D, et al.. (2011) Baseline trajectories of drinking moderate acamprosate and naltrexone effects in the COMBINE study. Alcohol Clini Exp Res 35: 523–531.
    1. Gueorguieva R, Wu R, Donovan D, et al.. (2012) Baseline trajectories of heavy drinking and their effects on postrandomization drinking in the COMBINE Study: Empirically derived predictors of drinking outcomes during treatment. Alcohol 46: 121–131.
    1. Guiraud J, Addolorato G, Aubin H-J, et al.. (2021) Treating alcohol dependence with an abuse and misuse deterrent formulation of sodium oxybate: Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. European Neuropsychopharmacol 52: 18–30.
    1. Kamal RM, van Noorden MS, Franzek E, et al.. (2016) The neurobiological mechanisms of gamma-hydroxybutyrate dependence and withdrawal and their clinical relevance: A review. Neuropsychobiology 73: 65–80.
    1. Keating GM. (2014) Sodium oxybate: A review of its use in alcohol withdrawal syndrome and in the maintenance of abstinence in alcohol dependence. Clin Drug Invest 34: 63–80.
    1. Leone MA, Vigna-Taglianti F, Avanzi G, et al.. (2010) Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) for treatment of alcohol withdrawal and prevention of relapses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD006266.
    1. Lesch O-M, Walter H, Wetschka C, et al.. (2020) Alcohol and Tobacco: Medical and Sociological Aspects of Use, Abuse and Addiction. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    1. Litten RZ, Castle I-JP, Falk D, et al.. (2013) The placebo effect in clinical trials for alcohol dependence: an exploratory analysis of 51 naltrexone and acamprosate studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37: 2128–2137.
    1. Maremmani I, Lamanna F, Tagliamonte A. (2001) Long-term therapy using GHB (sodium gamma hydroxybutyrate) for treatment-resistant chronic alcoholics. J Psychoactive Drugs 33: 135–142.
    1. Nice (2011) Alcohol-use disorders: Diagnosis, assessment and management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence – Appendix 17d Pharmacological Interventions Forest Plots. Available at: (accessed 10 October 2021).
    1. Paille FM, Guelfi JD, Perkins AC, et al.. (1995) Double-blind randomized multicentre trial of acamprosate in maintaining abstinence from alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol 30: 239–247.
    1. Pelc I, Verbanck P, Le Bon O, et al.. (1997) Efficacy and safety of acamprosate in the treatment of detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. A 90-day placebo-controlled dose-finding study. Br J Psychiatry 171: 73–77.
    1. Plinius Maior Society (1994) Guidelines on Evaluation of Treatment of Alcohol Dependence.
    1. Poldrugo F. (1997) Acamprosate treatment in a long-term community-based alcohol rehabilitation programme. Addiction 92: 1537–1546.
    1. Rehm J, Guiraud J, Poulnais R, et al.. (2018) Alcohol dependence and very high risk level of alcohol consumption: A life-threatening and debilitating disease. Addict Biol 23: 961–968.
    1. Rösner S, Hackl-Herrwerth A, Leucht S, et al.. (2010. a) Acamprosate for alcohol dependence. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9: CD004332
    1. Rösner S, Hackl-Herrwerth A, Leucht S, et al.. (2010. b) Acamprosate for alcohol dependence. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9: CD004332.
    1. Sass H, Soyka M, Mann K, et al.. (1996) Relapse prevention by acamprosate: Results from a placebo-controlled study on alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53: 673–680.
    1. Scherrer B, Guiraud J, Addolorato G, et al.. (2021) Baseline severity and the prediction of placebo response in clinical trials for alcohol dependence: A meta-regression analysis to develop an enrichment strategy. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 45: 1722–1734.
    1. Senn S. (2021) Statistical Issues in Drug Development (Statistics in Practice), 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
    1. Skala K, Caputo F, Mirijello A, et al.. (2014) Sodium oxybate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: From the alcohol withdrawal syndrome to the alcohol relapse prevention. Expert Opin Pharmacother 15: 245–257.
    1. Spanagel R, Mann KF. (2005) Drugs for Relapse Prevention of Alcoholism. Basel: Birkhäuser.
    1. Tempesta E, Janiri L, Bignamini A, et al.. (2000) Acamprosate and relapse prevention in the treatment of alcohol dependence: A placebo-controlled study. Alcohol Alcohol 35: 202–209.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (2015) Alcoholism: Developing drugs for treatment guidance for industry. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2021).
    1. van den Brink W, Addolorato G, Aubin H-J, et al.. (2018) Efficacy and safety of sodium oxybate in alcohol-dependent patients with a very high drinking risk level. Addict Biol 23: 969–986.
    1. Veltrup C. (1994) Erfassung des ‘Craving’ bei Alkoholabhängigen mit Hilfe eines neuen Fragebogens (Lübecker Craving-Risiko-Rückfall-Fragebogen)” [Assessment of ‘craving’ in alcoholic patients using a new questionnaire (Lübeck Craving-Recurrence Risk Questionnaire)]. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 106: 75–79.
    1. Whitworth AB, Fischer F, Lesch OM, et al.. (1996) Comparison of acamprosate and placebo in long-term treatment of alcohol dependence. Lancet 347: 1438–1442.
    1. Wiesbeck GA. (2001) Flupenthixol decanoate and relapse prevention in alcoholics: Results from a placebo-controlled study. Alcohol Alcohol 36: 329–334.
    1. World Health Organization (2016) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Available at (accessed 14 June 2022)
    1. World Health Organization (2018) Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available at: (accessed 24 December 2018).

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel