Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Dari Alhuwail, Mowafa Househ, Mounir Hamdi, Zubair Shah, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Dari Alhuwail, Mowafa Househ, Mounir Hamdi, Zubair Shah

Abstract

Background: The recent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is taking a toll on the world's health care infrastructure as well as the social, economic, and psychological well-being of humanity. Individuals, organizations, and governments are using social media to communicate with each other on a number of issues relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Not much is known about the topics being shared on social media platforms relating to COVID-19. Analyzing such information can help policy makers and health care organizations assess the needs of their stakeholders and address them appropriately.

Objective: This study aims to identify the main topics posted by Twitter users related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Leveraging a set of tools (Twitter's search application programming interface (API), Tweepy Python library, and PostgreSQL database) and using a set of predefined search terms ("corona," "2019-nCov," and "COVID-19"), we extracted the text and metadata (number of likes and retweets, and user profile information including the number of followers) of public English language tweets from February 2, 2020, to March 15, 2020. We analyzed the collected tweets using word frequencies of single (unigrams) and double words (bigrams). We leveraged latent Dirichlet allocation for topic modeling to identify topics discussed in the tweets. We also performed sentiment analysis and extracted the mean number of retweets, likes, and followers for each topic and calculated the interaction rate per topic.

Results: Out of approximately 2.8 million tweets included, 167,073 unique tweets from 160,829 unique users met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis identified 12 topics, which were grouped into four main themes: origin of the virus; its sources; its impact on people, countries, and the economy; and ways of mitigating the risk of infection. The mean sentiment was positive for 10 topics and negative for 2 topics (deaths caused by COVID-19 and increased racism). The mean for tweet topics of account followers ranged from 2722 (increased racism) to 13,413 (economic losses). The highest mean of likes for the tweets was 15.4 (economic loss), while the lowest was 3.94 (travel bans and warnings).

Conclusions: Public health crisis response activities on the ground and online are becoming increasingly simultaneous and intertwined. Social media provides an opportunity to directly communicate health information to the public. Health systems should work on building national and international disease detection and surveillance systems through monitoring social media. There is also a need for a more proactive and agile public health presence on social media to combat the spread of fake news.

Keywords: 2019-nCov; SARS-CoV-2; Twitter; coronavirus, COVID-19; disease surveillance; health informatics; infodemiology; infoveillance; public health; social media.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Alaa Ali Abd-Alrazaq, Dari Alhuwail, Mowafa Househ, Mounir Hamdi, Zubair Shah. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.04.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data preprocessing workflow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of selection of tweets.

References

    1. Smith KF, Goldberg M, Rosenthal S, Carlson L, Chen J, Chen C, Ramachandran S. Global rise in human infectious disease outbreaks. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Dec 06;11(101):20140950. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0950.
    1. Cui J, Li F, Shi Z. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 Mar;17(3):181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9.
    1. Zumla A, Chan JFW, Azhar EI, Hui DSC, Yuen K. Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 May;15(5):327–47. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2015.37.
    1. World Health Organization. 2020. Jan 21, Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) situation report - 1 .
    1. Velavan TP, Meyer CG. The COVID-19 epidemic. Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Mar;25(3):278–280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383.
    1. World Health Organization. 2020. Apr 07, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report – 78 .
    1. Jordan S, Hovet S, Fung I, Liang H, Fu K, Tse Z. Using Twitter for public health surveillance from monitoring and prediction to public response. Data. 2018 Dec 29;4(1):6. doi: 10.3390/data4010006.
    1. Shah Z, Surian D, Dyda A, Coiera E, Mandl KD, Dunn AG. Automatically appraising the credibility of vaccine-related web pages shared on social media: a Twitter surveillance study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 04;21(11):e14007. doi: 10.2196/14007.
    1. Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):e1–e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512.
    1. Shah Z, Dunn AG. Event detection on Twitter by mapping unexpected changes in streaming data into a spatiotemporal lattice. IEEE Trans Big Data. 2019:1–1. doi: 10.1109/tbdata.2019.2948594.
    1. Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J. How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):1348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7659-3.
    1. Shah Z, Martin P, Coiera E, Mandl KD, Dunn AG. Modeling spatiotemporal factors associated with sentiment on Twitter: synthesis and suggestions for improving the identification of localized deviations. J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 08;21(5):e12881. doi: 10.2196/12881.
    1. Blei DM, Lafferty JD. Text Mining. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2009. Topic models; pp. 101–24.
    1. Dyda A, Shah Z, Surian D, Martin P, Coiera E, Dey A, Leask J, Dunn AG. HPV vaccine coverage in Australia and associations with HPV vaccine information exposure among Australian Twitter users. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7-8):1488–1495. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1596712.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. [2020-02-23]. Prevention & treatment .
    1. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Challenges of coronavirus disease 2019. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):261. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30072-4.
    1. Vogel L. Viral misinformation threatens public health. CMAJ. 2017 Dec 18;189(50):E1567. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5536.
    1. Biron B, Zhu Y. Business Insider. 2020. Feb 07, [2020-02-23]. Major fast-food chains and retailers in China are shutting their doors as the deadly coronavirus continues to spread. Here's a list of closures .
    1. Hutt R. World Economic Forum. 2020. Feb 17, [2020-02-23]. The economic effects of COVID-19 around the world
    1. Orlik T, Rush J, Cousin M, Hong J. Bloomberg. 2020. Mar 06, Coronavirus Could Cost the Global Economy $2.7 Trillion. Here’s How
    1. Veil SR, Buehner T, Palenchar MJ. A work‐in‐process literature review: incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2011 Jun 01;19(2):110–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x.
    1. Breland JY, Quintiliani LM, Schneider KL, May CN, Pagoto S. Social media as a tool to increase the impact of public health research. Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1890–1891. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304098.
    1. Chou WS, Oh A, Klein WMP. Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417–2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.
    1. Dashtipour K, Poria S, Hussain A, Cambria E, Hawalah AYA, Gelbukh A, Zhou Q. Multilingual sentiment analysis: state of the art and independent comparison of techniques. Cognit Comput. 2016;8:757–771. doi: 10.1007/s12559-016-9415-7.
    1. Twitter. [2020-04-06]. Search tweets .

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel