Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: an animal study followed by clinical application

Changwen Zhang, Yong Xu, Zhihong Zhang, Baomin Qiao, Kuo Yang, Ranlu Liu, Baojie Ma, Changwen Zhang, Yong Xu, Zhihong Zhang, Baomin Qiao, Kuo Yang, Ranlu Liu, Baojie Ma

Abstract

Material/methods: The animal experiments of coagulation therapy on the wound tissue bed during partial nephrectomy with an argon beam coagulator were performed on 16 rabbits, which were randomly divided into 4 groups. Groups A and B had renal artery occlusion; the treatment time of coagulation was 4 seconds and 6 seconds, respectively. Groups C and D did not have renal artery occlusion; the treatment time of coagulation was 2 seconds and 4 seconds, respectively. Then 30 clinical operations of laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using an argon beam coagulator were performed.

Results: All 16 rabbits successfully underwent the operation. By the histological examination, the scab depth of the wound tissue bed in groups A, B, C, and D were 2.76 ± 0.17 mm, 3.15 ± 0.15 mm, 2.28 ± 0.16 mm and 2.75 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. Group A differed significantly from groups B and C (P=0.012, 0.007), and group D differed significantly from groups B and C (P=0.002, 0.002). In the clinical study, all 30 patients successfully underwent the operation. The mean operative time was 182 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 280 ml. With a median follow-up time of 37 months, neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis was found by computerized tomography scan.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using an argon beam coagulator can be considered for treating small renal cell carcinomas. However, the indication of this procedure should be highly selected.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The demonstration of coagulation therapy on the wound tissue bed using an argon beam. (B) CT scan demonstrated a renal cell carcinoma, which was in the lateral portion of the kidney (arrow). (C) Compact structure in the area of scab, and the granulation tissue was found between renal tissue and scab (HE ×40). (D) Calcification was found in the area of necrosis (HE ×40).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The scab depth of the 4 group rabbits’ kidneys. Group A differed significantly from group B & C (P=0.012, 0.007), as well as group D from group B & C (P=0.002, 0.002), but no significant difference between group A and group D (P=0.915).

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 caac.20073.
    1. Carini M, Minervini A, Serni S. Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Current Developments and Controversies. European Urology. 2007;51:12–14.
    1. Becker F, Siemer S, Humke U, et al. Elective Nephron Sparing Surgery Should Become Standard Treatment for Small Unilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-term Survival Data of 216 Patients. European Urology. 2006;49:308–13.
    1. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB. Does The Size of The Surgical Margin in Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer Really Matter? J Urol. 2002;167:61–64.
    1. Tabuse K. Basic knowledge of a microwave tissue coagulator and its clinical applications. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5:165–72.
    1. Terai A, Ito N, Yoshimura K, et al. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using Microwave Tissue Coagulator for Small Renal Tumors: Usefulness and Complications. Eur Urol. 2004;45:744–48.
    1. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1969;10:297–301.
    1. Murphy DP, Gill IS. Energy-based renal tumor ablation: a review. Semin Urol Oncol. 2001;19:133–40.
    1. Mossa BEV, Tucci S, Rega C, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for the management of ovarian endometriomas. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16(4):MT45–50.
    1. Rizek P, Gorecki P, Lindenmayer A, Moktan S. Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Bilateral Metachronous Aldosteronomas. JSLS. 2011;15:100–4.
    1. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Do M, et al. Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: technical issues and outcome. World J Urol. 2011
    1. Hamasaki T, Kondo Y, Matuzawa I, et al. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using a Microwave Tissue Coagulator for Treating Small Peripheral Renal Tumors. J Nihon Med Sch. 2004;71(6):392–98.
    1. Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Hafez KS, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses: An Emerging Quality of Care Concern? J Urol. 2006;175:853–58.
    1. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2010 Update. European Association of Urology Web site.
    1. Lapini A, Serni S, Minervini A, et al. Progression and Long-term Survival After Simple Enucleation for The Elective Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Experience in 107 Patients. J Urol. 2005;174:57–59.
    1. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron Sparing Surgery for Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6–18.
    1. Li Q-L, Guan H-W, Zhang Q-P, et al. Optimal Margin in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma 4 cm or Less. Eur Urol. 2003;44:448–51.
    1. Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, et al. Simple Enucleation for the Treatment of PT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Our 20-Year Experience. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1263–71.
    1. Kane CJ, Mitchell JA, Meng MV, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with temporary arterial occlusion: description of technique and renal functional outcomes. Urology. 2004;63:241–46.
    1. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB, et al. Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. J Urol. 1994;151:1177–80.
    1. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A Prospective, Randomised EORTC Intergroup Phase 3 Study Comparing the Oncologic Outcome of Elective Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy for Low-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59:543–52.
    1. Roos FC, Brenner W, Müller M, et al. Oncologic Long-term Outcome of Elective Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Stage pT1b or Greater in a Matched-pair Cohort. Urology. 2011;77:803–8.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel