Diabetic neuropathy and axon reflex-mediated neurogenic vasodilatation in type 1 diabetes

Maryam Nabavi Nouri, Ausma Ahmed, Vera Bril, Andrej Orszag, Eduardo Ng, Patti Nwe, Bruce A Perkins, Maryam Nabavi Nouri, Ausma Ahmed, Vera Bril, Andrej Orszag, Eduardo Ng, Patti Nwe, Bruce A Perkins

Abstract

Objective: Axon reflex-mediated neurogenic vasodilatation in response to cutaneous heating may reflect early, pre-clinical small fibre dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate the distribution of the vascular flare area measured by laser doppler imaging ("LDI(FLARE) area") in type 1 diabetes and in healthy volunteers.

Research and methods: Concurrent with clinical and electrophysiological examination to classify diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP), LDI(FLARE) area (cm(2)) was determined in 89 type 1 diabetes subjects matched to 64 healthy volunteers. We examined the association and diagnostic performance of LDI with clinical and subclinical measures of DSP and its severity.

Results: Compared to the 64 healthy volunteers, the 56 diabetes controls without DSP had significantly lower LDI(FLARE) area (p = 0.006). The 33 diabetes cases with DSP had substantially lower LDI(FLARE) area as compared to controls without DSP (p = 0.002). There was considerable overlap in LDI(FLARE) area between all groups such that the ROC curve had an AUC of 0.72 and optimal sensitivity of 70% for the detection of clinical DSP. Use of a subclinical definition for DSP, according to subclinical sural nerve impairment, was associated with improved AUC of 0.75 and sensitivity of 79%. In multivariate analysis higher HbA1c and body mass index had independent associations with smaller LDI(FLARE) area.

Conclusions: Axon reflex-mediated neurogenic vasodilatation in response to cutaneous heating is a biomarker of early nerve dysfunction in DSP. Its independent association with glycemic exposure in diabetes subjects and both glycemic exposure and BMI in healthy volunteers highlights the existence of small-fibre dysfunction in the natural history of DSP.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Box-And-Whisker Plots Demonstrating The Distribution…
Figure 1. Box-And-Whisker Plots Demonstrating The Distribution Of LDIFLARE Area In 64 Healthy Volunteers And 89 Type 1 Diabetes Subjects According To Neuropathy Status.
Compared to the healthy volunteer group LDIFLARE area was significantly smaller in subjects with type 1 diabetes without DSP (p = 0.006). Compared to subjects with type 1 diabetes controls without DSP, LDIFLARE area was smaller in cases with DSP (p = 0.0.0002). As indicated in the figure, among controls the LDIFLARE area was not different according to presence or absence of subclinical sural nerve impairment. Similarly, the LDIFLARE area was similar among cases with DSP regardless of severity. The criteria for mild neuropathy were two or more abnormal nerve conduction parameters in the lower limb (sural and peroneal nerve distributions), and moderate and severe neuropathy were defined by four and five abnormal parameters, respectively. NCS, nerve conduction study. LDIFLARE, laser doppler imaging flare. DSP, diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.
Figure 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves…
Figure 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves For The Identification Of Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy (Panel A) And Subclinical Sural Nerve Impairment (Panel B) By LDIFLARE Area In The 89 Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes.
The ROC curve in Panel A employed as the outcome the “England criteria” for DSP. Area under the curve was 0.72 and the threshold on the curve with optimal operating characteristics (≤1.90 cm2 for ruling in cases, indicated by the asterisk) had a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 70%. The ROC curve in Panel B employed as the outcome the “sural nerve criteria” to define an earlier stage of nerve impairment that did the “England Criteria” definition for DSP. The area under the curve was 0.75and the single point on the curve with optimal operating characteristics (also ≤1.90 cm2 for ruling in cases, indicated by the asterisk) had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 60%.

References

    1. Maser RE, Steenkiste AR, Dorman JS, Nielsen VK, Bass EB, et al. Epidemiological correlates of diabetic neuropathy. Report from Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetes. 1989;38:1456–1461.
    1. Orchard TJ, Dorman JS, Maser RE, Becker DJ, Drash AL, et al. Prevalence of complications in IDDM by sex and duration. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study II. Diabetes. 1990;39:1116–1124.
    1. Tesfaye S, Stevens LK, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH, Plater M, et al. Prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic control and potential risk factors: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1377–1384.
    1. Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:956–962.
    1. Dworkin RH, Malone DC, Panarites CJ, Armstrong EP, Pham SV. Impact of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy on health care costs. J Pain. 2010;11:360–368.
    1. Pambianco G, Costacou T, Strotmeyer E, Orchard TJ. The assessment of clinical distal symmetric polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes: a comparison of methodologies from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Cohort. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92:280–287.
    1. Baba M. Hyperesthesia: an early manifestation of diabetic polyneuropathy. Intern Med. 2002;41:1079–1080.
    1. Sumner CJ, Sheth S, Griffin JW, Cornblath DR, Polydefkis M. The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Neurology. 2003;60:108–111.
    1. Smith AG, Singleton JR. Impaired glucose tolerance and neuropathy. Neurologist. 2008;14:23–29.
    1. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Carter GT, Kinsella LJ, et al. Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2009;72:177–184.
    1. Perkins BA, Bril V. Diabetic neuropathy: a review emphasizing diagnostic methods. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1167–1175.
    1. Perkins BA, Orszag A, Ngo M, Ng E, Nwe P, et al. Prediction of Incident Diabetic Neuropathy Using the Monofilament Examination: A 4-year prospective study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1549–1554.
    1. Perkins BA, Olaleye D, Zinman B, Bril V. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:250–256.
    1. Olaleye D, Perkins BA, Bril V. Evaluation of three screening tests and a risk assessment model for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001;54:115–128.
    1. Krishnan ST, Rayman G. The LDIflare: a novel test of C-fiber function demonstrates early neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2930–2935.
    1. Krishnan ST, Quattrini C, Jeziorska M, Malik RA, Rayman G. Abnormal LDIflare but normal quantitative sensory testing and dermal nerve fiber density in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:451–455.
    1. Lin Q, Wu J, Willis WD. Dorsal root reflexes and cutaneous neurogenic inflammation after intradermal injection of capsaicin in rats. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:2602–2611.
    1. Schmelz M, Michael K, Weidner C, Schmidt R, Torebjork HE, et al. Which nerve fibers mediate the axon reflex flare in human skin? Neuroreport. 2000;11:645–648.
    1. Green AQ, Krishnan ST, Rayman G. C-fiber function assessed by the laser doppler imager flare technique and acetylcholine iontophoresis. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:985–991.
    1. Bril V, Perkins BA. Validation of the Toronto Clinical Scoring System for diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2048–2052.
    1. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Miller RG, Asbury AK, et al. Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a definition for clinical research: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2005;64:199–207.
    1. Oh SJ. Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. Normal values for common nerve conduction tests. pp. 86–106.
    1. Hossain P, Sachdev A, Malik RA. Early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with corneal confocal microscopy. Lancet. 2005;366:1340–1343.
    1. Quadrado MJ, Popper M, Morgado AM, Murta JN, Van Best JA. Diabetes and corneal cell densities in humans by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2006;25:761–768.
    1. Quattrini C, Tavakoli M, Jeziorska M, Kallinikos P, Tesfaye S, et al. Surrogate markers of small fiber damage in human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes. 2007;56:2148–2154.
    1. Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel non-invasive technique to quantify small fibre pathology in peripheral neuropathies. J Vis Exp. 2011;47:2194–3001.
    1. Kahn R. Proceedings of a consensus development conference on standardized measures in diabetic neuropathy. Quantitative sensory testing. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1092–1094.
    1. Yarnitsky D. Quantitative sensory testing. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:198–204.
    1. Zinman LH, Bril V, Perkins BA. Cooling detection thresholds in the assessment of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy: comparison of CASE IV and Medoc instruments. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1674–1679.
    1. Caselli A, Spallone V, Marfia GA, Battista C, Pachatz C, et al. Validation of the nerve axon reflex for the assessment of small nerve fibre dysfunction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:927–932.
    1. Green AQ, Krishnan S, Finucane FM, Rayman G. Altered C-fiber function as an indicator of early peripheral neuropathy in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:174–176.
    1. Bornmyr S, Castenfors J, Svensson H, Wroblewski M, Sundkvist G, et al. Detection of autonomic sympathetic dysfunction in diabetic patients. A study using laser Doppler imaging. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:593–597.
    1. Vinik AI, Bril V, Litchy WJ, Price KL, Bastyr EJ Sural sensory action potential identifies diabetic peripheral neuropathy responders to therapy. Muscle Nerve. 2005;32:619–625.
    1. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1327–1334.
    1. Krishnan ST, Quattrini C, Jeziorska M, Malik RA, Rayman G. Neurovascular factors in wound healing in the foot skin of type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:3058–3062.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel