Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database
Jason E Williams, Jennifer L Holub, Douglas O Faigel, Jason E Williams, Jennifer L Holub, Douglas O Faigel
Abstract
Background: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is one of the main quality measures for colonoscopy, but it is burdensome to calculate and is not amenable to claims-based reporting.
Objective: To validate the correlation between polypectomy rates (PRs) and ADRs by using a large group of endoscopists.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Community and academic endoscopy units in the United States.
Subjects: Sixty endoscopists and their patients.
Main outcome measurements: Proportion of patients with any adenoma and any polyp removed; correlation between ADRs and PRs.
Results: In total, 14,341 screening colonoscopies were included, and there was high correlation between endoscopists' PRs and ADRs in men ( r(s)= .91, P < .0001) and women (r(s) = .91, P < .0001). Endoscopists with PRs in the highest quartile had a significantly higher ADR than did those in the lowest quartile in men (44.6% vs 19.4%, P < .0001) and women (33.6% vs 11.6%, P < .0001). Endoscopists in the top polypectomy quartile also found more advanced adenomas than did endoscopists in the bottom quartile (men: 9.6% vs 4.6%, P = .0006; women: 6.3% vs 3.0%, P = .01). Benchmark PRs of 40% and 30% correlated with ADRs greater than 25% and 15% for men and women, respectively.
Limitation: Retrospective analysis of a subset of a national endoscopic database.
Conclusions: Endoscopists' PRs correlate well with their ADRs. Given its clinical relevance, its simplicity, and the ease with which it can be incorporated into claims-based reporting programs, the PR may become an important quality measure.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Source: PubMed