Bisphenol-A and human oocyte maturation in vitro

Ronit Machtinger, Catherine M H Combelles, Stacey A Missmer, Katharine F Correia, Paige Williams, Russ Hauser, Catherine Racowsky, Ronit Machtinger, Catherine M H Combelles, Stacey A Missmer, Katharine F Correia, Paige Williams, Russ Hauser, Catherine Racowsky

Abstract

Study question: Does exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA) affect the maturation of human oocytes in vitro?

Summary answer: There was a dose-response association of BPA exposure with altered human oocyte maturation in vitro.

What is known already: There is widespread exposure of the general population to BPA. BPA has been detected in the human follicular fluid. Animal studies have shown that BPA exposure is associated with maturation arrest and spindle abnormalities in maturing oocytes.

Study design, size, duration: A randomized trial, using 352 clinically discarded oocytes from 121 patients.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: The study population was drawn from patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles in our program at Brigham and Women's Hospital from March 2011 to April 2012. Oocytes from only one cycle for each patient were included in the study. Cycles with at least two germinal vesicle stage oocytes were included with random allocation of one oocyte to culture for 30 h without BPA and remaining sibling oocytes to medium-containing BPA (20, 200 ng/ml or 20 µg/ml). Oocytes were fixed and labeled for tubulin, actin and chromatin and examined with immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Oocytes were assessed for meiotic stage (n = 292), and those at metaphase II (MII, n = 175) were further classified according to their spindle configurations and patterns of chromosome alignment. McNemar's test was used to compare dichotomized maturation status. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for the correlation between oocytes from the same woman and for the spindle analysis.

Main results and the role of chance: As the BPA dose increased, there was a decrease in the percentage of oocytes that progressed to MII (P = 0.002) and increases in the percentage of oocytes that were degenerated (P = 0.01) or that had undergone spontaneous activation (P = 0.007). Among MII oocytes, as the BPA dose increased, there was a significant trend (by test for trend) for a decreased incidence of bipolar spindles (P < 0.0001) and aligned chromosomes (P = 0.02).

Limitations, reasons for caution: Although we used sibling oocytes to overcome potential confounders, such as infertility diagnosis and maternal age, additional studies with a larger number of oocytes are required to confirm the present results. Having access only to clinically discarded oocytes, we were limited to evaluating only those oocytes that failed to mature in vivo despite having been exposed to gonadotrophin stimulation and the ovulatory trigger of HCG.

Wider implications of the findings: To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of BPA on oocyte meiotic maturation, spindle morphology and chromosome alignment in human oocytes. Together with prior animal studies, the data support the negative influences of BPA on cell cycle progression, spindle architecture and chromosome organization during oocyte maturation. Furthermore, the increased rates of abnormal maturation in oocytes exposed to BPA may be relevant to our understanding of the decrease in fertility reported in the last decades.

Study funding/competing interest(s): This study was funded by the NIEHS Center Grant Pilot Project (P30-ES000002). R.M. was sponsored by a fellowship from the Environmental Health Fund, Israel and by the Frederick L. Hisaw Endowment, Harvard School of Public Health. There are no conflicts of interest.

Trial registration number: n/a.

Keywords: bisphenol-A; human oocyte; in vitro; meiosis; meiotic maturation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three-dimensional confocal reconstructions of microtubules (green) and chromatin (red) to show representative meiotic stages of oocytes after culture. (A) GV oocyte; (B) abnormal GV breakdown; (C) metaphase I; (D) telophase I; (E) metaphase II (MII); (F) activated oocyte with a PB. Asterisk indicates the PB. White arrow indicates the pronucleus-like structure. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative classifications of spindle morphology and chromosome alignment in MII oocytes, with microtubules in green (left panels), chromosomes in red (middle panels) and merged images (right panels). Examples include: (A) bipolar (BP) spindle with aligned chromosomes; (B) BP spindle and some chromosomal dispersal, with most chromosomes aligned with the exception of three chromosomes displaced from the spindle equator; (C) BP spindle with chromosomes dispersed throughout the spindle; (D) BP spindle with irregularities (*), notably at one of the spindle poles (asterisk), and some chromosomal dispersal (D*); (E) Non-bipolar spindles (NBP) with chromosomes dispersed (D) within the spindle structure. Scale bar: 5 μm.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel