What Can Epidemiological Studies Tell Us about the Impact of Chemical Mixtures on Human Health?

Joseph M Braun, Chris Gennings, Russ Hauser, Thomas F Webster, Joseph M Braun, Chris Gennings, Russ Hauser, Thomas F Webster

Abstract

Humans are exposed to a large number of environmental chemicals: Some of these may be toxic, and many others have unknown or poorly characterized health effects. There is intense interest in determining the impact of exposure to environmental chemical mixtures on human health. As the study of mixtures continues to evolve in the field of environmental epidemiology, it is imperative that we understand the methodologic challenges of this research and the types of questions we can address using epidemiological data. In this article, we summarize some of the unique challenges in exposure assessment, statistical methods, and methodology that epidemiologists face in addressing chemical mixtures. We propose three broad questions that epidemiological studies can address: a) What are the potential health impacts of individual chemical agents? b) What is the interaction among agents? And c) what are the health effects of cumulative exposure to multiple agents? As the field of mixtures research grows, we can use these three questions as a basis for defining our research questions and for developing methods that will help us better understand the effect of chemical exposures on human disease and well-being.

Conflict of interest statement

J.M.B. was financially compensated for conducting a re-analysis of a study of child lead exposure for the plaintiffs in a public nuisance case related to childhood lead poisoning that is not directly related to the present study.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

References

    1. Axelrad DA, Goodman S, Woodruff TJ. PCB body burdens in U.S. women of childbearing age 2001–2002: an evaluation of alternate summary metrics of NHANES data. Environ Res. 2009;109(4):368–378.
    1. Billionnet C, Sherrill D, Annesi-Maesano I. Estimating the health effects of exposure to multi-pollutant mixture. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(2):126–141.
    1. Bobb JF, Valeri L, Claus Henn B, Christiani DC, Wright RO, Mazumdar M, et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures. Biostatistics. 2015;16(3):493–508.
    1. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Just AC, Yolton K, Calafat AM, Sjödin A, et al. 2014Gestational exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and reciprocal social, repetitive, and stereotypic behaviors in 4- and 5-year-old children: the HOME study. Environ Health Perspect 1225513–520.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1307261
    1. Burns JS, Williams PL, Sergeyev O, Korrick S, Lee MM, Revich B, et al. Serum dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls are associated with growth among Russian boys. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e59–e68.
    1. Carlin DJ, Rider CV, Woychik R, Birnbaum LS.2013Unraveling the health effects of environmental mixtures: an NIEHS priority. Environ Health Perspect 1211A6–A8.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1206182
    1. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. 2015 Available: [accessed 25 April 2015]
    1. Claus Henn B, Schnaas L, Ettinger AS, Schwartz J, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernandez-Avila M, et al. 2012Associations of early childhood manganese and lead co-exposure with neurodevelopment. Environ Health Perspect 1201126–131.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1003300
    1. Cox KJ, Porucznik CA, Anderson DJ, Brozek EM, Szczotka KM, Bailey NM, et al. 2015Exposure classification and temporal variability in urinary bisphenol-A concentrations among couples in Utah: the HOPE Study. Environ Health Perspect;
    1. Czarnota J, Gennings C, Colt JS, De Roos AJ, Cerhan JR, Severson RK, et al. 2015Analysis of environmental chemical mixtures and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk in the NCI-SEER NHL study. Environ Health Perspect 12310965–970.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1408630
    1. Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):850–857.
    1. Howard GJ, Webster TF.2013Contrasting theories of interaction in epidemiology and toxicology. Environ Health Perspect 12111–6.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1205889
    1. Howdeshell KL, Rider CV, Wilson VS, Furr J, Lambright CR, Gray LE., Jr2015Dose addition models based on biologicallyrelevant reductions in fetal testosterone accurately predict postnatal reproductive tract alterations by a phthalate mixture in rats. Toxicol Sci;
    1. Lenters V, Portengen L, Rignell-Hydbom A, Jonsson BA, Lindh CH, Piersma AH, et al. 2015Prenatal phthalate, perfluoroalkyl acid, and organochlorine exposures and term birth weight in three birth cohorts: multi-pollutant models based on elastic net regression. Environ Health Perspect;
    1. Longnecker MP, Ryan JJ, Gladen BC, Schecter AJ. Correlations among human plasma levels of dioxin-like compounds and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and implications for epidemiologic studies. Arch Environ Health. 2000;55(3):195–200.
    1. Maresca MM, Hoepner LA, Hassoun A, Oberfield SE, Mooney SJ, Calafat AM, et al. 2015Prenatal exposure to phthalates and childhood body size in an urban cohort. Environ Health Perspect;
    1. Needham LL, Calafat AM, Barr DB. Assessing developmental toxicant exposures via biomonitoring. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102(2):100–108.
    1. Patel CJ, Cullen MR, Ioannidis JP, Butte AJ. Systematic evaluation of environmental factors: persistent pollutants and nutrients correlated with serum lipid levels. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):828–843.
    1. Poole C. Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? Epidemiology. 2001;12(3):291–294.
    1. Rothman KJ. Significance questing. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105(3):445–447.
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1(1):43–46.
    1. Safe SH. Hazard and risk assessment of chemical mixtures using the toxic equivalency factor approach. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(Suppl 4):1051–1058.
    1. Savitz DA. Is statistical significance testing useful in interpreting data? Reprod Toxicol. 1993;7(2):95–100.
    1. Savitz DA. Invited commentary: interpreting associations between exposure biomarkers and pregnancy outcome. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(5):545–547.
    1. Sun Z, Tao Y, Li S, Ferguson KK, Meeker JD, Park SK, et al. 2013Statistical strategies for constructing health risk models with multiple pollutants and their interactions: possible choices and comparisons. Environ Health 1285; doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-85
    1. Vilahur N, Molina-Molina JM, Bustamante M, Murcia M, Arrebola JP, Ballester F, et al. Male specific association between xenoestrogen levels in placenta and birthweight. Environ Int. 2013;51(1):174–181.
    1. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(8):1847–1850.
    1. Woodruff TJ, Zota AR, Schwartz JM.2011Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect 1196878–885.; doi:10.1289/ehp.1002727

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel