Development and evaluation of a novel, real time mobile telesonography system in management of patients with abdominal trauma: study protocol

Chinwe Ogedegbe, Herman Morchel, Vikki Hazelwood, William F Chaplin, Joseph Feldman, Chinwe Ogedegbe, Herman Morchel, Vikki Hazelwood, William F Chaplin, Joseph Feldman

Abstract

Background: Despite the use of e-FAST in management of patients with abdominal trauma, its utility in prehospital setting is not widely adopted. The goal of this study is to develop a novel portable telesonography (TS) system and evaluate the comparability of the quality of images obtained via this system among healthy volunteers who undergo e-FAST abdominal examination in a moving ambulance and at the ED. We hypothesize that: (1) real-time ultrasound images of acute trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting can be obtained and transmitted to the ED via the novel TS system; and (2) Ultrasound images transmitted to the hospital from the real-time TS system will be comparable in quality to those obtained in the ED.

Methods: Study participants are three healthy volunteers (one each with normal, overweight and obese BMI category). The ultrasound images will be obtained by two ultrasound-trained physicians The TS is a portable sonogram (by Sonosite) interfaced with a portable broadcast unit (by Live-U). Two UTPs will conduct e-FAST examinations on healthy volunteers in moving ambulances and transmit the images via cellular network to the hospital server, where they are stored. Upon arrival in the ED, the same UTPs will obtain another set of images from the volunteers, which are then compared to those obtained in the moving ambulances by another set of blinded UTPs (evaluators) using a validated image quality scale, the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS).

Discussion: Findings from this study will provide needed data on the validity of the novel TS in transmitting live images from moving ambulances to images obtained in the ED thus providing opportunity to facilitate medical care of a patient located in a remote or austere setting.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the Telesonography System.

References

    1. Weir S, Salkever DS, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Mackenzie EJ. One-year treatment costs of trauma care in the USA. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(2):187–197. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.8.
    1. Mackenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, Salkever DS, Weir S, Scharfstein DO. The national study on costs and outcomes of trauma. J Trauma. 2007;63(6 Suppl):S54–S67. discussion S81-6.
    1. Kim KH, Carey K, Burgess JF Jr. Emergency department visits: the cost of trauma centers. Health Care Manag Sci. 2009;12(3):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9088-1.
    1. van der Velden MW, Ringburg AN, Bergs EA, Steyerberg EW, Patka P, Schipper IB. Prehospital interventions: time wasted or time saved? An observational cohort study of management in initial trauma care. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(7):444–449. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052662.
    1. Newgard CD, Schmicker RH, Hedges JR, Trickett JP, Davis DP, Bulger EM, Aufderheide TP, Minei JP, Hata JS, Gubler KD, Brown TB, Yelle JD, Bardarson B, Nichol G. Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the "golden hour" in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.024. e4. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
    1. Pronto Soccorso Chirurgico UO, Ospedale Leopoldo Parodi D, ASL RMG, Colleferro R. Negative and positive prognostic factors in polytrauma, especially referring to "golden hour". Ann Ital Chir. 2009;80(5):337–349.
    1. Regel G, Stalp M, Lehmann U, Seekamp A. Prehospital care, importance of early intervention on outcome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1997;110:71–76.
    1. Jørgensen H, Jensen CH, Dirks J. Does prehospital ultrasound improve treatment of the trauma patient? A systematic review. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010. pp. 371–372. Jan 28.
    1. Musau P. Risk indicators of morbidity and mortality in abdominal injuries. East Afr Med J. 2006;83(12):644–50.
    1. ACEP Clinical Policies Committee; Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Acute Blunt Abdominal Trauma. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43(2):278–90.
    1. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Sehouli J, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ekkernkamp A, Porzsolt F. Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;18(2):CD004446.
    1. McKenney MG, McKenney KL, Hong JJ, Compton R, Cohn SM, Kirton OC, Shatz DV, Sleeman D, Byers PM, Ginzburg E, Augenstein J. Evaluating blunt abdominal trauma with sonography: a cost analysis. Am Surg. 2001;67(10):930–4.
    1. Blaivas M. Triage in the trauma bay with the focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination. J Emerg Med. 2001;21(1):41–4. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00322-5.
    1. Boulanger BR, McLellan BA, Brenneman FD, Ochoa J, Kirkpatrick AW. Prospective evidence of the superiority of a sonography-based algorithm in the assessment of blunt abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1999;47(4):632–7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199910000-00005.
    1. McKenney KL. Ultrasound of blunt abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37(5):879–93. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70136-6.
    1. Arrillaga A, Graham R, York JW, Miller RS. Increased efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the evaluation of the blunt abdominal trauma patient with the use of ultrasound. Am Surg. 1999;65(1):31–5.
    1. Rippey JC, Royse AG. Ultrasound in trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):343–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.02.011.
    1. Chen S, Husereau D, Noorani H, Tran K, Boudreau R, Lentle B, Rowe B, Keating T. Portable ultrasound devices in emergency departments [Technology report no 63] Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment; 2006.
    1. Amoroso TA. Evaluation of the patient with blunt abdominal trauma: an evidence based approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17(1):63–75. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70047-X. viii.
    1. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Sehouli J, Porzsolt F, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ekkernkamp A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of emergency ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma. Br J Surg. 2001;88(7):901–12. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01777.x.
    1. Pearl WS, Todd KH. Ultrasonography for the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective trials. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(3):353–61. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70273-1.
    1. Thomas B, Falcone RE, Vasquez D, Santanello S, Townsend M, Hockenberry S, Innes J, Wanamaker S. Ultrasound evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: program implementation, initial experience, and learning curve. J Trauma. 1997;42(3):384–388. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199703000-00004. discussion 388–90.
    1. Dyer D, Cusden J, Turner C, Boyd J, Hall R, Lautner D, Hamilton DR, Shepherd L, Dunham M, Bigras A, Bigras G, McBeth P, Kirkpatrick AW. The clinical and technical evaluation of a remote telementored telesonography system during the acute resuscitation and transfer of the injured patient. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1209–16. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181878052.
    1. Su MJ, Ma HM, Ko CI, Chiang WC, Yang CW, Chen SJ, Chen R, Chen HS. Application of tele-ultrasound in emergency medical services. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(8):816–24. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0076.
    1. Sibert K, Ricci MA, Caputo M, Callas PW, Rogers FB, Charash W, Malone P. et al.The feasibility of using ultrasound and video laryngoscopy in a mobile telemedicine consult. Telemedicine and E-Health. 2008;14(3):266–272. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0050.
    1. About the QUIS, version 7.0.
    1. Blaivas M, DeBehnke D, Sierzenski PR, Phelan MB. Tissue harmonic imaging improves organ visualization in trauma ultrasound when compared with standard ultrasound mode. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01166.x.
    1. Shapiro RS, Wagreish J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1203–1206.
    1. Blavis M, Lyon M, Duggal S. Ultrasound image transmission via camera phones for overreading. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(4):435–436.
    1. Rozanski TA, Edmondson JM, Jones SB. Ultrasonography in a forward-deployed military hospital. Mil Med. 2005;170(2):99–102.
    1. Peoples GE, Gerlinger T, Craig R, Burlingame B. Combat casualties in Afghanistan cared for by a single forward surgical team during the initial phases of operation enduring freedom. Mil Med. 2005;170(6):462–8.
    1. Nelson BP, Melnick ER, Li J. Portable ultrasound for remote environments, part I: Feasibility of field deployment. J Emerg Med. 2010;425:427. Jan 23.
    1. Nelson BP, Melnick ER, Li J. Portable ultrasound for remote environments, part II: Ultrasound: current indications. J Emerg Med. 2010. pp. 437–438. Jan 23.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel