Activity Performance, Participation, and Quality of Life Among Adults in the Chronic Stage After Acquired Brain Injury-The Feasibility of an Occupation-Based Telerehabilitation Intervention

Aviva Beit Yosef, Jeremy M Jacobs, Shira Shenkar, Jeffrey Shames, Isabella Schwartz, Yehudit Doryon, Yuval Naveh, Fatena Khalailh, Shani Berrous, Yafit Gilboa, Aviva Beit Yosef, Jeremy M Jacobs, Shira Shenkar, Jeffrey Shames, Isabella Schwartz, Yehudit Doryon, Yuval Naveh, Fatena Khalailh, Shani Berrous, Yafit Gilboa

Abstract

Objective: Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of long-term disability. This calls for effective and accessible interventions to support participation in the community over time. One promising avenue to answer this need is telerehabilitation. Prior to conducting a larger trial, the main objective of this pilot study is to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a metacognitive occupation-based intervention in a telerehabilitation format with adults and older adults in the chronic phase after ABI. Methods: Five community dwelling participants (ages 65-72), 6-10 months post-ABI, with scores 2-4 on the modified Rankin scale and without dementia, completed the teleintervention. The intervention included ~10 weekly videoconferencing sessions administered by an occupational therapist using the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance approach. Each participant defined five functional goals and three were trained and two were not trained during the intervention. Evaluations were conducted at pre, post, and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome measures included activity performance (The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; COPM), participation (the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 Participation Index; MPAI-4-P), and quality of life (QoL) (stroke impact scale; SIS). Other measures included a feedback interview, satisfaction questionnaire, field notes, and a treatment fidelity checklist. Results: The teleintervention was found to be feasible and the participants expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the intervention and the technology use. A Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test indicated statistically significant improvements post intervention in COPM performance (z = -2.023, p = 0.043) and satisfaction (z = -2.023, p = 0.043) ratings. Additionally, clinically significant improvements (≥2 points) in both performance and satisfaction with performance were found for each participant in at least three of their five defined functional goals. Trends toward significant improvement were found in MPAI-4-P ratings post intervention (z = -1.826, p = 0.068). Furthermore, clinically significant improvements (≥15 points) post intervention were found for each participant in some subscales of the SIS. Results were partially maintained at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a metacognitive occupation-based telerehabilitation intervention and its potential benefits in activity performance, participation, and QoL for older adults coping with long-term disability following ABI. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03048708.

Keywords: activity performance; chronic acquired brain injury; cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach; metacognitive approach; neurorehabilitation; occupational therapy; participation; telerehabilitation.

Copyright © 2019 Beit Yosef, Jacobs, Shenkar, Shames, Schwartz, Doryon, Naveh, Khalailh, Berrous and Gilboa.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study enrollment, evaluation, intervention, follow-up, and analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants' COPM performance scale ratings at baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Participants' COPM satisfaction with performance scale ratings at baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participants' MPAI-4-P ratings at baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up. MPAI-4-P, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4, Participation Index (82).

References

    1. Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N. Acquired brain injury. In: Taub MB, Bartuccio M, Maino DM, editors. Visual Diagnosis and Care of the Patient with Special Needs. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; (2012). p. 95–100.
    1. Jolliffe L, Lannin NA, Cadilhac DA, Hoffmann T. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e018791. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791
    1. Lannoo E, Brusselmans W, Eynde LV, Van Laere M, Stevens J. Epidemiology of acquired brain injury (ABI) in adults: prevalence of long-term disabilities and the resulting needs for ongoing care in the region of Flanders, Belgium. Brain Inj. (2004) 18:203–11. 10.1080/02699050310001596905
    1. Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2010) 91:1637–40. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017
    1. Sul B, Lee KB, Hong BY, Kim JS, Kim J, Hwang WS, et al. . Association of lesion location with long-term recovery in post-stroke aphasia and language deficits. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:776. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00776
    1. Woodson AM. Stroke. In: Radomski MV, Trombly CA, editors. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. 7th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkinsp; (2014) 999–1167.
    1. Chuluunbaatar E, Chou YJ, Pu C. Quality of life of stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a prospective study. Disabil Health J. (2016) 9:306–12. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.10.007
    1. Corrigan JD, Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck GG, Bell JM, Miller AC, et al. . US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2014) 29:E1–9. 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000020
    1. Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Adams HP, Jr, Chen D, Dromerick AW, Dunning K, et al. . Stroke recovery and rehabilitation research: issues, opportunities, and the national institutes of health strokenet. Stroke. (2017) 48:813–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015501
    1. Eriksson G, Baum MC, Wolf TJ, Connor LT. Perceived participation after stroke: the influence of activity retention, reintegration, and perceived recovery. Am J Occup Ther. (2013) 67:e131–8. 10.5014/ajot.2013.008292
    1. Mahar C, Fraser K. Barriers to successful community reintegration following acquired brain injury (ABI). Int J Disabil Manag. (2011) 6:49–67. 10.1375/jdmr.6.1.49
    1. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, et al. . Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2011) 92:519–30. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015
    1. Geurtsen GJ, van Heugten CM, Martina JD, Geurts AC. Comprehensive rehabilitation programmes in the chronic phase after severe brain injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. (2010) 42:97–110. 10.2340/16501977-0508
    1. Lee D, Heffron JL, Mirza M. Content and effectiveness of interventions focusing on community participation after stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2019) 100:2179-2192.e. .org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.008
    1. Fortune DG, Walsh RS, Waldron B, McGrath C, Harte M, Casey S, et al. . Changes in aspects of social functioning depend upon prior changes in neurodisability in people with acquired brain injury undergoing post-acute neurorehabilitation. Front Psychol. (2015) 6:1368. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01368
    1. Wolf TJ, Chuh A, Floyd T, McInnis K, Williams E. Effectiveness of occupation-based interventions to improve areas of occupation and social participation after stroke: an evidence-based review. Am J Occup Ther. (2015) 69:6901180060p1–11. 10.5014/ajot.2015.012195
    1. Engel-Yeger B, Tse T, Josman N, Baum C, Carey LM. Scoping review: the trajectory of recovery of participation outcomes following stroke. Behav Neurol. (2018) 2018:5472018. 10.1155/2018/5472018
    1. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, Zorowitz RD, Bakas T, Clark P, et al. . Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. (2010) 41:2402–48. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181e7512b
    1. Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. (2007) 29:1566–74. 10.1080/09638280701618588
    1. Wheeler S. Community recovery and participation. In: Golisz KM, Radomski MV, editors. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Interventions to Support Occupational Performance. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2015). p. 231–300.
    1. Wolf TJ, Baum CM, Lee D, Hammel J. The development of the improving participation after stroke self-management program (IPASS): an exploratory randomized clinical study. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2016) 23:284–92. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1155278
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Zhang X-X, Xu W, Liu X-N, Ren C-C. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2015) 24:2660–8. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014
    1. Koh GC-H, Yen SC, Tay A, Cheong A, Ng YS, De Silva DA, et al. . Singapore Tele-technology Aided Rehabilitation in Stroke (STARS) trial: protocol of a randomized clinical trial on tele-rehabilitation for stroke patients. BMC Neurol. (2015) 15:161. 10.1186/s12883-015-0420-3
    1. Ng EM, Polatajko HJ, Marziali E, Hunt A, Dawson DR. Telerehabilitation for addressing executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. (2013) 27:548–64. 10.3109/02699052.2013.766927
    1. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. (2007) 29:559–66. 10.1080/09638280600924996
    1. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2002) 83:1035–42. 10.1053/apmr.2002.33984
    1. Vogler J, Klein AM, Bender A. Long-term health-related quality-of-life in patients with acquired brain injury and their caregivers. Brain Inj. (2014) 28:1381–8. 10.3109/02699052.2014.919536
    1. Bergström AL, Guidetti S, Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Eriksson G. Perceived occupational gaps one year after stroke: an explorative study. J Rehabil Med. (2012) 44:36–42. 10.2340/16501977-0892
    1. Corrigan JD, Hammond FM. Traumatic brain injury as a chronic health condition. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2013) 94:1199–201. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.023
    1. Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, Kirton A, Rumney PG, Bagg S, et al. . Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. (2016) 11:459–84. 10.1177/1747493016643553
    1. Masel BE, DeWitt DS. Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event. J Neurotrauma. (2010) 27:1529–40. 10.1089/neu.2010.1358
    1. Turner BJ, Fleming J, Ownsworth T, Cornwell P. Perceived service and support needs during transition from hospital to home following acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. (2011) 33:818–29. 10.3109/09638288.2010.513422
    1. Cason J, Hartmann K, Jacobs K, Richmond T. Telehealth. Am J Occup Therapy. (2013) 67:S69–90. 10.5014/ajot.2013.67S69
    1. Cason J. Telehealth: a rapidly developing service delivery model for occupational therapy. Int J Telerehabil. (2014) 6:29–35. 10.5195/IJT.2014.6148
    1. Tyagi S, Lim DS, Ho WH, Koh YQ, Cai V, Koh GC, et al. Acceptance of tele-rehabilitation by stroke patients: perceived barriers and facilitators. Arch Phy Med Rehabil. (2018) 99: 2472–7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.033
    1. Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res. (2014) 24:682–694. 10.1177/1049732314528809
    1. Huijgen BC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Zampolini M, Opisso E, Bernabeu M, Van Nieuwenhoven J, et al. . Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. J Telemed Telecare. (2008) 14:249–56. 10.1258/jtt.2008.080104
    1. Kizony R, Weiss PL, Harel S, Feldman Y, Obuhov A, Zeilig G, et al. . Tele-rehabilitation service delivery journey from prototype to robust in-home use. Disabil Rehabil. (2017) 39:1532–40. 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250827
    1. Sakakibara B, Eng JJ, Edgar MC, Monsees S, Rhebergen J, Waring J, et al. Feasibility of telerehabilitation in stroke recovery: a survey on access and willingness to use low-cost consumer technologies. Arch Phy Med Rehabil. (2016) 97:e10–1. 10.1089/tmj.2016.0129
    1. Tam SF, Man WK, Hui-Chan CW, Lau A, Yip B, Cheung W. Evaluating the efficacy of tele-cognitive rehabilitation for functional performance in three case studies. Occup. Ther. Int. (2003) 10:20–38. 10.1002/oti.175
    1. Sarfo FS, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem OK, Ovbiagele B. Tele-rehabilitation after stroke: an updated systematic review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2018) 27:2306–18. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013
    1. Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. (2009) 31:427–47. 10.1080/09638280802062553
    1. Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2013) CD010255. 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub2
    1. Ownsworth T, Arnautovska U, Beadle E, Shum DH, Moyle W. Efficacy of telerehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2018) 33:E33–46. 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350
    1. Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, Pistotti V, Tonin P, Venneri A, et al. . Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. (2015) 21:202–13. 10.1177/1357633X15572201
    1. Benvenuti F, Stuart M, Cappena V, Gabella S, Corsi S, Taviani A, et al. . Community-based exercise for upper limb paresis: a controlled trial with telerehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2014) 28:611–20. 10.1177/1545968314521003
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Dong WS, Jin Y, Qiao FL, Zhou YF, et al. . Effects of home-based telesupervising rehabilitation on physical function for stroke survivors with hemiplegia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2017) 96:152–60. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000559
    1. Keidel M, Vauth F, Richter J, Hoffmann B, Soda H, Griewing B, et al. . Home-based telerehabilitation after stroke. Der Nervenarzt. (2017) 88:113–9. 10.1007/s00115-016-0275-x
    1. Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, Alcañiz M. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2015) 96:418–25.e412. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019
    1. Veras M, Kairy D, Rogante M, Giacomozzi C, Saraiva S. Scoping review of outcome measures used in telerehabilitation and virtual reality for post-stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare. (2017) 23:567–87. 10.1177/1357633X16656235
    1. Woolf C, Caute A, Haigh Z, Galliers J, Wilson S, Kessie A, et al. . A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: a quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. (2016) 30:359–73. 10.1177/0269215515582074
    1. Chumbler NR, Quigley P, Li X, Morey M, Rose D, Sanford J, et al. . Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. (2012) 43:2168–74. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.646943
    1. Bell KR, Fann JR, Brockway JA, Cole WR, Bush NE, Dikmen S, et al. . Telephone problem solving for service members with mild traumatic brain injury: a randomized, clinical trial. J Neurotrauma. (2017) 34:313–21. 10.1089/neu.2016.4444
    1. Bourgeois MS, Lenius K, Turkstra L, Camp C. The effects of cognitive teletherapy on reported everyday memory behaviours of persons with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. (2007) 21:1245–57. 10.1080/02699050701727452
    1. Kamwesiga JT, Eriksson GM, Tham K, Fors U, Ndiwalana A, von Koch L, et al. . A feasibility study of a mobile phone supported family-centred ADL intervention, F@ ce™, after stroke in Uganda. Global Health. (2018) 14:82. 10.1186/s12992-018-0400-7
    1. Hermann VH, Herzog M, Jordan R, Hofherr M, Levine P, Page SJ. Telerehabilitation and electrical stimulation: an occupation-based, client-centered stroke intervention. Ame J Occupat Ther. (2010) 64:73–81. 10.5014/ajot.64.1.73
    1. Bergquist T, Gehl C, Mandrekar J, Lepore S, Hanna S, Osten A, et al. . The effect of internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. (2009) 23:790–9. 10.1080/02699050903196688
    1. Forducey PG, Glueckauf RL, Bergquist TF, Maheu MM, Yutsis M. Telehealth for persons with severe functional disabilities and their caregivers: Facilitating self-care management in the home setting. Psychol Serv. (2012) 9:144. 10.1037/a0028112
    1. Dawson DR, McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP Approach to Enable Participation Across the Lifespan. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017).
    1. Dawson D, Gaya A, Hunt A, Levine B, Lemsky C, Polatajko H. Using the cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP) with adults with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther. (2009) 76:115–27. 10.1177/000841740907600209
    1. Dawson DR, Binns MA, Hunt A, Lemsky C, Polatajko HJ. Occupation-based strategy training for adults with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2013) 94:1959–63. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.021
    1. Henshaw E, Polatajko H, McEwen S, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Cognitive approach to improving participation after stroke: two case studies. Am J Occup Ther. (2011) 65:55–63. 10.5014/ajot.2011.09010
    1. McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MP, Ryan JD. Inter-task transfer of meaningful, functional skills following a cognitive-based treatment: results of three multiple baseline design experiments in adults with chronic stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2010) 20:541–61. 10.1080/09602011003638194
    1. Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occupat Ther. (2012) 66:104–9. 10.5014/ajot.2012.001784
    1. Poulin V, Korner-Bitensky N, Bherer L, Lussier M, Dawson DR. Comparison of two cognitive interventions for adults experiencing executive dysfunction post-stroke: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. (2017) 39:1–13. 10.3109/09638288.2015.1123303
    1. Nadler E, Linkewich B, Ng EM, Skidmore ER, Hunt AW, Dawson DR. Using the CO-OP approach: Alternative delivery methods. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP ApproachTM to Enable Participation Across the life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 207–26.
    1. Patel N, Rao VA, Heilman-Espinoza ER, Lai R, Quesada RA, Flint AC. Simple and reliable determination of the modified rankin scale score in neurosurgical and neurological patients: The mRS-9Q. Neurosurgery. (2012) 71:971–5. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a8a56
    1. Van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, Schouten H, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. (1988) 19:604–7. 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Fanjiang G.MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination Clinical Guide. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; (2001).
    1. Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S, Walker B, Saykin AJ. Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr. (2015) 15:107. 10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3
    1. Berson T. Skype security evaluation. ALR. (2005) 31 Available online at:
    1. Chui A, Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ. CO-OP approach toolkit. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP ApproachTM to Enable Participation Across The Life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 227–55.
    1. McEwen S, Polatajko H, Baum C, Rios J, Cirone D, Doherty M, et al. . Combined cognitive-strategy and task-specific training improve transfer to untrained activities in subacute stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2015) 29:526–36. 10.1177/1545968314558602
    1. Law MC, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. (2014. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: COPM. 5th ed Toronto, ON: CAOT Publ. ACE.
    1. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. (2004) 71:210–22. 10.1177/000841740407100406
    1. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer W, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk–Minis M. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin. Rehabil. (2003) 17:402–9. 10.1191/0269215503cr635oa
    1. Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Am J Occupati Ther. (2007) 61:328–34. 10.5014/ajot.61.3.328
    1. Yang S-Y, Lin C-Y, Lee Y-C, Chang J-H. The Canadian occupational performance measure for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. (2017) 29:548–55. 10.1589/jpts.29.548
    1. Malec JF, Lezak MD. Manual for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) for Adults, Children and Adolescents. (2008). Retrieved from
    1. Tuchner M, Meiner Z, Parush S, Hartman-Maeir A. Relationships between sequelae of injury, participation, and quality of life in survivors of terrorist attacks. OTJR. (2010) 30:29–38. 10.3928/15394492-20091214-05
    1. Malec JF, Kean J, Altman IM, Swick S. Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: Comparing psychometrics in cerebrovascular accident to traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2012) 93:2271–5. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.013
    1. Kean J, Malec JF, Altman IM, Swick S. Rasch measurement analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) in a community-based rehabilitation sample. J Neurotrauma. (2011) 28:745–53. 10.1089/neu.2010.1573
    1. Malec JF. Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2001) 82:885–95. 10.1053/apmr.2001.23895
    1. Altman IM, Swick S, Parrot D, Malec JF. Effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury for 489 program completers compared with those precipitously discharged. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2010) 91:1697–704. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.001
    1. Eicher V, Murphy MP, Murphy TF, Malec JF. Progress assessed with the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2012) 93:100–7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.038
    1. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S. Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americas Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. (2003) 84:950–963. 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
    1. Hartman-Maeir A, Eliad Y, Kizoni R, Nahaloni I, Kelberman H, Katz N. Evaluation of a long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation. (2007) 22:295–301.
    1. Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, Ekstam L, Johansson U, Eriksson G. Changes in the impact of stroke between 3 and 12 months post-stroke, assessed with the Stroke Impact Scale. J Rehabil Med. (2014) 46:963–8. 10.2340/16501977-1865
    1. Ytterberg C, Dyback M, Bergstrom A, Guidetti S, Eriksson G. Perceived impact of stroke six years after onset, and changes in impact between one and six years. J Rehabil Med. (2017) 49:637–43. 10.2340/16501977-2258
    1. Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM. The stroke impact scale 3.0: Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke. (2008) 39:2477–84. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
    1. Mulder M, Nijland R. Stroke impact scale. J Physiother. (2016) 62:117. 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.002
    1. Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GDE, Carod-Artal FJ, et al. . Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0. J Cardiov Nurs. (2015) 30:229–41. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145
    1. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Liuzzo DM, Newman-Norlund R, Herter TM. Using clinical and robotic assessment tools to examine the feasibility of pairing tDCS with upper extremity physical therapy in patients with stroke and TBI: a consideration-of-concept pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. (2014) 35:741–54. 10.3233/NRE-141178
    1. Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen. (2012) 141:2–18. 10.1037/a0024338
    1. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psychol Bull. (1992) 112:155–9. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
    1. Schoenfeld D. Statistical considerations for pilot studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (1980) 6:371–4. 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90153-4
    1. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. (1988) 19:1497–500. 10.1161/01.STR.19.12.1497
    1. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prog Scot Med J. (1957) 2:200–15. 10.1177/003693305700200504
    1. World Health Organization (2001).International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Cortese F, Zampolini M, et al. . Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med. (2009) 41:1016–20. 10.2340/16501977-0459
    1. Hwang R, Mandrusiak A, Morris NR, Peters R, Korczyk D, Bruning J, et al. . Exploring patient experiences and perspectives of a heart failure telerehabilitation program: A mixed methods approach. Heart and Lung. (2017) 46:320–7. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.03.004
    1. Crotty M, Killington M, van den Berg M, Morris C, Taylor A, Carati C. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J. Telemed. Telecare. (2014) 20:370–76. 10.1177/1357633X14552382
    1. Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, Crotty M. ‘Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it': older rehabilitation patients' experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. (2017) 20:120–9. 10.1111/hex.12443
    1. Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:105–18. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2
    1. Lainay C, Benzenine E, Durier J, Daubail B, Giroud M, Quantin C, et al. . Hospitalization within the first year after stroke: the Dijon stroke registry. Stroke. (2015) 46:190–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007429
    1. Saverino C, Swaine B, Jaglal S, Lewko J, Vernich L, Voth J, et al. . Rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2016) 97:S19–25. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.016
    1. Chan V, Zagorski B, Parsons D, Colantonio A. Older adults with acquired brain injury: a population based study. BMC Geriatr. (2013) 13:97. 10.1186/1471-2318-13-97
    1. Cameron C, Edwards H, Martini Using the CO-OP approach: involving parents and others in the process. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP Approach™ to Enable Participation Across the Life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 161–76.
    1. Levack WM, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM. Goal planning for adults with acquired brain injury: How clinicians talk about involving family. Brain Inj. (2009) 23:192–202. 10.1080/02699050802695582
    1. Lutz BJ, Young ME. Rethinking intervention strategies in stroke family caregiving. Rehabil Nurs. (2010) 35:152–60. 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2010.tb00041.x
    1. Cameron JI, Naglie G, Silver FL, Gignac MA. Stroke family caregivers' support needs change across the care continuum: a qualitative study using the timing it right framework. Disabil Rehabi. (2013) 35:315–24. 10.3109/09638288.2012.691937
    1. Ko JY, Aycock DM, Clark PC. A comparison of working versus nonworking family caregivers of stroke survivors. J Neurosci Nurs. (2007) 39:217–25. 10.1097/01376517-200708000-00006
    1. Dawson DR, Hunt AW, Polatajko HJ. Using the CO-OP approach: traumatic brain injury. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP ApproachTM to Enable Participation Across the Life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 135–60.
    1. McEwen SF, Poulin V, Skidmore ER, Wolf TJ. Using the CO-OP approach: stroke. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP ApproachTM to Enable Participation Across the Life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 207–26.
    1. McEwen SF, Houldin A. Generalization and transfer in the CO-OP approach. In: Dawson DR, McEwen SF, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy: Using the CO-OP ApproachTM to Enable Participation Across the Life Span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; (2017). p. 31–42.
    1. Martinsen U, Bentzen H, Holter MK, Nilsen T, Skullerud H, Mowinckel P, et al. . The effect of occupational therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Occup Ther. (2017) 24:89–97. 10.3109/11038128.2016.1158316
    1. Rotenberg-Shpigelman S, Erez AB-H, Nahaloni I, Maeir A. Neurofunctional treatment targeting participation among chronic stroke survivors: A pilot randomised controlled study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. (2012) 22:532–49. 10.1080/09602011.2012.665610

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel