A real-world, observational study of erenumab for migraine prevention in Canadian patients

Werner J Becker, Sian Spacey, Elizabeth Leroux, Rose Giammarco, Jonathan Gladstone, Suzanne Christie, Arash Akaberi, G Sarah Power, Jagdeep K Minhas, Johanna Mancini, Driss Rochdi, Ayca Filiz, Natacha Bastien, Werner J Becker, Sian Spacey, Elizabeth Leroux, Rose Giammarco, Jonathan Gladstone, Suzanne Christie, Arash Akaberi, G Sarah Power, Jagdeep K Minhas, Johanna Mancini, Driss Rochdi, Ayca Filiz, Natacha Bastien

Abstract

Objectives: To assess real-world effectiveness, safety, and usage of erenumab in Canadian patients with episodic and chronic migraine with prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.

Background: In randomized controlled trials, erenumab demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention in patients with ≤4 prior ineffective prophylactic migraine therapies. The "Migraine prevention with AimoviG: Informative Canadian real-world study" (MAGIC) assessed real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Canadian patients with migraine.

Methods: MAGIC was a prospective open-label, observational study conducted in Canadian patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) with two to six categories of prior ineffective prophylactic therapies. Participants were administered 70 mg or 140 mg erenumab monthly based on physician's assessment. Migraine attacks were self-assessed using an electronic diary and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) after the 3-month treatment period.

Results: Among the 95 participants who mostly experienced two (54.7%) or three (32.6%) prior categories of ineffective prophylactic therapies and who initiated erenumab, treatment was generally safe and well tolerated; 89/95 (93.7%) participants initiated treatment with 140 mg erenumab. At week 12, 32/95 (33.7%) participants including 17/64 (26.6%) CM and 15/32 (48.4%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD while 30/86 (34.9%) participants including 19/55 (34.5%) CM and 11/31 (35.5%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD at week 24. Through patient-reported outcome questionnaires, 62/95 (65.3%) and 45/86 (52.3%) participants reported improvement of their condition at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Physicians observed improvement in the condition of 78/95 (82.1%) and 67/86 (77.9%) participants at weeks 12 and 24, respectively.

Conclusion: One-third of patients with EM and CM achieved ≥50% MMD reduction after 3 months of erenumab treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness, safety, and usage for migraine prevention in adult Canadian patients with multiple prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.

Keywords: chronic migraine; effectiveness; episodic migraine; erenumab; real-world.

Conflict of interest statement

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. funded the study. The sponsor was involved in the design, interpretation, and reporting of study results. AA and GSP were full‐time employees of IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. at the time of the study. JKM and JM are full‐time employees of IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. DR, AF, and NB are full‐time employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. WJB has served on medical advisory boards or received speaker honoraria from Allergan, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Weber and Weber, Teva, Eli Lilly, and Lundbeck. SS has received speaker honoraria from Abbvie, Miravo, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva, Eli Lilly, and Lundbeck. RG has served on medical advisory boards or received speaker honoraria from Allergan, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva, Eli Lilly, and Lundbeck. EL, JG, and SC have received consultation fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

© 2022 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design. *70 mg or 140 mg erenumab decided at the prescribing physician’s discretion
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Subject disposition

References

    1. Dodick DW. Migraine. Lancet. 2018;391:1315‐1330.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS‐II). Headache. 2013;53:644‐655.
    1. Wang X, Yue TL, Barone FC, et al. Discovery of adrenomedullin in rat ischemic cortex and evidence for its role in exacerbating focal brain ischemic damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11480‐11484.
    1. Zimmermann U, Fischer JA, Frei K, Fischer AH, Reinscheid RK, Muff R. Identification of adrenomedullin receptors in cultured rat astrocytes and in neuroblastboma x glioma hybrid cells (NG108‐15). Brain Res. 1996;724:238‐245.
    1. Durham PL. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) and migraine. Headache. 2006;46(suppl 1):S3‐S8.
    1. Shi L, Lehto SG, Zhu DXD, et al. Pharmacologic characterization of AMG 334, a potent and selective human monoclonal antibody against the calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016;356:223‐231.
    1. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1026‐1037.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2123‐2132.
    1. Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:425‐434.
    1. Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, et al. Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:382‐390.
    1. Broessner G, Reuter U, Bonner JH, et al. The spectrum of response to erenumab in patients with episodic migraine and subgroup analysis of patients achieving >/=50%, >/=75%, and 100% response. Headache. 2020;60:2026‐2040.
    1. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri‐Minet M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two‐to‐four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392:2280‐2287.
    1. Ashina M, Tepper S, Brandes JL, et al. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1611‐1621.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1‐211.
    1. Jhingran P, Osterhaus JT, Miller DW, Lee JT, Kirchdoerfer L. Development and validation of the Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Headache. 1998;38:295‐302.
    1. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs; 1976.
    1. Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:26‐35.
    1. Stewart WF, Wood C, Reed ML, Roy J, Lipton RB, AMPP Advisory Group . Cumulative lifetime migraine incidence in women and men. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:1170‐1178.
    1. Queiroz LP, Peres M, Piovesan EJ, et al. A nationwide population‐based study of migraine in Brazil. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:642‐649.
    1. Kim BK, Chung YK, Kim JM, Lee KS, Chu MK. Prevalence, clinical characteristics and disability of migraine and probable migraine: a nationwide population‐based survey in Korea. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:1106‐1116.
    1. Eghtesadi M, Leroux E, Pagé G. Real‐life response to erenumab in a therapy‐resistant case series of migraine patients from the Province of Québec, Eastern Canada. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41:733‐739.
    1. Robblee J, Devick KL, Mendez N, Potter J, Slonaker J, Starling AJ. Real‐world patient experience with erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Headache. 2020;60:2014‐2025.
    1. Zhu C, Guan J, Xiao H, Luo W, Tong R. Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e18483.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel