Rapid and reversible recruitment of early visual cortex for touch

Lotfi B Merabet, Roy Hamilton, Gottfried Schlaug, Jascha D Swisher, Elaine T Kiriakopoulos, Naomi B Pitskel, Thomas Kauffman, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Lotfi B Merabet, Roy Hamilton, Gottfried Schlaug, Jascha D Swisher, Elaine T Kiriakopoulos, Naomi B Pitskel, Thomas Kauffman, Alvaro Pascual-Leone

Abstract

Background: The loss of vision has been associated with enhanced performance in non-visual tasks such as tactile discrimination and sound localization. Current evidence suggests that these functional gains are linked to the recruitment of the occipital visual cortex for non-visual processing, but the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these crossmodal changes remain uncertain. One possible explanation is that visual deprivation is associated with an unmasking of non-visual input into visual cortex.

Methodology/principal findings: We investigated the effect of sudden, complete and prolonged visual deprivation (five days) in normally sighted adult individuals while they were immersed in an intensive tactile training program. Following the five-day period, blindfolded subjects performed better on a Braille character discrimination task. In the blindfold group, serial fMRI scans revealed an increase in BOLD signal within the occipital cortex in response to tactile stimulation after five days of complete visual deprivation. This increase in signal was no longer present 24 hours after blindfold removal. Finally, reversible disruption of occipital cortex function on the fifth day (by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS) impaired Braille character recognition ability in the blindfold group but not in non-blindfolded controls. This disruptive effect was no longer evident once the blindfold had been removed for 24 hours.

Conclusions/significance: Overall, our findings suggest that sudden and complete visual deprivation in normally sighted individuals can lead to profound, but rapidly reversible, neuroplastic changes by which the occipital cortex becomes engaged in processing of non-visual information. The speed and dynamic nature of the observed changes suggests that normally inhibited or masked functions in the sighted are revealed by visual loss. The unmasking of pre-existing connections and shifts in connectivity represent rapid, early plastic changes, which presumably can lead, if sustained and reinforced, to slower developing, but more permanent structural changes, such as the establishment of new neural connections in the blind.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Study design.
Figure 1. Study design.
(a) Subjects were randomized to a blindfolded or non blindfolded group. Tactile behavioral assessments were obtained at day 1 and day 5. Both groups were immersed in an intensive tactile stimulation program that included formal Braille instruction. A subset of subjects participated in a neuroimaging study on day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 6 (i.e. 24 hours after blindfold removal) and a different subset of subjects participated in a TMS study (day 5 and day 6) (b) Photograph of a subject wearing the blindfold used in the study.
Figure 2. Behavioral results.
Figure 2. Behavioral results.
Group performance assessing touch thresholds with (a) von Frey Hairs and (b) tactile spatial acuity with JVP Domes over the course of the study. Performance is separated by right and left hand (blindfold: filled symbols, non blindfold: open symbols). Overall performance improved over the course of the study period in both the blindfold and blindfold groups.
Figure 3. Behavioral results.
Figure 3. Behavioral results.
Group performance on the Braille character discrimination task for both study groups over the course of the study. (a) Performance separated by right and left hand. Note that there is an overall improvement (decrease in error rate) over the five day period in both study groups. (b) Performance separated by day of study. Note that on day 1 of the study, no statistical significance in performance was observed between the groups however performance for the right (trained) hand was significantly better for the blindfold group compared to non blindfold controls after 5 days of blindfolding (* = p

Figure 4. Neuroimaging results.

(a) Differential tactile…

Figure 4. Neuroimaging results.

(a) Differential tactile activation maps contrasting the blindfold and non blindfold…

Figure 4. Neuroimaging results.
(a) Differential tactile activation maps contrasting the blindfold and non blindfold groups are shown for each fMRI session of the study. (b) A region of interest (ROI) was defined by the area of occipital activation found on day 5 in the group maps. The average differential tactile activity between groups in this ROI is plotted here in z-score units across days of the study. The difference between groups was significant on day 5, as expected from the definition of the ROI, but did not reach significance on any other day.

Figure 5. Effect of TMS on Braille…

Figure 5. Effect of TMS on Braille discrimination.

The effect of 1Hz rTMS on Braille…

Figure 5. Effect of TMS on Braille discrimination.
The effect of 1Hz rTMS on Braille discrimination ability (% error rate) is compared to baseline performance, sham stimulation and after a 10 min washout period. On day 5 (part a), rTMS (but not sham) had a significant effect on Braille character discrimination in the blindfold group (filled symbols) but not in the non blindfolded group (open symbols) (* = 
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Amedi A, Raz N, Pianka P, Malach R, Zohary E. Early ‘visual’ cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:758–766. - PubMed
    1. Gougoux F, Lepore F, Lassonde M, Voss P, Zatorre RJ, et al. Neuropsychology: pitch discrimination in the early blind. Nature. 2004;430:309. - PubMed
    1. Kujala T, Huotilainen M, Sinkkonen J, Ahonen AI, Alho K, et al. Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci Lett. 1995;183:143–146. - PubMed
    1. Roder B, Stock O, Bien S, Neville H, Rosler F. Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:930–936. - PubMed
    1. Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Ibanez V, Deiber MP, et al. Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature. 1996;380:526–528. - PubMed
Show all 62 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 4. Neuroimaging results.
Figure 4. Neuroimaging results.
(a) Differential tactile activation maps contrasting the blindfold and non blindfold groups are shown for each fMRI session of the study. (b) A region of interest (ROI) was defined by the area of occipital activation found on day 5 in the group maps. The average differential tactile activity between groups in this ROI is plotted here in z-score units across days of the study. The difference between groups was significant on day 5, as expected from the definition of the ROI, but did not reach significance on any other day.
Figure 5. Effect of TMS on Braille…
Figure 5. Effect of TMS on Braille discrimination.
The effect of 1Hz rTMS on Braille discrimination ability (% error rate) is compared to baseline performance, sham stimulation and after a 10 min washout period. On day 5 (part a), rTMS (but not sham) had a significant effect on Braille character discrimination in the blindfold group (filled symbols) but not in the non blindfolded group (open symbols) (* = 

References

    1. Amedi A, Raz N, Pianka P, Malach R, Zohary E. Early ‘visual’ cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:758–766.
    1. Gougoux F, Lepore F, Lassonde M, Voss P, Zatorre RJ, et al. Neuropsychology: pitch discrimination in the early blind. Nature. 2004;430:309.
    1. Kujala T, Huotilainen M, Sinkkonen J, Ahonen AI, Alho K, et al. Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci Lett. 1995;183:143–146.
    1. Roder B, Stock O, Bien S, Neville H, Rosler F. Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:930–936.
    1. Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Ibanez V, Deiber MP, et al. Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature. 1996;380:526–528.
    1. Stevens AA, Snodgrass M, Schwartz D, Weaver K. Preparatory activity in occipital cortex in early blind humans predicts auditory perceptual performance. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10734–10741.
    1. Bavelier D, Neville HJ. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:443–452.
    1. Sadato N. Cross-modal plasticity in the blind revealed by functional neuroimaging. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;59:75–79.
    1. Sathian K. Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. Dev Psychobiol. 2005;46:279–286.
    1. Theoret H, Merabet L, Pascual-Leone A. Behavioral and neuroplastic changes in the blind: evidence for functionally relevant cross-modal interactions. J Physiol Paris. 2004;98:221–233.
    1. Amedi A, Jacobson G, Hendler T, Malach R, Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:1202–1212.
    1. Buchel C, Price C, Frackowiak RS, Friston K. Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain. 1998;121(Pt 3):409–419.
    1. Burton H, McLaren DG, Sinclair RJ. Reading embossed capital letters: an fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:325–339.
    1. Burton H, Sinclair RJ, McLaren DG. Cortical activity to vibrotactile stimulation: an fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004;23:210–228.
    1. Burton H, Snyder AZ, Conturo TE, Akbudak E, Ollinger JM, et al. Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:589–607.
    1. Burton H, Snyder AZ, Diamond JB, Raichle ME. Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a FMRI study of verb generation to heard nouns. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:3359–3371.
    1. Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Deiber MP, Ibanez V, et al. Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind. Brain. 1998;121(Pt 7):1213–1229.
    1. Pietrini P, Furey ML, Ricciardi E, Gobbini MI, Wu WH, et al. Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5658–5663.
    1. Goldreich D, Kanics IM. Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3439–3445.
    1. Goldreich D, Kanics IM. Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task. Percept Psychophys. 2006;68:1363–1371.
    1. Grant AC, Thiagarajah MC, Sathian K. Tactile perception in blind Braille readers: a psychophysical study of acuity and hyperacuity using gratings and dot patterns. Percept Psychophys. 2000;62:301–312.
    1. Van Boven RW, Hamilton RH, Kauffman T, Keenan JP, Pascual-Leone A. Tactile spatial resolution in blind braille readers. Neurology. 2000;54:2230–2236.
    1. Van Boven RW, Ingeholm JE, Beauchamp MS, Bikle PC, Ungerleider LG. Tactile form and location processing in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12601–12605.
    1. Hamilton R, Keenan JP, Catala M, Pascual-Leone A. Alexia for Braille following bilateral occipital stroke in an early blind woman. Neuroreport. 2000;11:237–240.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Tarazona F, Keenan J, Tormos JM, Hamilton R, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:207–217.
    1. Cohen LG, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, Corwell B, Falz L, et al. Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature. 1997;389:180–183.
    1. Kupers R, Pappens M, de Noordhout AM, Schoenen J, Ptito M, et al. rTMS of the occipital cortex abolishes Braille reading and repetition priming in blind subjects. Neurology. 2007;68:691–693.
    1. Cohen Kadosh R, Walsh V. Cognitive neuroscience: rewired or crosswired brains? Curr Biol. 2006;16:R962–963.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401.
    1. Clavagnier S, Falchier A, Kennedy H. Long-distance feedback projections to area V1: implications for multisensory integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004;4:117–126.
    1. Falchier A, Clavagnier S, Barone P, Kennedy H. Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5749–5759.
    1. Rockland KS, Ojima H. Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;50:19–26.
    1. Schroeder CE, Foxe J. Multisensory contributions to low-level, ‘unisensory’ processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:454–458.
    1. Wittenberg GF, Werhahn KJ, Wassermann EM, Herscovitch P, Cohen LG. Functional connectivity between somatosensory and visual cortex in early blind humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:1923–1927.
    1. Prather SC, Sathian K. Mental rotation of tactile stimuli. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002;14:91–98.
    1. Stoesz MR, Zhang M, Weisser VD, Prather SC, Mao H, et al. Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;50:41–49.
    1. Zhang M, Mariola E, Stilla R, Stoesz M, Mao H, et al. Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:370–377.
    1. Deibert E, Kraut M, Kremen S, Hart J., Jr Neural pathways in tactile object recognition. Neurology. 1999;52:1413–1417.
    1. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, et al. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1706–1714.
    1. Macaluso E, Frith CD, Driver J. Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science. 2000;289:1206–1208.
    1. Merabet L, Thut G, Murray B, Andrews J, Hsiao S, et al. Feeling by sight or seeing by touch? Neuron. 2004;42:173–179.
    1. Merabet LB, Swisher JD, McMains SA, Halko MA, Amedi A, et al. Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1633–1641.
    1. Ramos-Estebanez C, Merabet LB, Machii K, Fregni F, Thut G, et al. Visual phosphene perception modulated by subthreshold crossmodal sensory stimulation. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4178–4181.
    1. Zangaladze A, Epstein CM, Grafton ST, Sathian K. Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature. 1999;401:587–590.
    1. Pitskel NB, Merabet LB, Ramos-Estebanez C, Kauffman T, Pascual-Leone A. Time-dependent changes in cortical excitability after prolonged visual deprivation. Neuroreport. 2007;18:1703–1707.
    1. Kauffman T, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Braille character discrimination in blindfolded human subjects. Neuroreport. 2002;13:571–574.
    1. Merabet LB, Maguire D, Warde A, Alterescu K, Stickgold R, et al. Visual hallucinations during prolonged blindfolding in sighted subjects. J Neuroophthalmol. 2004;24:109–113.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Hamilton R. The metamodal organization of the brain. Prog Brain Res. 2001;134:427–445.
    1. Sur M, Leamey CA. Development and plasticity of cortical areas and networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:251–262.
    1. Cappe C, Barone P. Heteromodal connections supporting multisensory integration at low levels of cortical processing in the monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:2886–2902.
    1. Negyessy L, Nepusz T, Kocsis L, Bazso F. Prediction of the main cortical areas and connections involved in the tactile function of the visual cortex by network analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:1919–1930.
    1. Sadato N. How the blind “see” Braille: lessons from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:577–582.
    1. Sathian K, Burton H. The role of spatially selective attention in the tactile perception of texture. Percept Psychophys. 1991;50:237–248.
    1. Sathian K, Zangaladze A, Hoffman JM, Grafton ST. Feeling with the mind's eye. Neuroreport. 1997;8:3877–3881.
    1. Hamilton R, Pascual-Leone A. Cortical Plasticity Associated with Braille Learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998:168–174.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Torres F. Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain. 1993;116(Pt 1):39–52.
    1. Hollins M, Kelley EK. Spatial updating in blind and sighted people. Percept Psychophys. 1988;43:380–388.
    1. Carroll TJ. Blindness: what it is, what it does, and how to live with it. Boston: Little; 1961. p. 382.
    1. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113.
    1. Johansson RS, Vallbo AB, Westling G. Thresholds of mechanosensitive afferents in the human hand as measured with von Frey hairs. Brain Res. 1980;184:343–351.
    1. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, et al. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:636–647.
    1. Gugino LD, Romero JR, Aglio L, Titone D, Ramirez M, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1781–1792.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel