Functional stroke outcomes after mobile stroke unit deployment - the revised protocol for the Berlin Prehospital Or Usual Delivery of acute stroke care (B_PROUD) part 2 study

Peter Harmel, Martin Ebinger, Erik Freitag, Ulrike Grittner, Irina Lorenz-Meyer, Ira Napierkowski, Christian H Nolte, Bob Siegerink, Heinrich J Audebert, Peter Harmel, Martin Ebinger, Erik Freitag, Ulrike Grittner, Irina Lorenz-Meyer, Ira Napierkowski, Christian H Nolte, Bob Siegerink, Heinrich J Audebert

Abstract

Background: Studies investigating the Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) concept have shown increased thrombolysis rates, reduced alarm-to-treatment times and improved prehospital triage. Yet, so far, there is no definite scientific proof of better functional outcome after MSU deployment compared to regular ambulances.

Methods: We provide a revised protocol for the second part of the B_PROUD trial as organization of the MSU dispatch did not meet the anticipated standards in the first part. B_PROUD is a pragmatic, prospective study comparing functional outcomes of treatment candidates with or without MSU care. Treatment candidates are defined as patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, onset-to-dispatch-times ≤4 h, disabling symptoms not resolved at time of ambulance arrival, and the ability to ambulate prior to the qualifying event. These patients are included if their emergency call prompted a stroke alarm at the dispatch center during MSU operation hours (7 am-11 pm, Monday-Sunday) and if the emergency is located within the MSU operation area in Berlin, Germany. The intervention group consists of patients who are cared for by the MSU. When the MSU is already in operation for another emergency, MSU dispatches are handled by regular ambulances (about 45%). These dispatches create the control group. Blinded stroke physicians assess the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in recorded structured interviews 3 months after stroke. The primary outcome is the degree of disability and death over the full range of the mRS. As a change to the previously published protocol and only pertinent in case of more than 9% lost-to-follow-up, a co-primary outcome was introduced consisting of the proportions of death, new institutional care or severe disability in patients with additional use of information from registration offices.

Perspective: The results will inform parties involved in acute stroke care organization on the effectiveness of the MSU concept.

Trial registration: The protocol is registered in (NCT03931616) and has been approved by the ethical review committee of the Charité - University Medicine Berlin (EA4/109/15) on September 2, 2015. The study protocol of B_PROUD part 1 had been published in the International Journal of Stroke as "Berlin Prehospital Or Usual Delivery of acute stroke care (B_PROUD) - study protocol" (doi: 10.1177/1747493017700152) on March 22, 2017 [1] previous to first patient's registration.

Keywords: Endovascular thrombectomy; Functional outcome; Mobile stroke unit; Prehospital; Stroke; Thrombolysis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© The Author(s) 2019.

References

    1. Ebinger M, Harmel P, Nolte CH, Grittner U, Siegerink B, Audebert HJ. Berlin prehospital or usual delivery of acute stroke care – Study protocol. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(6):653–658. doi: 10.1177/1747493017700152.
    1. Saver JL. Time is brain - quantified. Stroke. 2006;37(1):263–266. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab.
    1. Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A, Keller I, Lesmeister M, Schlechtriemen T, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(5):397–404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70057-1.
    1. Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, Weber JE, Waldschmidt C, Rozanski M, et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1622–1631. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2850.
    1. Wendt M, Ebinger M, Kunz A, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE, et al. Improved prehospital triage of patients with stroke in a specialized stroke ambulance. Stroke. 2015;46(3):740–745. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008159.
    1. Audebert H, Fassbender K, Hussain MS, Ebinger M, Turc G, Uchino K, et al. The PRE-hospital stroke treatment organization. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(9):932–940. doi: 10.1177/1747493017729268.
    1. Kunz A, Ebinger M, Geisler F, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE, et al. Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: An observational registry study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1035–1043. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30129-6.
    1. Nolte CH, Ebinger M, Scheitz JF, Kunz A, Erdur H, Geisler F, et al. Effects of prehospital thrombolysis in stroke patients with Prestroke dependency. Stroke. 2018;49(3):646–651. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019060.
    1. Krebes S, Ebinger M, Baumann AM, Kellner PA, Rozanski M, Doepp F, et al. Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. Stroke. 2012;43(3):776–781. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.634980.
    1. Ebinger M, Lindenlaub S, Kunz A, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE, et al. Prehospital thrombolysis: A manual from Berlin. J Vis Exp. 2013;26(81):379150534.
    1. Weber JE, Ebinger M, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Wendt M, Winter B, et al. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute stroke: Results of the PHANTOM-S pilot study. Neurology. 2013;80(2):163–168. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827b90e5.
    1. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009;4(3):200–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00271.x.
    1. Scherer R. Sample Size Calculation for Various t-Tests and Wilcoxon-Test. 2016.
    1. Bowry R, Parker S, Rajan SS, Yamal JM, Wu TC, Richardson L, et al. Benefits of stroke treatment using a mobile stroke unit compared with standard management: The BEST-MSU study run-in phase. Stroke. 2015;46(12):3370–3374. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011093.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel