Meditation involving people with cancer, medical staff and witnesses: a pilot study exploring improvement in wellness and connectedness

V Prevost, Bénédicte Clarisse, Alexandra Leconte, Claire Delorme, Sandrine Benoit, Titi Tran, V Prevost, Bénédicte Clarisse, Alexandra Leconte, Claire Delorme, Sandrine Benoit, Titi Tran

Abstract

Introduction: Mindfulness meditation is likely to promote better management of stress, pain and negative emotions. We propose to address the benefit of meditation in an open setting associating people with cancer (target population), medical staff and witnesses (neither patient nor medical staff). This study aims (1) to evaluate the effects of meditation on wellness improvement and (2) to identify criteria and modalities for a subsequent randomised study.

Methods and analysis: We propose a longitudinal pilot study consisting of a non-randomised experimental preintervention/postintervention survey. The intervention consists in delivering a meditation programme (12 weekly meditation sessions of 1.5 hours each), specifically adapted to our target population and addressing our research hypothesis in an open setting involving people with cancer, medical staff and witnesses (equally distributed in two groups of 15 participants). The main objective is to evaluate participants' adherence to the programme. The effects of meditation will be evaluated on stress, quality of life, feeling of personal effectiveness, on the development of mindfulness and empathy, and on satisfaction and perception of a change in quality of life. We will also measure the putative added value of 'meditating together'. This study is expected to allow validating the evaluation tools and refining the modalities of the workshops. We expect to demonstrate the evolution that this meditation-based intervention induces in the participants. We aim to promote bridge-building, between patients, medical staff but also others. In this way, one's own suffering may be understood in the light of others' suffering, thereby promoting the sense of otherness and giving insights into 'living better with'. This exploratory study will investigate the relevance of this hypothesis, which could then be explored by a randomised study.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est II). Trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT04410185.

Keywords: cancer pain; complementary medicine; oncology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cluster of arguments in favour of ‘meditating together’ hypothesis. CAM, complementary alternative medicines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study design.

References

    1. Institut National du CAncer . VICAN5, 2018. Available: [Accessed Dec 2020].
    1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Hochstenbach LMJ, Joosten EAJ, et al. . Update on prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016;51:1070–90. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340
    1. Yates M, Samuel V. Burnout in oncologists and associated factors: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care 2019;28:e13094. 10.1111/ecc.13094
    1. Santorelli S. Guéris-toi toi-même : ce que la méditation apporte la médecine. Paris: Editions des Arènes, 2017.
    1. Fleury C. Le soin est un humanisme. Tracts Gallimard N°6. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 2019.
    1. De Hennezel M, Gutton P. Et si vieillir libérait la tendresse… Collection Old'up : inventer sa vieillesse. Paris, 2019.
    1. NCCIH . Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: What’s name? Available: [Accessed Dec 2020].
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2003;10:144–56. 10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
    1. Bernard M, Zimmermann G, Favez N. Which place for positive psychology in psychotherapy? theoretical and empirical perspectives. Prat psychol 2011;17:301–13.
    1. Duncan M, Moschopoulou E, Herrington E, et al. . Review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life in cancer survivors. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015860. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015860
    1. Xunlin NG, Lau Y, Klainin-Yobas P. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2020;28:1563–78. 10.1007/s00520-019-05219-9
    1. Zhang Q, Zhao H, Zheng Y. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2019;27:771–81. 10.1007/s00520-018-4570-x
    1. Carlson LE, Zelinski E, Toivonen K, et al. . Mind-Body therapies in cancer: what is the latest evidence? Curr Oncol Rep 2017;19:67. 10.1007/s11912-017-0626-1
    1. Bosacki C, Vallard A, Gras M, et al. . [Complementary and alternative medicines in cancer patients]. Bull Cancer 2019;106:479–91. 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.02.011
    1. Baer R, Crane C, Miller E, et al. . Doing no harm in mindfulness-based programs: conceptual issues and empirical findings. Clin Psychol Rev 2019;71:101–14. 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.001
    1. Schlosser M, Sparby T, Vörös S, et al. . Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations. PLoS One 2019;14:e0216643. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216643
    1. Dobkin PL, Bernardi NF, Bagnis CI. Enhancing clinicians' well-being and patient-centered care through mindfulness. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2016;36:11–16. 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000021
    1. Spinelli C, Wisener M, Khoury B. Mindfulness training for healthcare professionals and trainees: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychosom Res 2019;120:29–38. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.03.003
    1. Burton A, Burgess C, Dean S, et al. . How effective are Mindfulness-Based interventions for reducing stress among healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stress Health 2017;33:3–13. 10.1002/smi.2673
    1. Tribonnière dela. Être en relation avec Le patient. In: Pratiquer l'éducation thérapeutique. 4. Chapitre: Elsevier Masson SAS, 2016: 35–42.
    1. Poisnel G, Arenaza-Urquijo E, Collette F, et al. . The Age-Well randomized controlled trial of the Medit-Ageing European project: effect of meditation or foreign language training on brain and mental health in older adults. Alzheimers Dement 2018;4:714–23. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.011
    1. Conroy T, Guillemin F, Kaminsky MC. [Measure of quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: techniques and main results]. Rev Med Interne 2002;23:703–16.
    1. edQuintard B. Du stress objectif au stress perçu. In: Introduction la psychologie de la santé. M. Bruchon-Schweitzer et R. Dantzer. Paris: PUF, 1994: 43–66.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385–96. 10.2307/2136404
    1. Fischer D, et al. . Capturing the Patient’s View of Change as a Clinical Outcome Measure. JAMA 1999;282:1157–62. 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157
    1. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav 1981;2:99–113. 10.1002/job.4030020205
    1. Alain & Gévry . Maslach Burnout Inventory. In: Traduction Française. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1986.
    1. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON, 1995: 35–7.
    1. Dumont M, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. French Adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale - Auto-efficacité Généralisée, Berlin, Germany 2000.
    1. Trousselard M, Steiler D, Claverie D. How to assess mindfulness? Problems and future]. Encephale 2016;42:99–104.
    1. Buchheld N, Grossman P, Walach H. Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). J Medit Medit Res 2001;1:5–23.
    1. Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmüller V, et al. . Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Pers Individ Dif 2006;40:1543–55. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025
    1. Trousselard M, Steiler D, Raphel C. Validation of a French version of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI) – short version: relationships between mindfulness and stress in an adult population. Bio Psycho Soc Med 2010;4:1–8.
    1. Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Available: [Accessed Dec 2020].
    1. Gilet A-L, Mella N, Studer J, et al. . Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: a French validation of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). Can J Behav Sci 2013;45:42–8. 10.1037/a0030425
    1. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. . The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas 2001;61:349–65. 10.1177/00131640121971158
    1. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, et al. . Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1563–9. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563
    1. Zenasni F, Boujut E, Bluffel du Vaure C. Development of a French language version of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy and association with practice characteristics and burnout in a sample of general practitioners. Int J Pers Cent Med 2012;2:759–66.
    1. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299–302. 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel