Fasting mimicking diet as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in the multicentre randomized phase 2 DIRECT trial

Stefanie de Groot, Rieneke T Lugtenberg, Danielle Cohen, Marij J P Welters, Ilina Ehsan, Maaike P G Vreeswijk, Vincent T H B M Smit, Hiltje de Graaf, Joan B Heijns, Johanneke E A Portielje, Agnes J van de Wouw, Alex L T Imholz, Lonneke W Kessels, Suzan Vrijaldenhoven, Arnold Baars, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Marjolijn Duijm-de Carpentier, Hein Putter, Jacobus J M van der Hoeven, Johan W R Nortier, Valter D Longo, Hanno Pijl, Judith R Kroep, Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Hiltje de Graaf, Joan B Heijns, Johanneke E A Portielje, Agnes J van de Wouw, Alex L T Imholz, Lonneke W Kessels, Suzan Vrijaldenhoven, Arnold Baars, Emine Göker, Anke J M Pas, Aafke H Honkoop, A Elise van Leeuwen-Stok, Judith R Kroep, Stefanie de Groot, Rieneke T Lugtenberg, Danielle Cohen, Marij J P Welters, Ilina Ehsan, Maaike P G Vreeswijk, Vincent T H B M Smit, Hiltje de Graaf, Joan B Heijns, Johanneke E A Portielje, Agnes J van de Wouw, Alex L T Imholz, Lonneke W Kessels, Suzan Vrijaldenhoven, Arnold Baars, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Marjolijn Duijm-de Carpentier, Hein Putter, Jacobus J M van der Hoeven, Johan W R Nortier, Valter D Longo, Hanno Pijl, Judith R Kroep, Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Hiltje de Graaf, Joan B Heijns, Johanneke E A Portielje, Agnes J van de Wouw, Alex L T Imholz, Lonneke W Kessels, Suzan Vrijaldenhoven, Arnold Baars, Emine Göker, Anke J M Pas, Aafke H Honkoop, A Elise van Leeuwen-Stok, Judith R Kroep

Abstract

Short-term fasting protects tumor-bearing mice against the toxic effects of chemotherapy while enhancing therapeutic efficacy. We randomized 131 patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer, without diabetes and a BMI over 18 kg m-2, to receive either a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) or their regular diet for 3 days prior to and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we show that there was no difference in toxicity between both groups, despite the fact that dexamethasone was omitted in the FMD group. A radiologically complete or partial response occurs more often in patients using the FMD (OR 3.168, P = 0.039). Moreover, per-protocol analysis reveals that the Miller&Payne 4/5 pathological response, indicating 90-100% tumor-cell loss, is more likely to occur in patients using the FMD (OR 4.109, P = 0.016). Also, the FMD significantly curtails chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in T-lymphocytes. These positive findings encourage further exploration of the benefits of fasting/FMD in cancer therapy. Trial number: NCT02126449.

Conflict of interest statement

V.D.L. has equity interest in L-Nutra. H.P. has shares in a company that invested in L-Nutra. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. Consort diagram of the DIRECT…
Fig. 1. Consort diagram of the DIRECT study.
This figure shows reasons for exclusion from the study and the numbers of patients included in the PP and ITT analyses. Abbreviations: FMD: fasting mimicking diet, ITT: Intention to treat, PP: Per protocol. * diagnosed the day after randomization.
Fig. 2. Tumor response data for the…
Fig. 2. Tumor response data for the ITT and PP analysis.
The pathological response was given for Miller and Payne pathological response score 4/5 (90–100% tumor cell loss) vs. 1/2/3 (less than 90% tumor cell loss). The radiological response was scored according RECIST 1.1 and given for complete response + partial response vs. stable disease + progression disease. Abbreviations: FMD: fasting mimicking diet, ITT: Intention to treat, PP: Per protocol, MP: Miller and Payne, CR: complete response, PR: partial response, SD: stable disease, PD: progression disease. Logistic regression was used (2-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health domain…
Fig. 3. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health domain given for 4 timepoints: before therapy (after randomization), halfway therapy, at the end of therapy and at six months follow-up.
Error bars indicate the 95% CI of the mean. Abbreviations: EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, FMD: fasting mimicking diet. CI: confidence interval. FMD N = 57 and regular diet N = 54. Armitage’s trend test was used. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4. Tumor response data per number…
Fig. 4. Tumor response data per number of cycles completed.
The pathological response was given for Miller and Payne pathological response score 4/5 (90–100% tumor cell loss) vs.1/2/3 (less than 90% tumor cell loss). The radiological response was scored according to RECIST 1.1 and given for complete response + partial response vs. stable disease + progression disease. P-value is given for Armitage’s trend test (2-sided). Abbreviations: FMD: fasting mimicking diet, MP: Miller and Payne, CR: complete response, PR: partial response, SD: stable disease, PD: progression disease. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5. Metabolic and endocrine parameters before…
Fig. 5. Metabolic and endocrine parameters before chemotherapy compared between compliant and non-compliant patients halfway therapy of the FMD group and the regular group.
Values are measured on day −1 or day 0 before cycle 1 and halfway therapy. *P-value <0.05, **P-value <0.001 (2-sided). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (if data was normally distributed) or the 25% and 75% percentiles of the median (if data was non-normally distributed). Independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used. Reference values: glucose 3.1–6.4 mmol/L; insulin 0–20 mU/L; IGF-1 5.4–24.3 nmol/L. Abbreviations: FMD: fasting mimicking diet, IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6. Difference of γ-H2AX intensity in…
Fig. 6. Difference of γ-H2AX intensity in CD45+ CD3+ lymphocytes of each patient before cycle 1 and 3 h after chemotherapy, given as a percentage increase.
Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Independent t-tests were used (2-sided). Abbreviations: FMD: fasting mimicking diet. *P = 0.045. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Lee C, et al. Fasting cycles retard growth of tumors and sensitize a range of cancer cell types to chemotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:124ra127. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003293.
    1. Di Biase S, Longo VD. Fasting-induced differential stress sensitization in cancer treatment. Mol. Cell Oncol. 2016;3:e1117701. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1117701.
    1. Raffaghello L, et al. Starvation-dependent differential stress resistance protects normal but not cancer cells against high-dose chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:8215–8220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708100105.
    1. Huisman SA, et al. Fasting protects against the side-effects of irinotecan treatment but does not abrogate anti-tumor activity in mice. Br. J. Pharm. 2015;173:804–814. doi: 10.1111/bph.13317.
    1. de Groot S, Pijl H, van der Hoeven JJM, Kroep JR. Effects of short-term fasting on cancer treatment. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:209. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1189-9.
    1. Thissen JP, Ketelslegers JM, Underwood LE. Nutritional regulation of the insulin-like growth factors. Endocr. Rev. 1994;15:80–101.
    1. Pollak M. Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Best. Pr. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;22:625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.08.004.
    1. Cahill G, Jr., Felig P, Owen O, Wahren J. Metabolic adaptation to prolonged starvation in man. Nord. Med. 1970;83:89.
    1. Brandhorst S, et al. A periodic diet that mimics fasting promotes multi-system regeneration, enhanced cognitive performance, and healthspan. Cell Metab. 2015;22:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.012.
    1. Nencioni A, Caffa I, Cortellino S, Longo VD. Fasting and cancer: molecular mechanisms and clinical application. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:707–719. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0061-0.
    1. de Groot S, et al. The effects of short-term fasting on tolerance to (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a randomized pilot study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:652. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1663-5.
    1. Dorff TB, et al. Safety and feasibility of fasting in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2370-6.
    1. Safdie FM, et al. Fasting and cancer treatment in humans: a case series report. Aging. 2009;1:988–1007. doi: 10.18632/aging.100114.
    1. Bauersfeld SP, et al. The effects of short-term fasting on quality of life and tolerance to chemotherapy in patients with breast and ovarian cancer: a randomized cross-over pilot study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:476. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4353-2.
    1. Di Biase S, et al. Fasting-mimicking diet reduces HO-1 to promote T cell-mediated tumor cytotoxicity. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.06.005.
    1. Ogston KN, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003;12:320–327. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00106-1.
    1. von Minckwitz G, et al. Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:2676–2685. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.078.
    1. Charehbili A, et al. Addition of zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not enhance tumor response in patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: the NEOZOTAC trial (BOOG 2010-01) Ann. Oncol. 2014;25:998–1004. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu102.
    1. Hickish T, et al. Glucose intolerance during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009;101:537. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp025.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
    1. Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for research and treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
    1. Tuinman MA, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE. Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the distress thermometer. Cancer. 2008;113:870–878. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23622.
    1. Vriens BE, et al. Doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concurrent versus sequential docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with breast cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:3102–3110. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.012.
    1. Martin M, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2302–2313. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043681.
    1. Kahan BC, Morris TP. Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e5840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5840.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel