Adherence to malaria prophylaxis among Peace Corps Volunteers in the Africa region, 2013

Keren Z Landman, Kathrine R Tan, Paul M Arguin, Keren Z Landman, Kathrine R Tan, Paul M Arguin

Abstract

Background: Although malaria can be prevented with prophylaxis, it is diagnosed in over 100 Africa-region Peace Corps Volunteers annually. This suggests that prophylaxis non-adherence is a problem in these non-immune travelers.

Methods: We investigated Volunteers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding prophylaxis using an internet-based survey during August 19-September 30, 2013. Adherence was defined as taking doxycycline or atovaquone-proguanil daily, or taking mefloquine doses no more than 8 days apart.

Results: The survey was sent to 3248 Volunteers. Of 781 whose responses were analyzed, 514 (73%) reported adherence to prophylaxis. The most common reasons for non-adherence were forgetting (n = 530, 90%); fear of long-term adverse effects (LTAEs; n = 316, 54%); and experiencing adverse events that Volunteers attributed to prophylaxis (n = 297, 51%). Two hundred fourteen (27%) Volunteers reported not worrying about malaria. On multivariate analysis controlling for sex and experiencing adverse events Volunteers attributed to prophylaxis, the factor most strongly associated with non-adherence was being prescribed mefloquine (OR 5.4, 95% confidence interval 3.2-9.0).

Conclusions: We found moderate adherence and a prevailing fear of LTAEs among Volunteers. Strategies to improve prophylaxis adherence may include medication reminders, increasing education about prophylaxis safety and malaria risk, and promoting prompt management of prophylaxis side effects.

Keywords: Malaria chemoprophylaxis; Malaria in long-term travelers; Malaria prevention.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel