Inhomogeneous Distribution of Regional Myocardial Work Efficiency Predicts Early Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Intervention

Wei Wang, Hang Zhao, Fang Wan, Xue-Dong Shen, Song Ding, Jun Pu, Wei Wang, Hang Zhao, Fang Wan, Xue-Dong Shen, Song Ding, Jun Pu

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the hypothesis that specific pattern of myocardial work (MW) distribution in patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) could provide prognostic value for predicting left ventricular (LV) remodeling.

Methods: A total of 98 first anterior wall STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention [85 men (86.7%), mean age: 58 ± 12 years] were enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed 24-72 h after angioplasty and during 3-month follow-up. MW was estimated from the left ventricular pressure-strain loop derived from speckle tracking echocardiography and simultaneous noninvasive brachial artery cuff pressure. The primary endpoint was early LV remodeling, defined as an increase in LV end-diastolic volume ≥20% compared with baseline at 3 months after STEMI. Major adverse cardiac events and combined clinical outcomes were recorded.

Results: LV remodeling was present in 32 patients (33%), who exhibited lower global and culprit-regional work index (WI), constructive work (CW), work efficiency (WE), and specifically, greater differences of WE (delta-WE) and CW (delta-CW) between the culprit and non-culprit region than those without LV remodeling both at the acute phase and follow-up (all P < 0.0125). During follow-up, all global and regional WI, CW, and WE were improved (P < 0.0125 compared with baseline), with less improvement in patients with LV remodeling. In multivariate analysis, baseline delta-WE (odds ratio: 2.304; 95% CI: 1.093-4.856, P = 0.028) and peak troponin I level (odds ratio: 1.035; 95%CI: 1.008-1.063, P = 0.010) were independently associated with early LV remodeling. Patients with greater delta-WE at baseline were associated with a higher incidence of heart failure and combined clinical outcomes during follow-up.

Conclusion: After reperfused acute anterior STEMI, patients with LV remodeling presented with more inhomogeneous MW distribution. The absolute difference of WE between culprit and non-culprit territory at the acute phase is an independent predictor for early LV remodeling.

Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05107102.

Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; echocardiography; left ventricular remodeling; myocardial work; work efficiency.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Zhao, Wan, Shen, Ding and Pu.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The18-segment model for myocardial work analysis. Red dots indicate the segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory, while yellow dots indicate the non-LAD territory.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart for the selection of our study population.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative WE bull's-eye plots of patients without (A) and with (B) early left ventricular remodeling. Asterisks indicate segments assigned to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory. The no-remodeling patient showed relatively homogeneous regional WE (presented in green) between LAD and non-LAD territory. In contrast, the remodeling patient exhibited significantly reduced WE in LAD territory (presented in yellow and orange). The index of delta-WE (calculated as WENONLAD – WELAD) was much greater in the remodeling patient than the no-remodeling (28 vs. 11%), indicating a more inhomogeneous distribution of regional WE. LAD, left anterior descending artery coronary artery; LV, left ventricular; WE, work efficiency; WELAD, average of segmental WE in LAD territory; WENONLAD, average of segmental WE in non-LAD territory.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves of delta-WE to identify early LV remodeling in anterior STEMI patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparisons of receiver operating characteristic curves of baseline traditional clinical risk factors with and without delta-WE to predict early left ventricular remodeling in anterior STEMI patients. AUC, area under the curve.

References

    1. van der Bijl P, Abou R, Goedemans L, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR Jr, Ajmone Marsan N, et al. . Left ventricular post-infarct remodeling: implications for systolic function improvement and outcomes in the modern era. JACC Heart Fail. (2020) 8:131–40. 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.014
    1. Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. (2000) 101:2981–8. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2981
    1. Masci PG, Ganame J, Francone M, Desmet W, Lorenzoni V, Iacucci I, et al. . Relationship between location and size of myocardial infarction and their reciprocal influences on post-infarction left ventricular remodelling. Eur Heart J. (2011) 32:1640–8. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr064
    1. Bolognese L, Neskovic AN, Parodi G, Cerisano G, Buonamici P, Santoro GM, et al. . Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation. (2002) 106:2351–7. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000036014.90197.FA
    1. Bauters C, Dubois E, Porouchani S, Saloux E, Fertin M, de Groote P, et al. . Long-term prognostic impact of left ventricular remodeling after a first myocardial infarction in modern clinical practice. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0188884. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188884
    1. Burchfield JS, Xie M, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: mechanisms: part 1 of 2. Circulation. (2013) 128:388–400. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001878
    1. Cvijic M, Duchenne J, Ünlü S, Michalski B, Aarones M, Winter S, et al. . Timing of myocardial shortening determines left ventricular regional myocardial work and regional remodelling in hearts with conduction delays. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2018) 19:941–9. 10.1093/ehjci/jex325
    1. Duchenne J, Turco A, Ünlü S, Pagourelias ED, Vunckx K, Degtiarova G, et al. . Left ventricular remodeling results in homogenization of myocardial work distribution. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. (2019) 12:e007224. 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007224
    1. Bastos MB, Burkhoff D, Maly J, Daemen J, den Uil CA, Ameloot K, et al. . Invasive left ventricle pressure-volume analysis: overview and practical clinical implications. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:1286–97. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz552
    1. Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, Wilhelmsen N, Skulstad H, Remme EW, et al. . A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:724–33. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs016
    1. Manganaro R, Marchetta S, Dulgheru R, Sugimoto T, Tsugu T, Ilardi F, et al. . Correlation between non-invasive myocardial work indices and main parameters of systolic and diastolic function: results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2020) 21:533–41. 10.1093/ehjci/jez203
    1. Manganaro R, Marchetta S, Dulgheru R, Sugimoto T, Tsugu T, Ilardi F, et al. . Global myocardial work is superior to global longitudinal strain to predict significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular function and wall motion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2019) 32:947–57. 10.1016/j.echo.2019.02.014
    1. Meimoun P, Abdani S, Stracchi V, Elmkies F, Boulanger J, Botoro T, et al. . Usefulness of noninvasive myocardial work to predict left ventricular recovery and acute complications after acute anterior myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2020) 33:1180–90. 10.1016/j.echo.2020.07.008
    1. Lustosa RP, Fortuni F, van der Bijl P, Goedemans L, El Mahdiui M, Montero-Cabezas JM, et al. . Left ventricular myocardial work in the culprit vessel territory and impact on left ventricular remodelling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2021) 22:339–47. 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa175
    1. Lustosa RP, van der Bijl P, El Mahdiui M, Montero-Cabezas JM, Kostyukevich MV, Ajmone Marsan N, et al. . Noninvasive myocardial work indices 3 months after st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: prevalence and characteristics of patients with postinfarction cardiac remodeling. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2020) 33:1172–9. 10.1016/j.echo.2020.05.001
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. . Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2015) 28:1–39.e14. 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
    1. Meimoun P, Abouth S, Clerc J, Elmkies F, Martis S, Luycx-Bore A, et al. . Usefulness of two-dimensional longitudinal strain pattern to predict left ventricular recovery and in-hospital complications after acute anterior myocardial infarction treated successfully by primary angioplasty. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2015) 28:1366–75. 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.022
    1. Main ML, Hannen MN, Kusnetzky LL, Martin JL, Coggins TR, Lanza P, et al. . Myocardial contrast echocardiographic estimates of infarct size predict likelihood of left ventricular remodeling after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2006) 19:64–70. 10.1016/j.echo.2005.05.009
    1. Di Tano G, Caretta G, De Maria R, Parolini M, Bassi L, Testa S, et al. . Galectin-3 predicts left ventricular remodelling after anterior-wall myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. (2017) 103:71–7. 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309673
    1. Boe E, Russell K, Eek C, Eriksen M, Remme EW, Smiseth OA, et al. . Non-invasive myocardial work index identifies acute coronary occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 16:1247–55. 10.1093/ehjci/jev078
    1. Bogaert J, Bosmans H, Maes A, Suetens P, Marchal G, Rademakers FE. Remote myocardial dysfunction after acute anterior myocardial infarction: impact of left ventricular shape on regional function: a magnetic resonance myocardial tagging study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2000) 35:1525–34. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00601-X
    1. Hanratty CG, Koyama Y, Rasmussen HH, Nelson GI, Hansen PS, Ward MR. Exaggeration of nonculprit stenosis during acute myocardial infarction: implications for immediate multivessel revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2002) 40:911–6. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02049-1
    1. Zhang Y, Chan AK Yu CM, Lam WW, Yip GW, Fung WH, et al. . Left ventricular systolic asynchrony after acute myocardial infarction in patients with narrow QRS complexes. Am Heart J. (2005) 149:497–503. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.054
    1. Sörensen J, Harms HJ, Aalen JM, Baron T, Smiseth OA, Flachskampf FA. Myocardial efficiency: a fundamental physiological concept on the verge of clinical impact. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2020) 13:1564–76. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.08.030
    1. Lustosa RP, Butcher SC, van der Bijl P, El Mahdiui M, Montero-Cabezas JM, Kostyukevich MV, et al. . Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Efficiency and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2021) 14:e012072. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012072
    1. Honka H, Solis-Herrera C, Triplitt C, Norton L, Butler J, DeFronzo RA. Therapeutic manipulation of myocardial metabolism: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2021) 77:2022–39. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.057

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel