Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Identifies Cell-Cell Communication Associated with Tumor Characteristics

Manu P Kumar, Jinyan Du, Georgia Lagoudas, Yang Jiao, Andrew Sawyer, Daryl C Drummond, Douglas A Lauffenburger, Andreas Raue, Manu P Kumar, Jinyan Du, Georgia Lagoudas, Yang Jiao, Andrew Sawyer, Daryl C Drummond, Douglas A Lauffenburger, Andreas Raue

Abstract

Tumor ecosystems are composed of multiple cell types that communicate by ligand-receptor interactions. Targeting ligand-receptor interactions (for instance, with immune checkpoint inhibitors) can provide significant benefits for patients. However, our knowledge of which interactions occur in a tumor and how these interactions affect outcome is still limited. We present an approach to characterize communication by ligand-receptor interactions across all cell types in a microenvironment using single-cell RNA sequencing. We apply this approach to identify and compare the ligand-receptor interactions present in six syngeneic mouse tumor models. To identify interactions potentially associated with outcome, we regress interactions against phenotypic measurements of tumor growth rate. In addition, we quantify ligand-receptor interactions between T cell subsets and their relation to immune infiltration using a publicly available human melanoma dataset. Overall, this approach provides a tool for studying cell-cell interactions, their variability across tumors, and their relationship to outcome.

Keywords: cancer patient samples; cell-cell communication; computational analysis; ligand-receptor interaction; single-cell RNA sequencing; syngeneic mouse models; tumor microenvironment.

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

Several co-authors are employed by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.. T-SNE Visualization of Single-Cell Sequencing…
Figure 1.. T-SNE Visualization of Single-Cell Sequencing Data and Cell Type Classification
(A) The percentage of cells positive for a variety of immune cell markers as measured by either scRNA-seq (x axis) or flow cytometry (y axis) is consistent across tumor models.(B and C) t-distributed scholastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plots of cells from six syngeneic tumor models show distinct clusters predominantly determined by cell type.(B) Cells are colored by the tumor model from which the cell originated.(C) Cells are colored by the cell type label assigned at the end of the classification procedure.(D) Percentages of cell types vary across the different tumor models. To reflect the actual cell type abundances, only data from samples not enriched for CD45 are shown. See also Figures S1 and S2.
Figure 2.. Quantification of Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring…
Figure 2.. Quantification of Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in the Tumor Microenvironment
Heatmaps show selected interaction scores calculated as the product of the average ligand expression of the first cell type and average receptor expression of the second cell type. Cell type labels are written as (cell type expressing the ligand) ‒ (cell type expressing the receptor). Black dots indicate interactions that are significantly present across all tumor (one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Benjamini Hochberg false discovery rate [FDR]

Figure 3.. Interaction Scores Correlate with Relevant…

Figure 3.. Interaction Scores Correlate with Relevant Characteristics of the Tumor Microenvironment

(A) Tumor volume…

Figure 3.. Interaction Scores Correlate with Relevant Characteristics of the Tumor Microenvironment
(A) Tumor volume (y axis) of treatment-naive mice measured over time (x axis) (Table S4). Dashed lines indicate the mean of a syngeneic tumor model, and shaded areas represent 1 SEM (n = 8 for Sa1N, 7 for LL2, 10 for CT26, 9 for EMT6, and 9 for MC38). Instances with no shading result from only one mouse surviving at the measured time points. Linear curves were fit to the log-normalized growth curves, and the slope of fit curves was used as a metric for tumor growth. (B) Quantified growth rates for each model. Each point represents a single mouse, and the horizontal black line indicates the median growth rate used for correlation with interaction scores.(C) Heatmap showing the Spearman correlation of interaction scores (shown in Figure 2) with tumor growth. Interactions marked with black circles indicate correlations with p

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in…

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in Human Metastatic Melanoma

(A) Cell-cell interactions involving Tregs…

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in Human Metastatic Melanoma
(A) Cell-cell interactions involving Tregs in human metastatic melanoma averaged across 19 tumor samples. The cell type labels are written as (cell type expressing the ligand) ‒ (cell type expressing the receptor). Black dots indicate interactions that are significantly present across all tumors (one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Benjamini Hochberg FDR
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Biswas SK, and Mantovani A (2010). Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat. Immunol 11, 889–896. - PubMed
    1. Bittner S, Knoll G, and Ehrenschwender M (2017). Death receptor 3 signaling enhances proliferation of human regulatory T cells. FEBS Lett 591, 1187–1195. - PubMed
    1. Blake JA, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Smith CL, and Bult CJ; the Mouse Genome Database Group (2017). Mouse Genome Database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 45 (D1), D723–D729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenmiller B (2016). Multiplexed Epitope-Based Tissue Imaging for Discovery and Healthcare Applications. Cell Syst 2, 225–238. - PubMed
    1. Camp JG, Sekine K, Gerber T, Loeffler-Wirth H, Binder H, Gac M, Kanton S, Kageyama J, Damm G, Seehofer D, et al. (2017). Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development from pluripotency. Nature 546, 533–538. - PubMed
Show all 39 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure 3.. Interaction Scores Correlate with Relevant…
Figure 3.. Interaction Scores Correlate with Relevant Characteristics of the Tumor Microenvironment
(A) Tumor volume (y axis) of treatment-naive mice measured over time (x axis) (Table S4). Dashed lines indicate the mean of a syngeneic tumor model, and shaded areas represent 1 SEM (n = 8 for Sa1N, 7 for LL2, 10 for CT26, 9 for EMT6, and 9 for MC38). Instances with no shading result from only one mouse surviving at the measured time points. Linear curves were fit to the log-normalized growth curves, and the slope of fit curves was used as a metric for tumor growth. (B) Quantified growth rates for each model. Each point represents a single mouse, and the horizontal black line indicates the median growth rate used for correlation with interaction scores.(C) Heatmap showing the Spearman correlation of interaction scores (shown in Figure 2) with tumor growth. Interactions marked with black circles indicate correlations with p

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in…

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in Human Metastatic Melanoma

(A) Cell-cell interactions involving Tregs…

Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in Human Metastatic Melanoma
(A) Cell-cell interactions involving Tregs in human metastatic melanoma averaged across 19 tumor samples. The cell type labels are written as (cell type expressing the ligand) ‒ (cell type expressing the receptor). Black dots indicate interactions that are significantly present across all tumors (one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Benjamini Hochberg FDR
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Biswas SK, and Mantovani A (2010). Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat. Immunol 11, 889–896. - PubMed
    1. Bittner S, Knoll G, and Ehrenschwender M (2017). Death receptor 3 signaling enhances proliferation of human regulatory T cells. FEBS Lett 591, 1187–1195. - PubMed
    1. Blake JA, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Smith CL, and Bult CJ; the Mouse Genome Database Group (2017). Mouse Genome Database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 45 (D1), D723–D729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenmiller B (2016). Multiplexed Epitope-Based Tissue Imaging for Discovery and Healthcare Applications. Cell Syst 2, 225–238. - PubMed
    1. Camp JG, Sekine K, Gerber T, Loeffler-Wirth H, Binder H, Gac M, Kanton S, Kageyama J, Damm G, Seehofer D, et al. (2017). Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development from pluripotency. Nature 546, 533–538. - PubMed
Show all 39 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in…
Figure 4.. Assessing Cell-Cell Interactions Occurring in Human Metastatic Melanoma
(A) Cell-cell interactions involving Tregs in human metastatic melanoma averaged across 19 tumor samples. The cell type labels are written as (cell type expressing the ligand) ‒ (cell type expressing the receptor). Black dots indicate interactions that are significantly present across all tumors (one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Benjamini Hochberg FDR

References

    1. Biswas SK, and Mantovani A (2010). Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat. Immunol 11, 889–896.
    1. Bittner S, Knoll G, and Ehrenschwender M (2017). Death receptor 3 signaling enhances proliferation of human regulatory T cells. FEBS Lett 591, 1187–1195.
    1. Blake JA, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Smith CL, and Bult CJ; the Mouse Genome Database Group (2017). Mouse Genome Database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 45 (D1), D723–D729.
    1. Bodenmiller B (2016). Multiplexed Epitope-Based Tissue Imaging for Discovery and Healthcare Applications. Cell Syst 2, 225–238.
    1. Camp JG, Sekine K, Gerber T, Loeffler-Wirth H, Binder H, Gac M, Kanton S, Kageyama J, Damm G, Seehofer D, et al. (2017). Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development from pluripotency. Nature 546, 533–538.
    1. Choi H, Sheng J, Gao D, Li F, Durrans A, Ryu S, Lee SB, Narula N, Rafii S, Elemento O, et al. (2015). Transcriptome analysis of individual stromal cell populations identifies stroma-tumor crosstalk in mouse lung cancer model. Cell Rep 10, 1187–1201.
    1. Costa A, Kieffer Y, Scholer-Dahirel A, Pelon F, Bourachot B, Cardon M, Sirven P, Magagna I, Fuhrmann L, Bernard C, et al. (2018). Fibroblast Heterogeneity and Immunosuppressive Environment in Human Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 463–479.e10.
    1. Dempke WCM, Fenchel K, Uciechowski P, and Dale SP (2017). Second- and third-generation drugs for immuno-oncology treatment-The more the better? Eur. J. Cancer 74, 55–72.
    1. Eisenberg E, and Levanon EY (2013). Human housekeeping genes, revisited. Trends Genet 29, 569–574.
    1. Garcia-Alonso L, Iorio F, Matchan A, Fonseca N, Jaaks P, Falcone F, et al. (2017). Transcription factor activities enhance markers of drug response in cancer. Cancer Res, Published online December 11, 2017 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1679.
    1. Halama N, Zoernig I, Berthel A, Kahlert C, Klupp F, Suarez-Carmona M, Suetterlin T, Brand K, Krauss J, Lasitschka F, et al. (2016). Tumoral Immune Cell Exploitation in Colorectal Cancer Metastases Can Be Targeted Effectively by Anti-CCR5 Therapy in Cancer Patients. Cancer Cell 29, 587–601.
    1. Hanahan D, and Weinberg RA (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674.
    1. Ino Y, Yamazaki-Itoh R, Shimada K, Iwasaki M, Kosuge T, Kanai Y, and Hiraoka N (2013). Immune cell infiltration as an indicator of the immune micro-environment of pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Cancer 108, 914–923.
    1. Jiménez-Sánchez A, Memon D, Pourpe S, Veeraraghavan H, Li Y, Vargas HA, Gill MB, Park KJ, Zivanovic O, Konner J, et al. (2017). Heterogeneous Tumor-Immune Microenvironments among Differentially Growing Metastases in an Ovarian Cancer Patient. Cell 170, 927–938.e20.
    1. Kolodziejczyk AA, Kim JK, Svensson V, Marioni JC, and Teichmann SA (2015). The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol. Cell 58, 610–620.
    1. Lavin Y, Kobayashi S, Leader A, Amir ED, Elefant N, Bigenwald C, Remark R, Sweeney R, Becker CD, Levine JH, et al. (2017). Innate Immune Landscape in Early Lung Adenocarcinoma by Paired Single-Cell Analyses. Cell 169, 750–765.e17.
    1. Lin JR, Fallahi-Sichani M, and Sorger PK (2015). Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method. Nat. Commun 6, 8390.
    1. McGranahan N, and Swanton C (2017). Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future. Cell 168, 613–628.
    1. Pardoll DM (2012). The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immuno-therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 252–264.
    1. Pickup MW, Mouw JK, and Weaver VM (2014). The extracellular matrix modulates the hallmarks of cancer. EMBO Rep 15, 1243–1253.
    1. Puram SV, Tirosh I, Parikh AS, Patel AP, Yizhak K, Gillespie S, Rodman C, Luo CL, Mroz EA, Emerick KS, et al. (2017). Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Primary and Metastatic Tumor Ecosystems in Head and Neck Cancer. Cell 171, 1611–1624.e24.
    1. Qin L, Zhou Y-C, Wu H-J, Zhuo Y, Wang Y-P, Si C-Y, and Qin Y-M (2017). Notch Signaling Modulates the Balance of Regulatory T Cells and T Helper 17 Cells in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C. DNA Cell Biol 36, 311–320.
    1. Ramilowski JA, Goldberg T, Harshbarger J, Kloppmann E, Lizio M, Satagopam VP, Itoh M, Kawaji H, Carninci P, Rost B, and Forrest AR (2015). A draft network of ligand-receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat. Commun 6, 7866.
    1. Sanmamed MF, Chester C, Melero I, and Kohrt H (2016). Defining the optimal murine models to investigate immune checkpoint blockers and their combination with other immunotherapies. Ann. Oncol 27, 1190–1198.
    1. Sarkar S, Sabhachandani P, Stroopinsky D, Palmer K, Cohen N, Rose-nblatt J, Avigan D, and Konry T (2016). Dynamic analysis of immune and cancer cell interactions at single cell level in microfluidic droplets. Biomicrofluidics 10, 054115.
    1. Schapiro D, Jackson HW, Raghuraman S, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Schulz D, Giesen C, Catena R, Varga Z, and Bodenmiller B (2017). histoCAT: analysis of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex image cytometry data. Nat. Methods 14, 873–876.
    1. Schelker M, Feau S, Du J, Ranu N, Klipp E, MacBeath G, Schoeberl B, and Raue A (2017). Estimation of immune cell content in tumour tissue using single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Commun 8, 2032.
    1. Schreiber TH, Wolf D, Tsai MS, Chirinos J, Deyev VV, Gonzalez L, Malek TR, Levy RB, and Podack ER (2010). Therapeutic Treg expansion in mice by TNFRSF25 prevents allergic lung inflammation. J. Clin. Invest 120, 3629–3640.
    1. Schubert M, Klinger B, Klünemann M, Sieber A, Uhlitz F, Sauer S, Garnett MJ, Blüthgen N, and Saez-Rodriguez J (2018). Perturbation-response genes reveal signaling footprints in cancer gene expression. Nat. Commun 9, 20.
    1. Schumacher TN, Kesmir C, and van Buuren MM (2015). Biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 27, 12–14.
    1. Shang B, Liu Y, Jiang SJ, and Liu Y (2015). Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep 5, 15179.
    1. Skelly DA, Squiers GT, McLellan MA, Bolisetty MT, Robson P, Rosenthal NA, and Pinto AR (2018). Single-Cell Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Cellular Diversity and Intercommunication in the Mouse Heart. Cell Rep 22, 600–610.
    1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SPH, Buneman OP, Davenport AP, McGrath JC, Peters JA, et al.; NC-IUPHAR (2016). The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucleic Acids Res 44 (D1), D1054–D1068.
    1. Struhl G, and Greenwald I (1999). Presenilin is required for activity and nuclear access of Notch in Drosophila. Nature 398, 522–525.
    1. Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Treacy D, Trombetta JJ, Rotem A, Rodman C, Lian C, Murphy G, et al. (2016). Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189–196.
    1. Van Der Maaten LJP, and Hinton GE (2008). Visualizing high-dimensional data using t-sne. J. Mach. Learn. Res 9, 2579–2605.
    1. Venning FA, Wullkopf L, and Erler JT (2015). Targeting ECM Disrupts Cancer Progression. Front. Oncol 5, 224.
    1. Zheng C, Zheng L, Yoo JK, Guo H, Zhang Y, Guo X, Kang B, Hu R, Huang JY, Zhang Q, et al. (2017). Landscape of Infiltrating T Cells in Liver Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell Sequencing. Cell 169, 1342–1356.e16.
    1. Zhou JX, Taramelli R, Pedrini E, Knijnenburg T, and Huang S (2017). Extracting Intercellular Signaling Network of Cancer Tissues using Ligand-Receptor Expression Patterns from Whole-tumor and Single-cell Transcriptomes. Sci. Rep 7, 8815.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel