Internet-based health education in China: a content analysis of websites

Ying Peng, Xi Wu, Salla Atkins, Merrick Zwarentein, Ming Zhu, Xing Xin Zhan, Fan Zhang, Peng Ran, Wei Rong Yan, Ying Peng, Xi Wu, Salla Atkins, Merrick Zwarentein, Ming Zhu, Xing Xin Zhan, Fan Zhang, Peng Ran, Wei Rong Yan

Abstract

Background: The Internet is increasingly being applied in health education worldwide; however there is little knowledge of its use in Chinese higher education institutions. The present study provides the first review and highlights the deficiencies and required future advances in Chinese Internet-based health education.

Methods: Two authors independently conducted a duplicate Internet search in order to identify information regarding Internet-based health education in China.

Results: The findings showed that Internet-based education began in China in September 1998. Currently, only 16 of 150 (10.7%) health education institutions in China offer fee-based online undergraduate degree courses, awarding associates and/or bachelors degrees. Fifteen of the 16 institutions were located in the middle or on the eastern coast of China, where were more developed than other regions. Nursing was the most popular discipline in Internet-based health education, while some other disciplines, such as preventive medicine, were only offered at one university. Besides degree education, Chinese institutions also offered non-degree online training and free resources. The content was mainly presented in the form of PowerPoint slides or videos for self-learning. Very little online interactive mentoring was offered with any of the courses.

Conclusions: There is considerable potential for the further development of Internet-based health education in China. These developments should include a focus on strengthening cooperation among higher education institutions in order to develop balanced online health curricula, and on enhancing distance education in low- and middle-income regions to meet extensive learning demands.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Locations (indicated with ‘★’) of the 16 institutions offering health-related disciplines via Internet-based degree education in China.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of Chinese institutions for each health related discipline recently offered through Internet-based degree education. Legend text:1 = Nursing; 2 = Pharmacy; 3 = Applied psychology; 4 = Medicine and health management; 5 = Herbology; 6 = Acupuncture and moxibustion; 7 = Medical laboratory technology; 8 = Clinical engineering technology; 9 = Biomedical engineering; 10 = Labor and social security; 11 = Social work (family planning); 12 = Basic medicine; 13 = Preventive medicine; 14 = Food hygiene inspection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The trend of student enrollments in Internet-based health education from 2002 to 2010 in China.

References

    1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2006: working together for health. [ ]
    1. Rao KQ, Chen YD. Healthcare resources allocation criteria budget research in different regions in China. China Health Econ. 1997;11:1–4.
    1. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–212. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.
    1. Sharma K, George S, Zodpey S. Understanding the current status and exploring the potential for distance education in public health in India. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(1):7–13. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.82533.
    1. Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA. e-learning: a review of internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:20–30. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340240105.
    1. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-Based Learning in the Health Professions: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–1196. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181.
    1. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-12.
    1. Kim KJ, Han J, Park IB, Kee C. Medical education in Korea: the e-learning consortium. Med Teach. 2009;31:e397–e401.
    1. Choules AP. The use of elearning in medical education: a review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(978):212–216. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.054189.
    1. Sai D, Han X. The present situation and prospect of distance education in China. Distance Education in China. 2002;10:1–4.
    1. Wei H. On the present situation and countermeasure of university online education in China [dissertation] Dalian Province: Dalian University of Technology; 2005.
    1. Building capacity for research on social determinants of health in Asia. [ ]
    1. Harvard, MIT partner to offer free online courses. [ ]
    1. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Open educational resources. .
    1. Vrasidas C, Mclsaac MS. Factors influencing interaction in an online course. Am J Dist Educ. 1999;13(3):22–36. doi: 10.1080/08923649909527033.
    1. Butterworth K, Hayes B, Zimmerman M. Remote and rural: do mentors enhance the value of distance learning continuing medical education? Educ Health. 2011;24(3):539.
    1. Bocchia J, Eastmanb JK, Swiftc CO. Retaining the online learner: profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. J Educ Bus. 2004;79(4):245–253. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.245-253.
    1. Leem J, Lim B. The current status of e-learning and strategies to enhance educational competitiveness in Korean higher education. Int Rev Res Open and Dis Learn. 2007;8(1):1–18.
    1. Seluakumaran K, Jusof FF, Ismail R, Husain R. Integrating an open-source course management system (Moodle) into the teaching of a first-year medical physiology course: a case study. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(4):369–377. doi: 10.1152/advan.00008.2011.
    1. Sleator RD. The evolution of eLearning background, blends and blackboard. Sci Prog. 2010;93(3):319–334. doi: 10.3184/003685010X12710124862922.
    1. Ren G. Analysis of the difference of education between China and the West. Educ Manage. 2007;9:1–4.
    1. An T. The impact of cultural and traditional difference on education technology. E-educ Res. 2007;2:1–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel