Analysis of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Zhengyi Yu, Jiawei Wang, Xiaomin Cai, Zhenzhen Gao, Sailan Wang, Yanhong Gu, Zhengyi Yu, Jiawei Wang, Xiaomin Cai, Zhenzhen Gao, Sailan Wang, Yanhong Gu

Abstract

Background: In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity profile of chemotherapy combinations containing pemetrexed for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We investigated the optimal chemotherapy treatment regimen to provide a new option for third-line or after treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 88 eligible patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in this study from April 2009 to March 2019 at the Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The baseline information and treatment outcomes of the patients were collected. Statistical analyses of different chemotherapy regimens focusing on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were conducted. The superior treatment regimen was determined, and its clinical outcomes were compared with those of the other treatment combinations to explore the factors that potentially contributed to the curative effect.

Results: The 88 patients in this study received 18 treatment regimens. In total, 53 patients had progressive disease (PD), 34 patients had stable disease (SD), 1 patient was assessed as complete response (CR), and no patients had a partial response (PR). The optimal regimen was pemetrexed + S-1 + bevacizumab. The 21 patients treated with this regimen exhibited a higher DCR [61.90% vs. 32.84%, odds ratio (OR) =3.324; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.201-9.196, P=0.018] than patients treated with the other chemotherapy regimens. Moreover, the median PFS of this regimen was 4.57 (2.62-6.51) months, which was significantly longer [hazard ratio (HR) =0.566; 95% CI: 0.330-0.971, P=0.039] than the 2.57 (2.18-2.95) months of the other regimens. In terms of toxicity, leukopenia (34.1%) and neutropenia (34.1%) had the highest incidence of all-grade adverse events (AEs). Grade 3-4 AEs included neutropenia (15.9%), leukopenia (11.4%), thrombocytopenia (2.3%), and anemia (1.1%).

Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed + S-1 + bevacizumab was found to be the optimal treatment regimen. This combination was superior to the other treatment regimens in terms of DCR and PFS with controllable toxicity. These results warrant further prospective exploratory clinical trials for pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Keywords: Metastatic colorectal cancer; advanced colorectal cancer; pemetrexed; third-line treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1095). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves depicting survival in patients with different treatment combinations. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival; (B) Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival. PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The changing rate of CEA during treatment of CEA-positive (>4.71 ng/mL) patients in the two groups. (A) All positive patients, (B) patients excluding progression within 2 months. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changing rate of target lesions of patients in the two groups. Changing rate was evaluated when the curative effect or progression appeared.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time distribution of treatment initiation in two groups. The time distribution of treatment initiation in the two groups differed, and the superior treatment group was closer overall.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Sun KX, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, et al. Report of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Different Areas of China. China Cancer 2019;28:1-11.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, Colon Cancer, Version 4.2018. Available online: , accessed October 19, 2018.
    1. Fukuoka S, Hara H, Takahashi N, et al. Regorafenib Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Colorectal Cancer: An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial (REGONIVO, EPOC1603). J Clin Oncol 2020;38:2053-61. 10.1200/JCO.19.03296
    1. Meric-Bernstam F, Hurwitz H, Raghav K, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (MyPathway): an updated report from a multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:518-30. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30904-5
    1. Hong DS, DuBois SG, Kummar S, et al. Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:531-40. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30856-3
    1. ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium) Injection. [cited 2018 Oct 10]. Available online:
    1. Rossi G, Alama A, Genova C, et al. The evolving role of pemetrexed disodium for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018;19:1969-76. 10.1080/14656566.2018.1536746
    1. Zhang G, Xie X, Liu T, et al. Effects of pemetrexed, gefitinib, and their combination on human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2013;72:767-75. 10.1007/s00280-013-2251-5
    1. Underhill C, Goldstein D, Gorbounova VA, et al. A randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) versus leucovorin-modulated 5-FU plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology 2007;73:9-20. 10.1159/000120626
    1. Wu XY, Huang XE, You SX, et al. Phase II study of pemetrexed as second or third line combined chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:2019-22. 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.3.2019
    1. Passardi A, Fanini F, Turci L, et al. Prolonged Pemetrexed Infusion Plus Gemcitabine in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Preclinical Rationale and Phase II Study Results. Oncologist 2017;22:886-e79. 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0206
    1. Lim SW, Lee S, Lee J, et al. Pemetrexed Monotherapy as Salvage Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy: A Phase II Single-arm Prospective Trial. J Cancer 2018;9:2910-5. 10.7150/jca.24948
    1. Zhang W, Cui CX, Liu JB, et al. Evaluation of pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. Chinese General Practice 2015:2042-5.
    1. Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:619-29. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70156-7
    1. Li J, Qin S, Xu RH, et al. Effect of Fruquintinib vs Placebo on Overall Survival in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The FRESCO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018;319:2486-96. 10.1001/jama.2018.7855
    1. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2335-42. 10.1056/NEJMoa032691
    1. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;317:2392-401. 10.1001/jama.2017.7105
    1. Woods B, Paracha N, Scott DA, et al. Raltitrexed plus cisplatin is cost-effective compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2012;75:261-7. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.07.011
    1. Peng RJ, Dong QM, Shi YX, et al. Correlative Analysis between Serum Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity, Concentration of 5-Fluorouracil and Adverse Events in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients. Ai Zheng. 2006;25:1039-43.
    1. Usuki H, Ishimura K, Yachida S, et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in gastric cancer tissue and effect of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines. Gastric Cancer 2003;6 Suppl 1:66-70. 10.1007/s10120-003-0225-8
    1. Yasui H, Muro K, Shimada Y, et al. A phase 3 non-inferiority study of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results of the FIRIS study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015;141:153-60. 10.1007/s00432-014-1783-3
    1. Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Yoshida N, et al. Efficacy of S-1 in colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014;15:1761-70. 10.1517/14656566.2014.937706
    1. Hsu HC, Chou WC, Kuan FC, et al. A Phase II study of S-1 plus oral leucovorin in heavily treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:6061-70. 10.2147/CMAR.S179345
    1. Liu DL, Wang YH, Lu S, et al. Clinical observation of Tiggio in third-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. The Practical Journal of Cancer 2016;31:1564-5.
    1. Dai YD, Zhang DX, Tan Y, et al. Clinical observation of irinotecan combined with tiggio second- and third-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Journal of Practical Oncology 2014;29:186-91.
    1. Bu LJ, Wu J, Da J, et al. Clinical Observation of Tiggio Capsules in the Treatment of Elderly Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Anhui Medical Journal 2012;33:416-8.
    1. Benson AB. S-1: another oral agent for patients with colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:1244-5. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70533-3
    1. Guan ZZ, Xu JM, Luo RC, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial. Chin J Cancer 2011;30:682-9. 10.5732/cjc.011.10188
    1. Iwamoto S, Takahashi T, Tamagawa H, et al. FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based therapy: the randomized phase III EAGLE study. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1427-33. 10.1093/annonc/mdv197
    1. Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M, et al. PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2240-7. 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473
    1. Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147):a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:29-37. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70477-1
    1. Masi G, Salvatore L, Boni L, et al. Continuation or reintroduction of bevacizumab beyond progression to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of the randomized BEBYP trial. Ann Oncol 2015;26:724-30. 10.1093/annonc/mdv012

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel