Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine in Chinese women aged 18-25 years: End-of-study results from a phase II/III, randomised, controlled trial

Feng-Cai Zhu, Shang-Ying Hu, Ying Hong, Yue-Mei Hu, Xun Zhang, Yi-Ju Zhang, Qin-Jing Pan, Wen-Hua Zhang, Fang-Hui Zhao, Cheng-Fu Zhang, Xiaoping Yang, Jia-Xi Yu, Jiahong Zhu, Yejiang Zhu, Feng Chen, Qian Zhang, Hong Wang, Changrong Wang, Jun Bi, Shiyin Xue, Lingling Shen, Yan-Shu Zhang, Yunkun He, Haiwen Tang, Naveen Karkada, Pemmaraju Suryakiran, Dan Bi, Frank Struyf, Feng-Cai Zhu, Shang-Ying Hu, Ying Hong, Yue-Mei Hu, Xun Zhang, Yi-Ju Zhang, Qin-Jing Pan, Wen-Hua Zhang, Fang-Hui Zhao, Cheng-Fu Zhang, Xiaoping Yang, Jia-Xi Yu, Jiahong Zhu, Yejiang Zhu, Feng Chen, Qian Zhang, Hong Wang, Changrong Wang, Jun Bi, Shiyin Xue, Lingling Shen, Yan-Shu Zhang, Yunkun He, Haiwen Tang, Naveen Karkada, Pemmaraju Suryakiran, Dan Bi, Frank Struyf

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in China. We report the end-of-study results of a phase II/III trial to assess the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the AS04-human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 vaccine in Chinese women aged 18-25 years followed for up to 72 months after first vaccination. Results of approximately 57 months following first vaccination have been previously reported.

Methods: Healthy 18-25-year-old women (N = 6051) were randomized (1:1) to receive three doses of AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine or Al(OH)3 (control) at Months 0-1-6. Vaccine efficacy against HPV-16/18 infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), cross-protective vaccine efficacy against infections and lesions associated with nonvaccine oncogenic HPV types, immunogenicity, and safety were assessed. Efficacy was assessed in the according-to-protocol efficacy (ATP-E) cohort (vaccine N = 2888; control N = 2892), total vaccinated cohort for efficacy (TVC-E; vaccine N = 2987; control N = 2985) and TVC-naïve (vaccine N = 1660; control N = 1587).

Results: In initially HPV-16/18 seronegative/DNA-negative women, vaccine efficacy against HPV-16/18-associated CIN grade 2 or worse was 87.3% (95% CI: 5.5, 99.7) in the ATP-E, 88.7% (95% CI: 18.5, 99.7) in the TVC-E, and 100% (95% CI: 17.9, 100) in the TVC-naïve. Cross-protective efficacy against incident infection with HPV-31, HPV-33 and HPV-45 was 59.6% (95% CI: 39.4, 73.5), 42.7% (95% CI: 15.6, 61.6), and 54.8% (95% CI: 19.3, 75.6), respectively (ATP-E). At Month 72, >95% of initially seronegative women who received HPV vaccine in the ATP cohort for immunogenicity (N = 664) remained seropositive for anti-HPV-16/18 antibodies; anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 geometric mean titers were 678.1 EU/mL (95% CI: 552.9, 831.5) and 343.7 EU/mL (95% CI: 291.9, 404.8), respectively. Serious adverse events were infrequent (1.9% vaccine group [N = 3026]; 2.7% control group [N = 3025]). Three and zero women died in the control group and the vaccine group respectively. New onset autoimmune disease was reported in two women in the vaccine group and two in the control group.

Conclusions: This is the first large-scale randomized clinical trial of HPV vaccination in China. High and sustained vaccine efficacy against HPV-16/18-associated infection and cervical lesions was demonstrated up to Month 72. The vaccine had an acceptable safety profile. Combined with screening, prophylactic HPV vaccination could potentially reduce the high burden of HPV infection and cervical cancer in China.

Trial registration: NCT00779766.

Keywords: AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine; China; efficacy; human papillomavirus; immunogenicity; safety.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare the following potential conflicts of interest: The institutions of Fang‐Hui Zhao, Shang‐Ying Hu, Ying Hong, Yue‐Mei Hu, Xun Zhang, Yi‐Ju Zhang, Qin‐Jing Pan, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Cheng‐Fu Zhang, Xiaoping Yang, Jia‐Xi Yu, Jiahong Zhu, Yejiang Zhu, Feng Chen, Qian Zhang, Hong Wang, Changrong Wang, Jun Bi, Shiyin Xue, Lingling Shen, Yan‐Shu Zhang, Feng‐Cai Zhu received grants/investigator fees from the GSK group of companies for the conduct of this study. Fang‐Hui Zhao, Feng‐Cai Zhu and Yue‐Mei Hu received support for travel to meetings related to the study from the GSK group of companies. Haiwen Tang, Naveen Karkada, Dan Bi and Frank Struyf are employees of the GSK group of companies. Haiwen Tang, Dan Bi, and Frank Struyf hold shares in the GSK group of companies. Pemmaraju Suryakiran and Yunkun He were employees of the GSK group of companies at the time the study was conducted.

© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant disposition. The TVC‐naïve included 1660 women in the vaccine group and 1587 women in the control group. AE, adverse event; ATP‐E, according to protocol cohort for efficacy; N, number of women in the analysis; n, number of cases; SAE, serious adverse event; TVC‐E, total vaccinated cohort for efficacy; TVC‐naïve, total vaccinated naïve cohort; TVC, total vaccinated cohort
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical diagnosis and biopsy PCR results of CIN2+ cases associated with HPV‐16/18 (TVC‐E). Cases were from women in the TVC‐E who were HPV‐16/18 DNA‐negative at baseline regardless of initial serostatus. ‖Case 1 was also part of the ATP‐E cohort. *All samples taken by punch biopsy except case 9 which was taken by endocervical curettage. CIN1, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1; CIN2, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2; CIN3, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3; HPV, human papillomavirus; LSIL, low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TVC‐E, total vaccinated cohort for efficacy
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of cases of CIN2+ and CIN3+ associated with vaccine and nonvaccine types (TVC‐naïve). The incidence rate of CIN2+ irrespective of HPV was 0.13 per 100 person‐years in the vaccine group and 0.20 per 100 person‐years in the control group. The incidence rate of CIN3+ irrespective of HPV was 0.02 per 100 person‐years in the vaccine group and 0.05 per 100 person‐years in the control group. Oncogenic HPV types detected in CIN2+ cases in the vaccine group: no HPV detected (n = 2); HPV‐33 (n = 2); HPV‐35 (n = 1); HPV‐39 (n = 2); HPV‐51 (n = 1); HPV‐52/58 (n = 1); HPV‐58 (n = 1); HPV‐58/66 (n = 1). Oncogenic HPV types detected in CIN2+ cases in the control group: HPV‐16 (n = 4); HPV‐16/31/39 (n = 1); HPV‐16/66 (n = 1); HPV‐33 (n = 3); HPV‐35 (n = 1); HPV‐35/52 (n = 1); HPV‐45 (n = 1); HPV‐52 (n = 1); HPV‐58 (n = 3). Oncogenic HPV types detected in CIN3+ cases in the vaccine group: HPV‐58 (n = 1); HPV‐39 (n = 1). Oncogenic HPV types detected in CIN3+ cases in the control group: HPV‐16 (n = 2); HPV‐16/31/39 (n = 1); HPV‐58 (n = 1) CIN2+: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. CIN3+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse; HPV, human papillomavirus; TVC‐naïve, total vaccinated naïve cohort
Figure 4
Figure 4
Immunogenicity in initially seronegative women receiving the HPV‐16/18 vaccine (ATP cohort for immunogenicity). Numbers above bars show the percentage seropositivity. Solid line shows the level of antibodies observed following clearance of a natural infection ie GMTs observed in women who were HPV‐16/18 DNA‐negative and seropositive at baseline in a phase III efficacy study (29.8 EL.U/mL for HPV‐16 and 22.6 EL.U/mL for HPV‐18).34 ATP, according to protocol; CI, confidence interval; EL.U, ELISA units; GMT, geometric mean titer; HPV, human papillomavirus; M, month; Pre, prevaccination
Figure 5
Figure 5
Study highlights

References

    1. Walboomers J, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12‐19.
    1. Koshiol J, Lindsay L, Pimenta JM, Poole C, Jenkins D, Smith JS. Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(2):123‐137.
    1. Cogliano V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, Ghissassi FE. Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(4):204.
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115‐132.
    1. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer . China. Human papillomavirus and related cancers, fact sheet 2016. . Accessed September 2016.
    1. Zhao F‐H, Lewkowitz AK, Hu S‐Y, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in China: a pooled analysis of 17 population‐based studies. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(12):2929‐2938.
    1. Wang R, Guo X‐L, Wisman G, et al. Nationwide prevalence of human papillomavirus infection and viral genotype distribution in 37 cities in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:257.
    1. Zhao F‐H, Tiggelaar SM, Hu S‐Y, et al. A multi‐center survey of age of sexual debut and sexual behavior in Chinese women: suggestions for optimal age of human papillomavirus vaccination in China. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(4):384‐390.
    1. Mesher D, Soldan K, Howell‐Jones R, et al. Reduction in HPV 16/18 prevalence in sexually active young women following the introduction of HPV immunisation in England. Vaccine. 2013;32(1):26‐32.
    1. Kavanagh K, Pollock K, Potts A, et al. Introduction and sustained high coverage of the HPV bivalent vaccine leads to a reduction in prevalence of HPV 16/18 and closely related hpv types. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(11):2804‐2811.
    1. Pollock K, Kavanagh K, Potts A, et al. Reduction of low‐ and high‐grade cervical abnormalities associated with high uptake of the HPV bivalent vaccine in Scotland. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(9):1824‐1830.
    1. Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Wheeler CM, et al. Overall efficacy of HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4‐year end‐of‐study analysis of the randomised, double‐blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):89‐99.
    1. Romanowski B, de Borba PC, Naud PS, et al. Sustained efficacy and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine: analysis of a randomised placebo‐controlled trial up to 6.4 years. Lancet. 2009;374(9706):1975‐1985.
    1. Hildesheim A, Wacholder S, Catteau G, Struyf F, Dubin G, Herrero R. Efficacy of the HPV‐16/18 vaccine: final according to protocol results from the blinded phase of the randomized Costa Rica HPV‐16/18 vaccine trial. Vaccine. 2014;32(39):5087‐5097.
    1. Konno R, Yoshikawa H, Okutani M, et al. Efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical infection in young Japanese women: open follow‐up of a randomized clinical trial up to 4 years post‐vaccination. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2014;10(7):1781‐1794.
    1. Wheeler C, Skinner R, del Rosario‐Raymundo MR, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in women older than 25 years: 7‐year follow‐up of the phase 3, double‐blind, randomised controlled VIVIANE study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(10):1154‐1168.
    1. Arbyn M, Xu L, Simoens C, Martin‐Hirsch P. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018,5:CD009069 .
    1. Arbyn M, Xu L. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic HPV vaccines. A Cochrane review of randomized trials. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17(12):1085‐1091. 10.1080/14760584.2018.1548282.
    1. Wheeler CM, Castellsagué X, Garland SM, et al. Cross‐protective efficacy of HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by non‐vaccine oncogenic HPV types: 4‐year end‐of‐study analysis of the randomised, double‐blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):100‐110.
    1. Struyf F, Colau B, Wheeler CM, et al. Post hoc analysis of the PATRICIA randomized trial of the efficacy of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV‐16)/HPV‐18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine against incident and persistent infection with nonvaccine oncogenic HPV types using an alternative multiplex type‐specific PCR assay for HPV DNA. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015;22(2):235‐244.
    1. Herrero R, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, et al. Prevention of persistent human papillomavirus infection by an HPV16/18 vaccine: a community‐based randomized clinical trial in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(5):408‐419.
    1. Naud PS, Roteli‐Martins CM, De Carvalho NS, et al. Sustained efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine: final analysis of a long‐term follow‐up study up to 9.4 years post‐vaccination. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2014;10(8):2147‐2162.
    1. Angelo M‐G, David M‐P, Zima J, et al. Pooled analysis of large and long‐term safety data from the human papillomavirus‐16/18‐AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine clinical trial programme. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23(5):466‐479.
    1. Zhu FC, Chen W, Hu YM, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in healthy Chinese women aged 18–25 years: results from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2612‐2622.
    1. Zhu F‐C, Hu S‐Y, Hong Y, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in Chinese women aged 18–25 years: event‐triggered analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med. 2017;6(1):12‐25.
    1. Zhao FH, Zhu FC, Chen W, et al. Baseline prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in healthy Chinese women aged 18–25 years enrolled in a clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2604‐2611.
    1. van Doorn L‐J, Molijn A, Kleter B, Quint W, Colau B. Highly effective detection of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 DNA by a testing algorithm combining broad‐spectrum and type‐specific PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3292‐3298.
    1. Richart RM. A modified terminology for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(1):131‐133.
    1. Dessy FJ, Giannini SL, Bougelet CA, et al. Correlation between direct ELISA, single epitope‐based inhibition ELISA and pseudovirion‐based neutralization assay for measuring anti‐HPV‐16 and anti‐HPV‐18 antibody response after vaccination with the AS04‐adjuvanted HPV‐16/18 cervical cancer vaccine. Hum Vaccin. 2008;4(6):425‐434.
    1. Schwarz TF, Galaj A, Spaczynski M, et al. Ten‐year immune persistence and safety of the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in females vaccinated at 15–55 years of age. Cancer Med. 2017;6(11):2723‐2731.
    1. Szarewski A, Poppe WA, Skinner SR, et al. Efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in women aged 15–25 years with and without serological evidence of previous exposure to HPV‐16/18. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(1):106‐116.
    1. Paavonen J, Jenkins D, Bosch FX, et al. Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent l1 virus‐like‐particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double‐blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9580):2161‐2170.
    1. Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double‐blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):301‐314.
    1. de Sanjose S, Quint W, Alemany L, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross‐sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(11):1048‐1056.
    1. Wheeler CM, Hunt WC, Joste NE, Key CR, Quint W, Castle PE. Human papillomavirus genotype distributions: implications for vaccination and cancer screening in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(7):475‐487.
    1. Pirog EC, Lloveras B, Molijn A, et al. HPV prevalence and genotypes in different histological subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma, a worldwide analysis of 760 cases. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(12):1559‐1567.
    1. Chen W, Zhang X, Molijn A, et al. Human papillomavirus type‐distribution in cervical cancer in China: the importance of HPV 16 and 18. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(9):1705‐1713.
    1. Schwarz T, Spaczynski M, Kaufmann A, et al. Persistence of immune responses to the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in women aged 15–55 years and first‐time modelling of antibody responses in mature women: results from an open‐label 6‐year follow‐up study. BJOG. 2015;122(1):107‐118.
    1. Day PM, Kines RC, Thompson CD, et al. In vivo mechanisms of vaccine‐induced protection against HPV infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(3):260‐270.
    1. Schiller JT, Lowy DR. Understanding and learning from the success of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):681‐692.
    1. Stanley M, Lowy DR, Frazer I. Chapter 12: prophylactic HPV vaccines: underlying mechanisms. Vaccine, 2006;12:S106‐S113.
    1. Schwarz TF, Kocken M, Petäjä T, et al. Correlation between levels of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16 and 18 antibodies in serum and cervicovaginal secretions in girls and women vaccinated with the HPV‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine. Human Vaccin. 2010;6(12):1054‐1061.
    1. Dai LI, Zhu J, Liang J, Wang Y‐P, Wang HE, Mao M. Birth defects surveillance in China. World J Pediatr. 2011;7(4):302‐310.
    1. Yu M, Ping Z, Zhang S, He Y, Dong R, Guo X. The survey of birth defects rate based on birth registration system. Chinese Med J. 2015;128(1):7‐14.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel