Three-dimensionally printed navigational template: a promising guiding approach for lung biopsy

Haoran E, Jiafei Chen, Weiyan Sun, Yikai Zhang, Shengxiang Ren, Jingyun Shi, Yaofeng Wen, Chunxia Su, Jian Ni, Lei Zhang, Yayi He, Bin Chen, Roberto F Casal, Fayez Kheir, Tsukasa Ishiwata, Jie Zhang, Deping Zhao, Chang Chen, Haoran E, Jiafei Chen, Weiyan Sun, Yikai Zhang, Shengxiang Ren, Jingyun Shi, Yaofeng Wen, Chunxia Su, Jian Ni, Lei Zhang, Yayi He, Bin Chen, Roberto F Casal, Fayez Kheir, Tsukasa Ishiwata, Jie Zhang, Deping Zhao, Chang Chen

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy is customarily conducted under computed tomography (CT) guidance, which primarily depends on the conductors' experience and inevitably contributes to long procedural duration and radiation exposure. Novel technique facilitating lung biopsy is currently demanded.

Methods: Based on the reconstructed anatomical information of CT scans, a three-dimensionally printed navigational template was customized to guide fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The needle insertion site and angle could be indicated by the template after proper placement according to the reference landmarks. From June 2020 to August 2020, patients with peripheral indeterminate lung lesions ≥30 mm in diameter were enrolled in a pilot trial. Cases were considered successful when the virtual line indicated by the template in the first CT scan was pointing at the target, and the rate of success was recorded. The insertion deviation, procedural duration, radiation exposure, biopsy-related complications, and diagnostic yield were documented as well.

Results: A total of 20 patients consented to participate, and 2 withdrew. The remaining 18 participants consisting of 11 men and 7 women with a median age of 63 [inter-quartile range (IQR), 50-68] years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 23.5 (IQR, 20.8-25.8) kg/m2 received template-guided FNA. The median nodule size of the patients was 41.2 (IQR, 36.2-51.9) mm and 17 lesions were successfully targeted (success rate, 94.4%). One lesion was not reached through the designed trajectory due to an unpredictable alteration of the lesion's location resulting from pleural effusion. The median deviation between the actual position of the needle tip and the designed route was 9.4 (IQR, 6.8-11.7) mm. The median procedural duration was 10.7 (IQR, 9.7-11.8) min, and the median radiation exposure was 220.9 (IQR, 198.6-249.5) mGy×cm. No major biopsy-related complication was encountered. Definitive diagnosis of malignancy was reached in 13 of the 17 (76.5%) participants.

Conclusions: The feasibility and safety of navigational template-guided FNA were preliminarily validated in lung biopsy cohort. Nonetheless, patients with pleural effusion were not recommended to undergo FNA guided by such technique.

Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03325907).

Keywords: Lung biopsy; computed tomography (CT); fine-needle aspiration (FNA); three-dimensional printing (3D printing).

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-172/coif). YW is a current employee of Lanhui Medical Technology Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Insertion route design and reconstruction of the CT images. The insertion route was designed by the referring pulmonologist based on the CT images (A). The whole thorax consisting of the target lesion (red part), insertion route (blue part), thoracic contour surface (purple part), and bony cage (grey part) was reconstructed and shown from the back (B) view. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Navigational template design process. Prominent anatomical landmarks guiding accurate localization of the template were selected and horizontally projected (A). The navigational template was delineated according to the contour of the body surface encompassing the anatomical landmarks and insertion route (B). The overlapping part of the navigational template and projection parts of the anatomical landmarks were eliminated by means of a Boolean algorithm (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Template-guided biopsy procedure. After the placement of the template, the first CT scan was performed to evaluate the appropriateness of needle insertion, and an imaginary yellow line was drawn through the protrusion of the template (step 1). After the confirmation CT scan, sterilization and local anesthesia were subsequently administered. The biopsy needle was then inserted to the preset depth (step 2), and another CT scan was performed to calculate the insertion deviation (step 3), after which the core of the biopsy needle was drawn out and the needle was connected to a 50 mL syringe. The force inside the syringe created a vacuum, which allowed for the tumor cells to be suctioned out through the needle (step 4). CT, computed tomography; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Deviations of template-guided FNA. The deviations of template-guided FNA were demonstrated three-dimensionally (A). Positive values for CD, AD, or SD indicated that the biopsy needle deviated medially, anteriorly, or cranially, respectively. The deviations in each dimension were further compared (B). The horizontal line in each box indicates the median, while the top and bottom borders of each box indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The ends of the whiskers above and below each box indicate the minimum and maximum values. FNA, fine-needle aspiration; CD, coronal deviation; AD, axial deviation; SD, sagittal deviation.

References

    1. Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003;58:920-36. 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920
    1. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143:e142S-65S.
    1. García Río F, Díaz Lobato S, Pino JM, et al. Value of CT-guided fine needle aspiration in solitary pulmonary nodules with negative fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Acta Radiol 1994;35:478-80. 10.1177/028418519403500517
    1. Böcking A, Klose KC, Kyll HJ, et al. Cytologic versus histologic evaluation of needle biopsy of the lung, hilum and mediastinum. Sensitivity, specificity and typing accuracy. Acta Cytol 1995;39:463-71.
    1. Li H, Boiselle PM, Shepard JO, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:105-9. 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659351
    1. Santambrogio L, Nosotti M, Bellaviti N, et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solitary pulmonary nodules: a prospective, randomized study of immediate cytologic evaluation. Chest 1997;112:423-5. 10.1378/chest.112.2.423
    1. Larscheid RC, Thorpe PE, Scott WJ. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: a comprehensive review of its current role in the diagnosis and treatment of lung tumors. Chest 1998;114:704-9. 10.1378/chest.114.3.704
    1. Arslan S, Yilmaz A, Bayramgürler B, et al. CT- guided transthoracic fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions: accuracy and complications in 294 patients. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:CR493-7.
    1. Wallace MJ, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD, et al. CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of small (< or =1-cm) pulmonary lesions. Radiology 2002;225:823-8. 10.1148/radiol.2253011465
    1. Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003;229:475-81. 10.1148/radiol.2291020499
    1. Laspas F, Roussakis A, Efthimiadou R, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided fine-needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions: Results and complications in 409 patients. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008;52:458-62. 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01990.x
    1. Choi SH, Chae EJ, Kim JE, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm: analysis of outcomes of 305 procedures from a tertiary referral center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:964-70. 10.2214/AJR.12.10156
    1. Laurent F, Latrabe V, Vergier B, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the lung: comparison between aspiration and automated cutting needles using a coaxial technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000;23:266-72. 10.1007/s002700010067
    1. Noh TJ, Lee CH, Kang YA, et al. Chest computed tomography (CT) immediately after CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy as a predictor of overt pneumothorax. Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:343-9. 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.4.343
    1. Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of CT-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of lung lesions: a study based on the experience of the cytopathologist. Acta Radiol 2010;51:527-33. 10.3109/02841851003691979
    1. Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for pneumothorax and chest tube placement after CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of the procedures conducted over a 9-year period. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:809-14. 10.2214/AJR.09.3224
    1. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, et al. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:137-44. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00003
    1. Kuban JD, Tam AL, Huang SY, et al. The Effect of Needle Gauge on the Risk of Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement After Percutaneous Computed Tomographic (CT)-Guided Lung Biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38:1595-602. 10.1007/s00270-015-1097-0
    1. Anzidei M, Sacconi B, Fraioli F, et al. Development of a prediction model and risk score for procedure-related complications in patients undergoing percutaneous computed tomography-guided lung biopsy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;48:e1-6. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv172
    1. Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, et al. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:138-48. 10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8
    1. Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery 2016;159:1485-500. 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017
    1. Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, et al. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:600-6. 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.023
    1. Liu YF, Xu LW, Zhu HY, et al. Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online 2014;13:63. 10.1186/1475-925X-13-63
    1. Schweizer A, Fürnstahl P, Nagy L. Three-dimensional correction of distal radius intra-articular malunions using patient-specific drill guides. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:2339-47. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.023
    1. Liang J, Zhao Y, Gao X, et al. Design of custom-made navigational template of femoral head and pilot research in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. BMC Surg 2020;20:144. 10.1186/s12893-020-00807-7
    1. Li Z, Xu D, Li F, et al. Design and application of a novel patient-specific 3D printed drill navigational guiding template in percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation: A cadaveric study. J Clin Neurosci 2020;73:294-8. 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.083
    1. Zhang L, Li M, Li Z, et al. Three-dimensional printing of navigational template in localization of pulmonary nodule: A pilot study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;154:2113-9.e7. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.065
    1. Sun W, Zhang L, Wang L, et al. Three-Dimensionally Printed Template for Percutaneous Localization of Multiple Lung Nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;108:883-8. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.060
    1. Zhang L, Wang L, Kadeer X, et al. Accuracy of a 3-Dimensionally Printed Navigational Template for Localizing Small Pulmonary Nodules: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2019;154:295-303. 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4872
    1. Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, et al. Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2000;117:1049-54. 10.1378/chest.117.4.1049
    1. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:S199-202. 10.1097/01.RVI.0000094584.83406.3e
    1. Michel M, Jacob S, Roger G, et al. Eye lens radiation exposure and repeated head CT scans: A problem to keep in mind. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1896-900. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.051
    1. Fu YF, Li GC, Xu QS, et al. Computed tomography-guided lung biopsy: a randomized controlled trial of low-dose versus standard-dose protocol. Eur Radiol 2020;30:1584-92. 10.1007/s00330-019-06464-6
    1. Sun Q, Mai Y, Yang R, et al. Fast and accurate online calibration of optical see-through head-mounted display for AR-based surgical navigation using Microsoft HoloLens. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2020;15:1907-19. 10.1007/s11548-020-02246-4
    1. Chen X, Xu L, Wang Y, et al. Development of a surgical navigation system based on augmented reality using an optical see-through head-mounted display. J Biomed Inform 2015;55:124-31. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.003
    1. Folch EE, Pritchett MA, Nead MA, et al. Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: One-Year Results of the Prospective, Multicenter NAVIGATE Study. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14:445-58. 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.013
    1. Ishiwata T, Ujiie H, Gregor A, et al. Pilot study using virtual 4-D tracking electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a single center prospective study. J Thorac Dis 2021;13:2885-95. 10.21037/jtd-21-141

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel