Peripheral venous catheter complications in children: predisposing factors in a multicenter prospective cohort study

Rim Ben Abdelaziz, Habiba Hafsi, Hela Hajji, Hela Boudabous, Amel Ben Chehida, Ali Mrabet, Khadija Boussetta, Sihem Barsaoui, Azza Sammoud, Mourad Hamzaoui, Hatem Azzouz, Néji Tebib, Rim Ben Abdelaziz, Habiba Hafsi, Hela Hajji, Hela Boudabous, Amel Ben Chehida, Ali Mrabet, Khadija Boussetta, Sihem Barsaoui, Azza Sammoud, Mourad Hamzaoui, Hatem Azzouz, Néji Tebib

Abstract

Background: Peripheral venous catheterization (PVC) is frequently used in children. This procedure is not free from potential complications. Our purpose was to identify the types and incidences of PVC complications in children and their predisposing factors in a developing country.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational multicenter study in five pediatric and pediatric surgery departments over a period of 2 months. Two hundred fifteen PVC procedures were conducted in 98 children. The times of insertion and removal and the reasons for termination were noted, and the lifespan was calculated. Descriptive data were expressed as percentages, means, standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges. The Chi2 test or the Fisher test, with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI95%), as well as Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical and quantitative variables, respectively, in groups with and without complications. The Spearman test was used to determine correlations between the lifespan and the quantitative variables. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to test for differences in the median lifespan within 3 or more subgroups of a variable. Linear regression and logistic binary regression were used for multivariate analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The mean lifespan was 68.82 ± 35.71 h. A local complication occurred in 111 PIVC (51.9%) cases. The risk factors identified were a small catheter gauge (24-gauge) (p = 0.023), the use of a volume-controlled burette (p = 0.036), a longer duration of intravenous therapy (p < 0.001), a medical diagnosis of respiratory or infectious disease (p = 0.047), the use of antibiotics (p = 0.005), including cefotaxime (p = 0.024) and vancomycin (p = 0.031), and the use of proton pump inhibitors (p = 0.004).The lifespan of the catheters was reduced with the occurrence of a complication (p < 0.001), including the use of 24-gauge catheters (p = 0.001), the use of an electronic pump or syringe(p = 0.036) and a higher rank of the intravenous device in each patient (p = 0.010).

Conclusions: PVC complications were frequent in our pediatric departments and are often associated with misuse of the device. These results could engender awareness among both doctors and nurses regarding the need for rationalization of the use of PVC and better adherence to the recommendations for the use of each drug and each administration method.

Keywords: Children; Complication; Extravasation; Lifespan; Peripheral venous catheter; Prevention.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The La Rabta University Hospital Local Clinical Research Ethics Committee evaluated and approved the study protocol. All patients and their parents or legal representatives provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Waitt C, Waitt P, Pirmohamed M. Intravenous therapy. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(939):1–6. doi: 10.1136/pmj.2003.010421.
    1. Datta S, Hanning CD. How to insert a peripheral venous cannula. Br J Hosp Med. 1990;43(1):67–69.
    1. Zempsky WT. Optimizing the management of peripheral venous access pain in children: evidence, impact, and implementation. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 3):S121–S124. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1055c.
    1. Kennedy RM, Luhmann J, Zempsky WT. Clinical implications of unmanaged needle-insertion pain and distress in children. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 3):S130–S133. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1055e.
    1. Pettit J. Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications. Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. 2003;3(1):14–26. doi: 10.1053/adnc.2003.50011.
    1. Gupta P, Rai R, Basu S, Faridi MM. Lifespan of peripheral intravenous cannula in a neonatal intensive care unit of a developing country. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18(4):287–292. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(03)00052-6.
    1. Legemaat M, Carr PJ, van Rens RM, van Dijk M, Poslawsky IE, van den Hoogen A. Peripheral intravenous cannulation: complication rates in the neonatal population: a multicenter observational study. The journal of vascular access. 2016;17(4):360–365. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000558.
    1. Franck LS, Hummel D, Connell K, Quinn D, Montgomery J. The safety and efficacy of peripheral intravenous catheters in ill neonates. Neonatal network : NN. 2001;20(5):33–38. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.20.5.33.
    1. Danski MT, Mingorance P, Johann DA, Vayego SA, Lind J. Incidence of local complications and risk factors associated with peripheral intravenous catheter in neonates. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2016;50(1):22–28. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420160000100003.
    1. Dalal SS, Chawla D, Singh J, Agarwal RK, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Limb splinting for intravenous cannulae in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(6):F394–F396. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.147595.
    1. Malyon L, Ullman AJ, Phillips N, Young J, Kleidon T, Murfield J, Rickard CM. Peripheral intravenous catheter duration and failure in paediatric acute care: a prospective cohort study. Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA. 2014;26(6):602–608. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12305.
    1. de Lima Jacinto AK, Avelar AF, Pedreira ML. Predisposing factors for infiltration in children submitted to peripheral venous catheterization. Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society. 2011;34(6):391–398. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3182306491.
    1. Hetzler R, Wilson M, Hill EK, Hollenback C. Securing pediatric peripheral i.V. Catheters--application of an evidence-based practice model. J Pediatr Nurs. 2011;26(2):143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.12.008.
    1. Foster L, Wallis M, Paterson B, James H. A descriptive study of peripheral intravenous catheters in patients admitted to a pediatric unit in one Australian hospital. Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society. 2002;25(3):159–167. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200205000-00003.
    1. Tripathi S, Kaushik V, Singh V. Peripheral IVs: factors affecting complications and patency--a randomized controlled trial. Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society. 2008;31(3):182–188. doi: 10.1097/01.NAN.0000317704.03415.b9.
    1. Unbeck M, Forberg U, Ygge BM, Ehrenberg A, Petzold M, Johansson E. Peripheral venous catheter related complications are common among paediatric and neonatal patients. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(6):566–574. doi: 10.1111/apa.12963.
    1. Shenoy S, Karunakar BP. Factors influencing the peripheral venous catheter survival in critically ill children in a pediatric intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(12):1293–1296. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1430-7.
    1. Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, Marsh N, Gowardman J, Playford EG, Rickard CM. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(1):63–68. doi: 10.1086/674398.
    1. Pettit J. Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 1. Detecting the most frequently occurring complications. Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. 2002;2(6):304–315. doi: 10.1053/adnc.2002.36826.
    1. Tekindur S, Yetim M, Kilickaya O. Ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(8):1675.
    1. Kuo CC, Wu CY, Feng IJ, Lee WJ. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hu li za zhi The journal of nursing. 2016;63(6):89–101.
    1. Demir D, Inal S: Does the use of a vein visualization device for peripheral venous catheter placement increase success rate in pediatric patients? Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001007. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, Marsh N, McGrail MR, French V, Foster L, Gallagher P, Gowardman JR, Zhang L, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9847):1066–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4.
    1. Silva M, Auguste AJ, Terzian ACB, Vedovello D, Riet-Correa F, Macario VMK, Mourao MPG, Ullmann LS, Araujo JP, Jr, Weaver SC, et al. Isolation and characterization of Madariaga virus from a horse in Paraiba state. Brazil Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(3):990–993. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12441.
    1. Hugill K. Is there an optimal way of securing peripheral IV catheters in children? British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) 2016;25(19):S20–S21. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.19.S20.
    1. Gorski LA. The 2016 infusion therapy standards of practice. Home Healthc Now. 2017;35(1):10–18.
    1. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–718. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052.
    1. Thigpen JL. Peripheral intravenous extravasation: nursing procedure for initial treatment. Neonatal network : NN. 2007;26(6):379–384. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.26.6.379.
    1. Shimandle RB, Johnson D, Baker M, Stotland N, Karrison T, Arnow PM. Safety of peripheral intravenous catheters in children. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(11):736–740. doi: 10.1086/501574.
    1. Machado AF, Pedreira ML, Chaud MN. Prospective, randomized and controlled trial on the dwell time of peripheral intravenous catheters in children, according to three dressing regimens. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem. 2005;13(3):291–298. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692005000300002.
    1. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;8:CD007798.
    1. Phelps SJ, Helms RA. Risk factors affecting infiltration of peripheral venous lines in infants. J Pediatr. 1987;111(3):384–389. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80458-4.
    1. Forni C, Loro L, Tremosini M, Trofa C, D'Alessandro F, Sabbatini T, Kapron M, Genco R, Schiavone M. Borri C et al: [cohort study of peripheral catheter related complications and identification of predictive factors in a population of orthopedic patients] Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca : AIR. 2010;29(4):166–173.
    1. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, Golsorkhi M, Tingle A, Bak A, Browne J, Prieto J, Wilcox M. Health UKDo: epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. The Journal of hospital infection. 2014;86(Suppl 1):S1–70. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2.
    1. Djian C, Nicolas C, Janoly-Dumenil A, MM P. Flow control regulator: misuse and new guidelines. J Pharm Clin. 2008;27(2):65–72.
    1. Limm EI, Fang X, Dendle C, Stuart RL, Egerton Warburton D. Half of all peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain? Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(5):521–525. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.022.
    1. Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;67:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.007.
    1. Livesley J, Richardson S. Securing methods for peripheral cannulae. Nurs Stand. 1993;7(31):31–34. doi: 10.7748/ns.7.31.31.s41.
    1. Laudenbach N, Braun CA, Klaverkamp L, Hedman-Dennis S. Peripheral i.V. Stabilization and the rate of complications in children: an exploratory study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(4):348–353. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.02.002.
    1. Small H, Adams D, Casey AL, Crosby CT, Lambert PA, Elliott T. Efficacy of adding 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate to 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to peripheral venous cannulation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(10):963–965. doi: 10.1086/590664.
    1. Goudet V, Timsit JF, Lucet JC, Lepape A, Balayn D, Seguin S, Mimoz O. Comparison of four skin preparation strategies to prevent catheter-related infection in intensive care unit (CLEAN trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-114.
    1. Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;67:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.007.
    1. Ullman A, Marsh N, Rickard C. Securement for vascular access devices: looking to the future. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) 2017;26(8):S24–S26. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.8.S24.
    1. Goossens GA. Flushing and locking of venous catheters: available evidence and evidence deficit. Nursing research and practice. 2015;2015:985686. doi: 10.1155/2015/985686.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel