The relationship between unsupervised time after school and physical activity in adolescent girls

Berenice R Rushovich, Carolyn C Voorhees, C E Davis, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Karin A Pfeiffer, John P Elder, Scott Going, Vivian G Marino, Berenice R Rushovich, Carolyn C Voorhees, C E Davis, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Karin A Pfeiffer, John P Elder, Scott Going, Vivian G Marino

Abstract

Background: Rising obesity and declining physical activity levels are of great concern because of the associated health risks. Many children are left unsupervised after the school day ends, but little is known about the association between unsupervised time and physical activity levels. This paper seeks to determine whether adolescent girls who are without adult supervision after school are more or less active than their peers who have a caregiver at home.

Methods: A random sample of girls from 36 middle schools at 6 field sites across the U.S. was selected during the fall of the 2002-2003 school year to participate in the baseline measurement activities of the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG). Information was collected using six-day objectively measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity using a three-day recall, and socioeconomic and psychosocial measures. Complete information was available for 1422 out of a total of 1596 respondents.Categorical variables were analyzed using chi square and continuous variables were analyzed by t-tests. The four categories of time alone were compared using a mixed linear model controlling for clustering effects by study center.

Results: Girls who spent more time after school (> or = 2 hours per day, > or = 2 days per week) without adult supervision were more active than those with adult supervision (p = 0.01). Girls alone for > or = 2 hours after school, > or = 2 days a week, on average accrue 7.55 minutes more moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day than do girls who are supervised (95% confidence interval ([C.I]). These results adjusted for ethnicity, parent's education, participation in the free/reduced lunch program, neighborhood resources, or available transportation. Unsupervised girls (n = 279) did less homework (53.1% vs. 63.3%), spent less time riding in a car or bus (48.0% vs. 56.6%), talked on the phone more (35.5% vs. 21.1%), and watched more television (59.9% vs. 52.6%) than supervised girls (n = 569). However, unsupervised girls also were more likely to be dancing (14.0% vs. 9.3%) and listening to music (20.8% vs. 12.0%) (p < .05).

Conclusion: Girls in an unsupervised environment engaged in fewer structured activities and did not immediately do their homework, but they were more likely to be physically active than supervised girls. These results may have implications for parents, school, and community agencies as to how to structure activities in order to encourage teenage girls to be more physically active.

References

    1. Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280:1371–1374. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5368.1371.
    1. Rowland T. The role of physical activity and fitness in children in the prevention of adult cardiovascular disease. Progress in Pediatric Cardiology. 2001;12:199–203. doi: 10.1016/S1058-9813(00)00074-6.
    1. Hager R, Tucker L, Selijaas G. Aerobic fitness, blood lipids, and body fat in children. American Journal of Public Health. 1995;85:1702–1706.
    1. Hagberg J, Goldring D, Ehsani A, Heath G, Hernandez A, Schechtman K, Holloszy J. Effect of exercised training on the blood pressure and hemodynamic features of hypertensive adolescents. American Journal of Cardiology. 1983;52:763–768. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90412-5.
    1. Tolfrey K, Jones A, Campbell I. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the lipid-lipoprotein profile of children and adolescents. Sports Medicine. 2000;26:99–112. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029020-00003.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. USDHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 1996.
    1. Kimm SYS, Obarzanek E. Childhood obesity: A new pandemic of the New Millennium. Pediatrics. 2002;110:1003–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.1003.
    1. Kimm S, Glynn N, Kriska A, Fitzgerald S, Aaron D, Similo S, McMahon R, Barton B. Longitudinal changes in physical activity in a biracial cohort during adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1445–1454. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00013.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2003. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2004;53:1–29.
    1. Kvaavik E, Tell GS, Klepp KI. Predictors and Tracking of Body Mass Index From Adolescence Into Adulthood: Follow-up of 18 to 20 Years in the Oslo Youth Study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:1212–1218. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1212.
    1. Patrick K, Norman GJ, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF, Zabinski MF, Rupp J, Cella J. Diet, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behaviors as Risk Factors for Overweight in Adolescence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:385–390. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.4.385.
    1. Flegal K, Troiano R. Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. International Journal of Obesity. 2000;24:807–818. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801232.
    1. Feldman DE, Barnett T, Shrier I, Rossignol M, Abenhaim L. Is Physical Activity Differentially Associated With Different Types of Sedentary Pursuits? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:797–802. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.797.
    1. Gordon-Larsen P, McMurray RG, Popkin BM. Determinants of Adolescent Physical Activity and Inactivity Patterns. Pediatrics. 2000;105:E83. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.e83.
    1. After School Alliance: America After 3 pm: A Household Survey on After school in America [Date cited 5/14/2006]
    1. Mott JA. After-school supervision and adolescent cigarette smoking: contributions of the setting and intensity of after-school self-care. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1999;22:35–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1018747602026.
    1. Gambone MA, Arbreton AJ. Safe Havens: the contributions of youth organizations to healthy adolescent development. Public/PrivateVentures. 1997. [Date cited 6/7/2006]
    1. Heart House [Date cited 6/7/2006]
    1. Pettit GS, Bates JE, Dodge KA, Meece DW. The impact of after-school peer contact on early adolescent externalizing problems is moderated by parental monitoring, perceived neighborhood safety, and prior adjustment. Child Development. 1999;70:768–778. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00055.
    1. Bettinger JA, Celentano DD, Curriero FC, Adler NE, Millstein SG, Ellen JM. Does parental involvement predict new sexually transmitted diseases in female adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:666–670. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.7.666.
    1. Anderssen N, Wold B. Parental and peer influences on leisure-time activity in young adolescents. Research Quarterly of Exercise and Sport. 1992;63:341–8.
    1. Morgan CF, McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Broyles SL, Zive MM, Nader PR. Personal, social and environmental correlates of physical activity in a bi-ethnic sample of adolescents. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2003;15:288–30.
    1. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Tharp T, Rex J. Factors associated with changes in physical activity: a cohort study of inactive adolescent girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:803–10. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.803.
    1. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC, Hill JO, Geraci JC. Correlates of physical activity in a national sample of girls and boys in grades 4 through 12. Health Psychology. 1999;18:410–5. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.410.
    1. Voorhees CC, Murray DM, Welk G, Birnbaum A, Ribisil K, Johnson C, Pfeiffer K, Saksvig B, Jobe J. The role of peer social network factors and physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2005;29:183–189.
    1. Macintyre S, Mutri N. Socio-economic differences in cardiovascular diseases and physical activity: stereotypes and reality. J R Soc Health. 2004;124:66–9.
    1. Stevens J, Murray DM, Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Lytle LA, Elder JP, Young DR, Simons-Morton DG, Webber LS. Design of the Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG) Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26:223–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.011.
    1. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR. Validation of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:629–633.
    1. Welk G, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S489–S497. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00008.
    1. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res. 2002;10:150–157.
    1. Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, McMurray RG, Murray DM, Almeida MJ, Going S, Norman JE, Pate R. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1259–1266.
    1. Catellier JD, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, Addy CL, Conway TL, Yang S, Rice JC. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S555–S562. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185651.59486.4e.
    1. Trost SG, Ward DS, McGraw B, Pate RR. Validity of the previous day physical activity recall (PDPAR) in fifth-grade children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1999;11:341–348.
    1. Weston AT, Petosa R, Pate RR. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:138–143.
    1. Evenson KR, Birnbaum AS, Bedimo-Rung AL, Sallis JF, Voorhees CC, Ring K, Elder JP. Girl's perception of physical environmental factors and transportation access: Reliability and association with physical activity and active transport to school. Under Review.
    1. McMurray RG, Ring KB, Treuth MS, Welk GJ, Pate RR, Schmitz KH, Pickrel JL, Gonzalez V, Ameida MJ, Rohm Young D, Sallis JF. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Medicine Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:2135–43. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000147628.78551.3B.
    1. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson C, Pratt C, Grieser M, Pickrel J, Stone E, Conway T, Coombs D. Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: "State of the Art" and the TAAG approach. Health Education and Behavior.
    1. Dunton GF, Jammer MS, Cooper DM. Assessing the perceived environment among minimally active adolescent girls: Validity and relations to physical activity outcomes. American Journal of Health Promotions. 2003;18:70–3.
    1. Sturm R. Childhood obesity – what we can learn from existing data on societal trends, part 1. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005. [serial online] [date cited 6/8/2005]
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Malina RM, Song TMK, Bouchard C. Television viewing, physical activity, and health-related fitness of youth in the Québec family study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1998;23:318–325. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00070-6.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel