T cell priming versus T cell tolerance induced by synthetic peptides

P Aichele, K Brduscha-Riem, R M Zinkernagel, H Hengartner, H Pircher, P Aichele, K Brduscha-Riem, R M Zinkernagel, H Hengartner, H Pircher

Abstract

It is well known that synthetic peptides are able to both induce and tolerize T cells. We have examined the parameters leading either to priming or tolerance of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in vivo with a major histocompatibility complex class I (H-2 Db) binding peptide derived from the glycoprotein (GP aa33-41) of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). By varying dose, route, and frequency of LCMV GP peptide application, we found that a single local subcutaneous injection of 50-500 micrograms peptide emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant protected mice against LCMV infection, whereas repetitive and systemic intraperitoneal application of the same dose caused tolerance of LCMV-specific CTL. The peptide-induced tolerance was transient in euthymic mice but permanent in thymectomized mice. These findings are relevant for a selective use of peptides as a therapeutic approach: peptide-induced priming of T cells for vaccination and peptide-mediated T cell tolerance for intervention in immunopathologies and autoimmune diseases.

References

    1. Nature. 1993 Nov 4;366(6450):72-5
    1. Nature. 1991 Oct 31;353(6347):858-61
    1. Int Immunol. 1993 Oct;5(10):1285-92
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):437-8
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):444-8
    1. Science. 1994 Feb 25;263(5150):1139-43
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5627-31
    1. Immunity. 1994 Jul;1(4):327-39
    1. Immunity. 1994 Sep;1(6):443-6
    1. Immunology. 1962 May;5:378-88
    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Dec 15;161:275-92
    1. Science. 1970 Sep 11;169(3950):1042-9
    1. Science. 1971 Feb 26;171(3973):813-5
    1. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1975 Feb;53(1):27-42
    1. J Exp Med. 1985 May 1;161(5):897-911
    1. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):457-67
    1. J Exp Med. 1985 Dec 1;162(6):2125-41
    1. Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):959-68
    1. Annu Rev Immunol. 1986;4:369-88
    1. Nature. 1986 Dec 11-17;324(6097):578-9
    1. Science. 1991 Dec 13;254(5038):1643-7
    1. Curr Opin Immunol. 1992 Aug;4(4):449-53
    1. Science. 1992 Nov 27;258(5087):1491-4
    1. Nature. 1993 Apr 22;362(6422):758-61
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1993 Aug;23(8):1956-62
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7608-12
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1993 Sep;23(9):2242-9
    1. J Exp Med. 1993 Nov 1;178(5):1783-8
    1. Nature. 1993 Nov 4;366(6450):69-72
    1. Science. 1987 Feb 27;235(4792):1059-62
    1. Nature. 1987 Oct 8-14;329(6139):512-8
    1. Nature. 1987 Oct 8-14;329(6139):547-9
    1. J Exp Med. 1989 Mar 1;169(3):603-12
    1. J Exp Med. 1989 May 1;169(5):1681-91
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1989 Sep;19(9):1657-67
    1. Cell. 1989 Nov 17;59(4):603-14
    1. Nature. 1989 Nov 30;342(6249):561-4
    1. Nature. 1990 Jan 25;343(6256):381-3
    1. J Exp Med. 1990 May 1;171(5):1815-20
    1. Nature. 1990 Aug 16;346(6285):629-33
    1. Nature. 1990 Nov 15;348(6298):248-51
    1. Nature. 1990 Nov 15;348(6298):252-4
    1. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1249-56
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 1;88(3):991-3
    1. J Immunol. 1991 Mar 15;146(6):1987-95
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2283-7
    1. Nature. 1991 May 23;351(6324):290-6
    1. Nature. 1991 Oct 17;353(6345):622-7
    1. J Virol Methods. 1991 Jun;33(1-2):191-8
    1. J Immunol. 1991 Nov 15;147(10):3268-73
    1. Int Immunol. 1993 Sep;5(9):1159-65

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel