Promoting effective child development practices in the first year of life: does timing make a difference?

Anna Roia, Elena Paviotti, Valentina Ferluga, Marcella Montico, Lorenzo Monasta, Luca Ronfani, Giorgio Tamburlini, Anna Roia, Elena Paviotti, Valentina Ferluga, Marcella Montico, Lorenzo Monasta, Luca Ronfani, Giorgio Tamburlini

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing need for parenting programs aimed at promoting parent-child interaction. A variety of interventions have been proposed. The use of audiovisual materials for parents has been shown to be effective but limited information is available on the optimal timing for its use, particularly for new parents during the first year of life of their children. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a video administered at two different times to first-time parents in modifying parental knowledge, attitudes and intentions with regards to effective care practices.

Methods: Open randomized controlled trial carried out in a referral mother and child hospital. Eligible parents were randomly assigned to receive a video at one month (early intervention) or at seven months (late intervention) of age of their child. The video addressed four specific activities related to early child development: reading aloud to the baby, early exposure to music, promotion of early socialization for parents and for children. The primary outcome was the proportion of parents who declared that their knowledge, attitudes and intentions changed after having seen the video at one or seven months of age of the child.

Results: One hundred and five families were randomly allocated either to the early (53) or to the late (52) intervention group. For 99 families (52 in the early and 47 in the late group) a complete outcome evaluation was available. Parents included in the early administration group more frequently reported modifications in their knowledge of the suggested practices while parents in the late group more frequently reported a change in their attitudes. This finding was consistent across all four practices. The video was found to influence parental intentions in the great majority of interviewed parents with no significant difference between groups (82.7% and 87.2% in the early and late intervention group, respectively).

Conclusions: Audiovisual materials can be an effective complementary tool in programs aimed at supporting parents, particularly those dealing with their first baby. The results provide some useful insights into the differential benefits of using audiovisual aids at different times during the first year of life of the baby.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02120430.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Feelings elicited by the video.

References

    1. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, Black MM, Nelson CA, Huffman SL, Baker-Henningham H, Chang SM, Hamadani JD, Lozoff B, Gardner JM, Powell CA, Rahman A, Richter L. Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet. 2011;378:1325–1338. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2.
    1. Barlow J. Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Parent Training in Improving Behaviour of Children. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit; 1999.
    1. Gwynne K, Blick BA, Duffy GM. Pilot evaluation of an early intervention programme for children at risk. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009;45:118–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01439.x.
    1. Kendrick D, Elkan R, Hewitt M, Dewey M, Blair M, Robinson J, Williams D, Brummell K. Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? a systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:443–451. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.6.443.
    1. Engle PL, Fernald LC, Alderman H, Behrman J, O'Gara C, Yousafzai A, de Mello MC, Hidrobo M, Ulkuer N, Ertem I, Iltus S, Global Child Development Steering Group Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378:1339–1353. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60889-1.
    1. Howard KS, Brooks-Gunn J. The role of home-visiting programs in preventing child abuse and neglect. Future Child. 2009;19:119–146. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0032.
    1. Love JM, Chazan-Cohen R, Raikes H, Brooks-Gunn J. What makes a difference: early head start evaluation findings in a developmental context. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013;78(vii-viii):1–173.
    1. Häggman-Laitila A, Seppänen R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Benefits of video training on families’ health and interaction: evaluation based on follow-up visits. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:3504–3515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03241.x.
    1. Lawrence PJ, Davies B, Ramchandani PG. Using video feedback to improve early father-infant interaction: a pilot study. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;18:61–71. doi: 10.1177/1359104512437210.
    1. Moss E, Dubois-Comtois K, Cyr C, Tarabulsy GM, St-Laurent D, Bernier A. Efficacy of a home-visiting intervention aimed at improving maternal sensitivity, child attachment, and behavioral outcomes for maltreated children: a randomized control trial. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:195–210. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000738.
    1. Crisp BR, Lister PG. Child protection and public health: nurses’ responsibilities. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:656–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03154.x.
    1. Long A, McCarney S, Smyth G, Magorrian N, Dillon A. The effectiveness of parenting programmes facilitated by health visitors. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34:611–620. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01790.x.
    1. Onyskiw JE. Health and use of health services of children exposed to violence in their families. Can J Public Health. 2002;93:416–420.
    1. Laflamme MR, Wilcox DC, Sullivan J, Schadow G, Lindbergh D, Warvel J, Buchanan H, Ising T, Abernathy G, Perkins SM, Daggy J, Frankel RM, Dexter P, McDonald CJ, Weiner M. A pilot study of usefulness of clinician-patient videoconferencing for making routine medical decisions in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1380–1385. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53422.x.
    1. Secco L, Woodgate R, Ateah C. Review: self help, media-based therapy is effective for behaviour problems in children. Evid Based Nurs. 2002;5:11. doi: 10.1136/ebn.5.1.11.
    1. Wilkinson N, Ang RP, Goh DH. Online video game therapy for mental health concerns: a review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008;54:370–382. doi: 10.1177/0020764008091659.
    1. Groeneveld MG, Vermeer HJ, van Ijzendoorn MH, Linting M. Enhancing home-based child care quality through video-feedback intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25:86–96. doi: 10.1037/a0022451.
    1. Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Flynn V, Tomopoulos S, Rovira I, Tineo W, Pebenito C, Torres C, Torres H, Nixon AF. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26:34–41.
    1. Mendelsohn AL, Valdez PT, Flynn V, Foley GM, Berkule SB, Tomopoulos S, Fierman AH, Tineo W, Dreyer BP. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care: impact at 33 months on parenting and on child development. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007;28:206–212. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3180324d87.
    1. Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Brockmeyer CA, Berkule-Silberman SB, Huberman HS, Tomopoulos S. Randomized controlled trial of primary care pediatric parenting programs: effect on reduced media exposure in infants, mediated through enhanced parent–child interaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:42–48.
    1. Sices L, Drotar D, Keilman A, Kirchner HL, Roberts D, Stancin T. Communication about child development during well-child visits: impact of video Parents’ evaluation of developmental status screener with or without an informational video. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e1091–e1099. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1773.
    1. Alsada LH, Sigal MJ, Limeback H, Fiege J, Kulkarni GV. Development and testing of an audio-visual aid for improving infant oral health through primary caregiver education. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(241):241a–241 h.
    1. Hieftje K, Edelman EJ, Camenga DR, Fiellin LE. Electronic media-based health interventions promoting behavior change in youth: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:574–580. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1095.
    1. Ismail AI, Ondersma S, Jedele JM, Little RJ, Lepkowski JM. Evaluation of a brief tailored motivational intervention to prevent early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39:433–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00613.x.
    1. Kingston G, Gray MA, Williams G. A critical review of the evidence on the use of videotapes or DVD to promote patient compliance with home programmes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:153–163. doi: 10.3109/17483101003671709.
    1. Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Guttentag C. A responsive parenting intervention: the optimal timing across early childhood for impacting maternal behaviours and child outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2008;44:1335–1353. doi: 10.1037/a0013030.
    1. Bateson K, Delaney J, Pybus R. Meeting expectations: the pilot evaluation of the Solihull approach parenting group. Community Practice. 2008;81:28–31.
    1. Bradley RH, McKelvey LM, Whiteside-Mansell L. Does the quality of stimulation and support in the home environment moderate the effect of early education programs? Child Dev. 2011;82:2110–2122. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01659.x.
    1. Duursma E, Augustyn M, Zuckerman B. Reading aloud to children: the evidence. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:554–557. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.106336.
    1. Toffol G, Melloni M, Cagnin R, Sanzovo M, Giacobbi L, Montini C. Effectiveness study of the project “Nati per Leggere”. Quaderni ACP. 2011;5:195–201.
    1. Walworth D. Effects of developmental music groups for parents and premature or typical infants under two years on parental responsiveness and children social development. J Music Ther. 2009;46:32–52. doi: 10.1093/jmt/46.1.32.
    1. Hamblin AC. Evaluation and Control of Training. London: McGraw-Hill; 1974.
    1. Bloom BS. Tassonomia degli obiettivi educativi-La classificazione delle mete dell’educazione. Giunti & Lisciani: Florence; 1986.
    1. Colasanti AR, Mastromarino M. Ascolto attivo. IFREP: Roma; 1994.
    1. Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker M, Middlestadt SE, Eichler A. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. In: Baum A, Revenson TA, Singer JE, editors. Handbook of health psychology. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001. pp. 3–17.
    1. Tamburlini G, Manetti S, Toffol G. Primary health care and early childhood development. Lancet. 2011;378:e16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61838-2.
    1. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Hewitt M, Robinson JJA, Tolley K, Blair M, Dewey M, Williams D, Brummell K. The effectiveness of domiciliary health visiting: a systematic review of international studies and a selective review of the British literature. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(i-v):1–339.
    1. Drummond JE, Weir AE, Kysela GM. Home visitation practice: models, documentation and evaluation. Public Health Nurs. 2002;19:21–29. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19004.x.
    1. Skeen S, Tomlinson M. A public health approach to preventing child abuse in low- and middle-income countries: a call for action. Int J Psychol. 2013;48:108–116. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.737467.
    1. World Health Organization . Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel