Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome

Brian L McClune, Daniel J Weisdorf, Tanya L Pedersen, Gisela Tunes da Silva, Martin S Tallman, Jorge Sierra, John Dipersio, Armand Keating, Robert P Gale, Biju George, Vikas Gupta, Theresa Hahn, Luis Isola, Madan Jagasia, Hillard Lazarus, David Marks, Richard Maziarz, Edmund K Waller, Chris Bredeson, Sergio Giralt, Brian L McClune, Daniel J Weisdorf, Tanya L Pedersen, Gisela Tunes da Silva, Martin S Tallman, Jorge Sierra, John Dipersio, Armand Keating, Robert P Gale, Biju George, Vikas Gupta, Theresa Hahn, Luis Isola, Madan Jagasia, Hillard Lazarus, David Marks, Richard Maziarz, Edmund K Waller, Chris Bredeson, Sergio Giralt

Abstract

PURPOSE Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) primarily afflict older individuals. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is generally not offered because of concerns of excess morbidity and mortality. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens allow increased use of allogeneic HCT for older patients. To define prognostic factors impacting long-term outcomes of RIC regimens in patients older than age 40 years with AML in first complete remission or MDS and to determine the impact of age, we analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed data reported to the CIBMTR (1995 to 2005) on 1,080 patients undergoing RIC HCT. Outcomes analyzed included neutrophil recovery, incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Univariate analyses demonstrated no age group differences in NRM, grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, or relapse. Patients age 40 to 54, 55 to 59, 60 to 64, and > or = 65 years had 2-year survival rates as follows: 44% (95% CI, 37% to 52%), 50% (95% CI, 41% to 59%), 34% (95% CI, 25% to 43%), and 36% (95% CI, 24% to 49%), respectively, for patients with AML (P = .06); and 42% (95% CI, 35% to 49%), 35% (95% CI, 27% to 43%), 45% (95% CI, 36% to 54%), and 38% (95% CI, 25% to 51%), respectively, for patients with MDS (P = .37). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant impact of age on NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS (all P > .3). Greater HLA disparity adversely affected 2-year NRM, DFS, and OS. Unfavorable cytogenetics adversely impacted relapse, DFS, and OS. Better pre-HCT performance status predicted improved 2-year OS. CONCLUSION With these similar outcomes observed in older patients, we conclude that older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to HCT.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Cumulative incidence of (A) nonrelapse mortality (P = .66) and (B) relapse (P = .87) in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning or nonmyeloablative transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission or for myelodysplastic syndrome.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free survival (DFS) in (A) patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) and (B) patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS) in (C) patients with AML in CR1 and (D) patients with MDS. Multivariate analysis for DFS (P = .81) and OS (P = .74) is shown in Table 5.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel