Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials

Christian Lampl, Viktoria Kraus, Katrina Lehner, Brett Loop, Mahan Chehrenama, Zofia Maczynska, Shannon Ritter, Jan Klatt, Josefin Snellman, Christian Lampl, Viktoria Kraus, Katrina Lehner, Brett Loop, Mahan Chehrenama, Zofia Maczynska, Shannon Ritter, Jan Klatt, Josefin Snellman

Abstract

Background: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. There exists an unmet need to establish the safety of erenumab in older individuals, in view of existing multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes. This pooled analysis of five large migraine-prevention studies examined the safety of erenumab stratified across age groups, particularly in older populations.

Methods: Pooled and age-stratified analysis of safety data from the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of five randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 and 3 studies of erenumab in participants with episodic or chronic migraine across the age groups < 40 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, and ≥ 60 years was completed. The safety of erenumab across age groups was determined by assessing safety endpoints including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and events leading to study drug discontinuation.

Results: Overall, 3345 participants across five studies were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 1359), erenumab 70 mg (n = 1132) or erenumab 140 mg (n = 854); 3176 (94.9%) completed the DBTP, and 169 (5.1%) discontinued, mainly due to participant decision (110; 3.3%). Overall, 1349 (40.6%), 1122 (33.8%), and 850 (25.6%) participants received at least one dose of placebo, erenumab 70 mg, and erenumab 140 mg, respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was similar across all age groups for both doses of erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) and placebo (< 40 years, 44.0% vs 44.4%; 40-49 years, 42.5% vs 49.2%; 50-59 years, 46.5% vs 41.6%; ≥ 60 years, 43.8% vs 59.4%). Incidence of treatment-emergent serious AEs overall, and stratified by age groups for both doses and placebo was low (< 40 years, 0.9% vs 1.2%; 40-49 years, 1.7% vs 1.9%; and 50-59 years, 1.6% vs 1.1%), with no serious AEs reported in participants aged ≥ 60 years. No deaths were reported.

Conclusions: Erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) exhibited a similar safety profile compared with placebo across age groups in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine, with no increased emergence of events due to age. Erenumab was well tolerated in older participants with multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02066415, NCT02456740, NCT02483585, NCT03096834, NCT03333109.

Keywords: Advanced age; Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Cardiovascular; Cerebrovascular; Erenumab; Gastrointestinal; Monoclonal antibody; Older individuals; Randomized controlled trial; Safety; Tolerability.

Conflict of interest statement

Christian Lampl received honoraria from Novartis for given lectures and his participation in Advisory Board Meetings.

Victoria Krauss declares that they have no competing interests.

Katharina Lehner declares that they have no competing interests.

Mahan Chehrenama is an employee of, and holds stock in Amgen Inc.

Zofia Maczynska is a former employee of Novartis.

Jan Klatt is a former employee of, and holds stock in Novartis.

Brett Loop was an employee of Amgen Inc., US at the time of study conduct.

Brett Loop, Shannon Ritter and Josefin Snellman are employees of, and hold stocks in Novartis.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of phase 2 and 3 studies included in the pooled analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disposition of participants. *Subject decision was a sum of subject decision and subject/guardian decision. In the EMPOwER study, six randomized participants did not take the study medication and were not formally entered into the DBTP; these participants are counted under the “no study medication” category. Abbreviation: DBTP, double-blind treatment phase

References

    1. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Migraine at all ages. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006;10(3):207–213. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0047-6.
    1. Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
    1. Stovner LJ, Nichols E, Steiner TJ, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Al-Raddadi RM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(11):954–976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3.
    1. Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Özge A, et al. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. The Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1485–1495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7.
    1. Wijeratne T, Tang HM, Crewther D, Crewther S. Prevalence of migraine in the elderly: a narrated review. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(1–2):104–110. doi: 10.1159/000494758.
    1. Haan J, Hollander J, Ferrari MD. Migraine in the elderly: a review. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(2):97–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01250.x.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine—current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):257–270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010917.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Sprenger T. Current practice and future directions in the prevention and acute management of migraine. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(3):285–298. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70005-3.
    1. Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Gillard P, Hansen RN, Devine EB. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(6):478–488. doi: 10.1177/0333102414547138.
    1. Charles A. Migraine: a brain state. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26(3):235–239. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32836085f4.
    1. Markham A. Erenumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78(11):1157–1161. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0944-0.
    1. Shi L, Lehto SG, Zhu DX, Sun H, Zhang J, Smith BP, et al. Pharmacologic characterization of AMG 334, a potent and selective human monoclonal antibody against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016;356(1):223–231. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.227793.
    1. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V, et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1026–1037. doi: 10.1177/0333102418759786.
    1. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. The Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280–2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0.
    1. Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S, et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2017;16(6):425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2.
    1. Wang S-J, Roxas AA, Jr, Saravia B, Kim B-K, Chowdhury D, Riachi N, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine in patients from Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America: The EMPOwER study. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(13):1285–1297. doi: 10.1177/03331024211024160.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2123–2132. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848.
    1. Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW, Xue F, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: Results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1111/ene.14715.
    1. Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, et al. Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology. 2020;94(5):e497–e510. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008743.
    1. Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, et al. Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(14):1798–1808. doi: 10.1177/0333102419888222.
    1. Ich C. ICH Topic E 9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. London: EMEA (European Medicines Agengy); 2006.
    1. AIMOVIG injection fsu . US Prescribing Information. 2018.
    1. Kaniecki RG, Levin AD. Headache in the elderly. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:511–528. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00028-5.
    1. McLean AJ, Le Couteur DG. Aging biology and geriatric clinical pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(2):163–184. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.2.4.
    1. Togha M, Karimitafti MJ, Ghorbani Z, Farham F, Naderi-Behdani F, Nasergivehchi S, et al. Characteristics and comorbidities of headache in patients over 50 years of age: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03027-1.
    1. Russell FA, King R, Smillie SJ, Kodji X, Brain SD. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(4):1099–1142. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2013.
    1. Sessa M, Andersen M. New Insight on the Safety of Erenumab: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports of Adverse Events Recorded in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database. BioDrugs. 2021;35(2):215–227. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00469-8.
    1. AimovigTM (INN-erenumab) European Medicines Agency. Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: . Accessed Aug 2022
    1. Liang D, Sessa M (2022) Post-marketing safety surveillance of erenumab: new insight from Eudravigilance. Expert Opin Drug Saf 1–6. 10.1080/14740338.2022.2049231. Epub ahead of print
    1. Perino J, Corand V, Laurent E, Theophile H, Miremont-Salame G, Pariente A, et al. Myocardial infarction associated with erenumab: A case report. Pharmacotherapy. 2022;42(7):585–589. doi: 10.1002/phar.2706.
    1. Smith TR, Spierings EL, Cady R, Hirman J, Schaeffler B, Shen V, et al. Safety and tolerability of eptinezumab in patients with migraine: a pooled analysis of 5 clinical trials. J Headache Pain. 2021;22(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01213-3.
    1. Silberstein SD, McAllister P, Ning X, Faulhaber N, Lang N, Yeung P, et al. Safety and tolerability of fremanezumab for the prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of phases 2b and 3 clinical trials. Headache: J Head and Face Pain. 2019;59(6):880–90. doi: 10.1111/head.13534.
    1. Nahas SJ, Naegel S, Cohen JM, Ning X, Janka L, Campos VR, et al. Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in clinical trial participants aged >/=60 years with episodic or chronic migraine: pooled results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. J Headache Pain. 2021;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01351-2.
    1. Reuter U, Lucas C, Dolezil D, Hand AL, Port MD, Nichols RM, et al. Galcanezumab in Patients with Multiple Previous Migraine Preventive Medication Category Failures: Results from the Open-Label Period of the CONQUER Trial. Adv Ther. 2021;38(11):5465–5483. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01911-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel