The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions

Alberto Betella, Paul F M J Verschure, Alberto Betella, Paul F M J Verschure

Abstract

Self-assessment methods are broadly employed in emotion research for the collection of subjective affective ratings. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a pictorial scale developed in the eighties for the measurement of pleasure, arousal, and dominance, is still among the most popular self-reporting tools, despite having been conceived upon design principles which are today obsolete. By leveraging on state-of-the-art user interfaces and metacommunicative pictorial representations, we developed the Affective Slider (AS), a digital self-reporting tool composed of two slider controls for the quick assessment of pleasure and arousal. To empirically validate the AS, we conducted a systematic comparison between AS and SAM in a task involving the emotional assessment of a series of images taken from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), a database composed of pictures representing a wide range of semantic categories often used as a benchmark in psychological studies. Our results show that the AS is equivalent to SAM in the self-assessment of pleasure and arousal, with two added advantages: the AS does not require written instructions and it can be easily reproduced in latest-generation digital devices, including smartphones and tablets. Moreover, we compared new and normative IAPS ratings and found a general drop in reported arousal of pictorial stimuli. Not only do our results demonstrate that legacy scales for the self-report of affect can be replaced with new measurement tools developed in accordance to modern design principles, but also that standardized sets of stimuli which are widely adopted in research on human emotion are not as effective as they were in the past due to a general desensitization towards highly arousing content.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), adapted…
Fig 1. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), adapted with permission from Bradley and Lang 1994 [6].
SAM is a pictorial tool designed in the eighties that measures pleasure (top), arousal (middle) and dominance (bottom) on a discrete scale. It is available in two main versions: paper-and-pencil (5-, 7-, 9-points) and computer program (20-points). Participants can rate their affective state by placing an X over or between any figure.
Fig 2. The “Affective Slider” (AS) is…
Fig 2. The “Affective Slider” (AS) is a digital self-reporting tool composed of two sliders that measure arousal (top) and pleasure (bottom) on a continuous scale.
The AS does not require written instructions and it is intentionally displayed using a neutral chromatic palette to avoid bias in ratings due to the emotional connotation of colors. See text for more details.
Fig 3. Screenshot of the web-based questionnaire…
Fig 3. Screenshot of the web-based questionnaire showing a single experimental trial using the AS.
The picture (in this example just a placeholder and not part of the IAPS collection) is randomly displayed either on the left or on the right side of the screen. Similarly, the order of the pleasure and arousal dimensions is randomized.
Fig 4. Scatterplots representing the linear correlation…
Fig 4. Scatterplots representing the linear correlation between AS and SAM pleasure (rs = .852) and arousal (rs = .860).
The red line indicates the best fit.

References

    1. Darwin C. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals Phoenix Books. University of Chicago Press; 1965.
    1. James W. What is an Emotion? Mind. 1884;9(34):pp. 188–205. 10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188
    1. Picard RW, Healey J. Affective wearables. Personal Technologies. 1997;1(4):231–240. 10.1007/BF01682026
    1. Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M, Pawlik K, Perrez M. Ambulatory Assessment—Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2007. January;23(4):206–213. 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
    1. Betella A, Zucca R, Cetnarski R, Greco A, Lanatà A, Mazzei D, et al. Inference of Human Affective States from Psychophysiological Measurements Extracted under Ecologically Valid Conditions. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2014;8(286). 10.3389/fnins.2014.00286
    1. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1994. March;25(1):49–59. 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
    1. MacKenzie IS. Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective. Elsevier Science; 2012.
    1. Ringeval F, Sonderegger A, Sauer J, Lalanne D. Introducing the RECOLA multimodal corpus of remote collaborative and affective interactions. 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG). 2013 Apr;p. 1–8.
    1. Lottridge D, Chignell M. Emotional bandwidth: information theory analysis of affective response ratings using a continuous slider. Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2009. 2009;p. 111–114. 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_12
    1. Laurans G, PMa Desmet, Hekkert P. The emotion slider: A self-report device for the continuous measurement of emotion In: 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Amsterdam: Ieee; 2009.
    1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention; 2008. A-8.
    1. Lang PJ, Greenwald MK, Bradley MM. The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) standardization procedure and initial group results for affective judgments (Tech. Rep. Nos. 1A–1D).Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention; 1988.
    1. Carnagey NL, Anderson CA, Bushman BJ. The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007;43(3):489–496. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.003
    1. Krahé B, Möller I, Huesmann LR, Kirwil L, Felber J, Berger A. Desensitization to media violence: Links with habitual media violence exposure, aggressive cognitions, and aggressive behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2011;100(4):630 10.1037/a0021711
    1. Romer D, Jamieson PE, Bushman BJ, Bleakley A, Wang A, Langleben D, et al. Parental Desensitization to Violence and Sex in Movies. Pediatrics. 2014;.
    1. Libkuman TM, Otani H, Kern R, Viger SG, Novak N. Multidimensional normative ratings for the international affective picture system. Behavior research methods. 2007;39(2):326–334. 10.3758/BF03193164
    1. Grühn D, Scheibe S. Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age? Behavior Research Methods. 2008;40(2):512–521. 10.3758/BRM.40.2.512
    1. Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press; 1974.
    1. Valdez P, Mehrabian A. Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1994;123(4):394–409. 10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.394
    1. Betella A, Inderbitzin M, Bernardet U, Verschure PFMJ. Non-anthropomorphic Expression of Affective States through Parametrized Abstract Motifs. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on; 2013. p. 435–441.
    1. Russell JA, Barrett LF. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999;76(5):805 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805
    1. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention In: Coan JA, Allen JJB, editors. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 29–46.
    1. Krantz JH, Dalal R. Chapter 2—Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research In: Birnbaum MH, editor. Psychological Experiments on the Internet. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 35–60.
    1. Meyerson P, Tryon W. Validating Internet research: A test of the psychometric equivalence of Internet and in-person samples. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2003;35(4):614–620. 10.3758/BF03195541
    1. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6(1):3–5. 10.1177/1745691610393980
    1. Cacioppo J, Tassinary L, Berntson G. Handbook of psychophysiology. 3rd ed Cambridge University Press; 2007.
    1. Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity. 2nd ed Springer; 2012.
    1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 1999.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel