Safety, humoral and cell mediated immune responses to two formulations of an inactivated, split-virion influenza A/H5N1 vaccine in children

Tawee Chotpitayasunondh, Usa Thisyakorn, Chitsanu Pancharoen, Stephanie Pepin, Nolwenn Nougarede, Tawee Chotpitayasunondh, Usa Thisyakorn, Chitsanu Pancharoen, Stephanie Pepin, Nolwenn Nougarede

Abstract

Background: Highly pathogenic influenza A/H5N1 has caused outbreaks in wild birds and poultry in Asia, Africa and Europe. It has also infected people, especially children, causing severe illness and death. Although the virus shows limited ability to transmit between humans, A/H5N1 represents a potential source of the next influenza pandemic. This study assesses the safety and immunogenicity of aluminium hydroxide adjuvanted (Al) and non adjuvanted influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (H5N1) vaccine in children.

Methods and findings: In a Phase II, open, randomised, multicentre trial 180 children aged 6 months to 17 years received two injections, 21 days apart, of vaccine containing either: 30 microg haemagglutinin (HA) with adjuvant (30 microg+Al) or 7.5 microg HA without adjuvant. An additional 60 children aged 6-35 months received two "half dose" injections (ie 15 microg+Al or 3.8 microg). Safety was followed for 21 days after vaccination. Antibody responses were assessed 21 days after each injection and cellular immune responses were explored. Vaccination appeared well tolerated in all age groups. The 30 microg+Al formulation was more immunogenic than 7.5 microg in all age groups: in these two groups 79% and 46% had haemagglutinination inhibition antibody titres > or =32 (1/dil). Among 6-35 month-olds, the full doses were more immunogenic than their half dose equivalents. Vaccination induced a predominantly Th2 response against H5 HA.

Conclusions: This influenza A(H5N1) vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in children and infants, with Al adjuvant providing a clear immunogenic advantage. These results demonstrate that an H5N1 Al-adjuvanted vaccine, previously shown to be immunogenic and safe in adults, can also be used in children, the group most at risk for pandemic influenza.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00491985.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Stephanie Pepin and Nolwenn Nougarede are both employed by the study sponsor, Sanofi Pasteur. All other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1. Haemagglutination inhibition antibody response 21…
Figure 1. Haemagglutination inhibition antibody response 21 days after two injections, 21 days apart of adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine.
Results are presented per age and vaccine formulation group as geometric mean titres (GMT) and the proportion of subjects with titres ≥32.
Figure 2. Levels of IFNγ and IL5…
Figure 2. Levels of IFNγ and IL5 secreted after in vitro re-stimulation with recombinant H5 haemagglutinin by cells obtained before and eight days after two injections, 21 days apart, of adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in groups of children aged 6–35 months.
Symbols represent results from individual samples, bars indicate the median level.

References

    1. WHO, Areas reporting confirmed occurrence of H5N1 avian influenza in poultry and wild birds since 2003, status as of 14.04.2008, (accessed 4th May 2008)
    1. WHO, Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A/(H5N1) reported to WHO, (accessed 4th May 2008)
    1. Poland G. Vaccines against avian influenza–a race against time. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1411–13.
    1. Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, et al. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1). N Engl J Med. 2005;352:333–40.
    1. WHO, The World Health Organization Global Influenza Program Surveillance Network, Evolution of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1515–21.
    1. Congressional Budget Office. A potential influenza pandemic: possible macroeconomic effects and policy issues. 8th December, 2005. (accessed 8th May 2008, at .)
    1. Beigel JH, Farrar J, Han AM, Hayden FG, Hyer R, et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1374–85.
    1. Glass LM, Glass RJ. Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:61.
    1. Wood JM. Selection of influenza vaccine strains and developing pandemic vaccines. Vaccine. 2002;20(suppl 5):B40–44.
    1. Schwartz B, Gellin B. Vaccination strategies for an influenza pandemic. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1210–5.
    1. Stephenson I, Nicholson KG, Wood JM, Zambon MC, Katz JM. Confronting the avian influenza threat: vaccine development for a potential pandemic. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:499–509.
    1. Webby RJ, Webster RG. Are we ready for pandemic influenza? Science. 2003;302:1519–22.
    1. Bresson JL, Perronne C, Launay O, Gerdil C, Saville M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine: phase I randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;367:1657–64.
    1. European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Guideline on dossier structure and content for pandemic influenza vaccine marketing authorisation application (CPMP/VEG/4717/03). European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, 5th April 2004. (accessed 8th May 2008 at )
    1. European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Note for guidance on harmonisation of requirements for influenza vaccines (CPMP/BWP/214/96). European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, 12th March 1996. (accessed 8th May 2008 at )
    1. Meltzer MI, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. The economic impact of pandemic influenza in the United States: priorities for intervention. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:659–71.
    1. World Health Organization. Epidemiology of WHO-confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1) infection Weekly epidemiological record 2006, 81, 249–260. .
    1. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Prevention of Influenza: recommendation for influenza immunisation of children, 2006–2007. Pediatrics. 2007;119:846–851.
    1. Delore V, Salamand C, Marsh G, Arnoux S, Pepin-Covatta S, et al. Long-term Clinical Trial Safety Experience with the Inactivated Split Influenza Vaccine, Vaxigrip®. Vaccine. 2006;24:1586–1592.
    1. Li FC, Choi BC, Sly T, Pak AW. Finding the real case-fatality rate of H5N1 avian influenza. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:555–9.
    1. Bridges CB, Lim W, Hu-Primmer J, Sims L, Fukuda K, et al. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among poultry workers, Hong Kong, 1997–1998. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1005–10.
    1. Zeman AM, Holmes TH, Stamatis S, Tu W, He XS, et al. Humoral and cellular immune responses in children given annual immunization with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:107–15.
    1. He XS, Holmes TH, Mahmood K, Kemble GW, Dekker CL, Arvin AM, Greenberg HB. Phenotypic changes in influenza-specific CD8+ T cells after immunization of children and adults with influenza vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:803–11.
    1. van Riet E, Adegnika AA, Retra K, Vieira R, Tielens AG, et al. Cellular and humoral responses to influenza in gabonese children living in rural and semi-urban areas. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:1671–8.
    1. World Health Organization. Tables on the Clinical trials of pandemic influenza prototype vaccines. Accessed 25 June 2008, at: .
    1. Barrios C, Brawand P, Berney M, Brandt C, Lambert PH, et al. Neonatal and early life immune responses to various forms of vaccine antigens qualitatively differ from adult responses: predominance of a Th2-biased pattern which persists after adult boosting. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26:1489–96.
    1. Delespesse G, Yang LP, Ohshima Y, Demeure C, Shu U, et al. Maturation of human neonatal CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes into Th1/Th2 effectors. Vaccine. 1998;16:1415–9.
    1. Siegrist CA. Neonatal and early life vaccinology. Vaccine. 2001;19:3331–46.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel