Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital

Judy E Kim-Hwang, Alice Hm Chen, Douglas S Bell, David Guzman, Hal F Yee Jr, Margot B Kushel, Judy E Kim-Hwang, Alice Hm Chen, Douglas S Bell, David Guzman, Hal F Yee Jr, Margot B Kushel

Abstract

Background: Poor communication between referring clinicians and specialists may lead to inefficient use of specialist services. San Francisco General Hospital implemented an electronic referral system (eReferral) that facilitates iterative pre-visit communication between referring and specialty clinicians to improve the referral process.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of eReferral (compared with paper-based referrals) on specialty referrals.

Design: The study was based on a visit-based questionnaire appended to new patient charts at randomly selected specialist clinic sessions before and after the implementation of eReferral.

Participants: Specialty clinicians.

Main measures: The questionnaire focused on the self-reported difficulty in identifying referral question, referral appropriateness, need for and avoidability of follow-up visits.

Key results: We collected 505 questionnaires from speciality clinicians. It was difficult to identify the reason for referral in 19.8% of medical and 38.0% of surgical visits using paper-based methods vs. 11.0% and 9.5% of those using eReferral (p-value 0.03 and <0.001). Of those using eReferral, 6.4% and 9.8% of medical and surgical referrals using paper methods vs. 2.6% and 2.1% were deemed not completely appropriate (p-value 0.21 and 0.03). Follow-up was requested for 82.4% and 76.2% of medical and surgical patients with paper-based referrals vs. 90.1% and 58.1% of eReferrals (p-value 0.06 and 0.01). Follow-up was considered avoidable for 32.4% and 44.7% of medical and surgical follow-ups with paper-based methods vs. 27.5% and 13.5% with eReferral (0.41 and <0.001).

Conclusion: Use of technology to promote standardized referral processes and iterative communication between referring clinicians and specialists has the potential to improve communication between primary care providers and specialists and to increase the effectiveness of specialty referrals.

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Chen and Yee note that they have served as independent consultants for public, non-profit organizations interested in implementing the UCSF/SFGH eReferral model. No other authors report any conflicts or financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
eReferral screenshot.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eReferral process.

References

    1. Chen AH, Yee HF., Jr Improving the primary-specialty care interface: getting from here to there. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:1–3.
    1. Kim Y, Chen AH, Keith E, Yee HF, Jr, Kushel MB. Not perfect, but better: primary care providers’ experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(5):614–619. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3.
    1. McPhee SJ, Lo B, Saika GY, Meltzer R. How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants? Arch Intern Med. 1984;144(6):1265–1268. doi: 10.1001/archinte.144.6.1265.
    1. Gandhi TK, Sittig DF, Franklin M, Sussman AJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):626–631. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x.
    1. Wood ML. Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:49–57.
    1. Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(5):403–409. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.5.403.
    1. Navaneethan SD, Aloudat S, Singh S. A systematic review of patient and health system characteristics associated with late referral in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2008;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-9-3.
    1. Forrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian A, von Schrader S, Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(5):499–506.
    1. Stille CJ, McLaughlin TJ, Primack WA, Mazor KM, Wasserman RC. Determinants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1341–1349. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3010.
    1. Rosser JE, Maguire P. Dilemmas in general practice: the care of the cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(3):315–322. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90341-0.
    1. Donohoe MT, Kravitz RL, Wheeler DB, Chandra R, Chen A, Humphries N. Reasons for outpatient referrals from generalists to specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(5):281–286. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00324.x.
    1. Levin A. Consequences of late referral on patient outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15(Suppl 3):8–13.
    1. Olivotto IA, Gomi A, Bancej C, et al. Influence of delay to diagnosis on prognostic indicators of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94(8):2143–2150. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10453.
    1. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(6):w496–507. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496.
    1. Leu MG, Cheung M, Webster TR, et al. Centers speak up: the clinical context for health information technology in the ambulatory care setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):372–378. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0488-6.
    1. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2526–2534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020847.
    1. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507–512. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507.
    1. Bergus GR, Emerson M, Reed DA, Attaluri A. Email teleconsultations: well formulated clinical referrals reduce the need for clinic consultation. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(1):33–38. doi: 10.1258/135763306775321434.
    1. Smith SM, Allwright S, O’Dowd T. Does sharing care across the primary-specialty interface improve outcomes in chronic disease? A systematic review. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(4):213–224.
    1. Wegner SE, Lathren CR, Humble CG, Mayer ML, Feaganes J, Stiles AD. A medical home for children with insulin-dependent diabetes: comanagement by primary and subspecialty physicians-convergence and divergence of opinions. Pediatrics. 2008;122(2):e383–387. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3761.
    1. Stille CJ, Jerant A, Bell D, Meltzer D, Elmore JG. Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(8):700–708.
    1. Pizzi LT, Suh DC, Barone J, Nash DB. Factors related to physicians’ adoption of electronic prescribing: results from a national survey. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(1):22–32. doi: 10.1177/1062860604273775.
    1. Crosson JC, Isaacson N, Lancaster D, et al. Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among twelve ambulatory practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):364–371. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0494-8.
    1. Palm JM, Colombet I, Sicotte C, Degoulet P. Determinants of user satisfaction with a Clinical Information System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;614–618.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel