PREventive Care Infrastructure based On Ubiquitous Sensing (PRECIOUS): A Study Protocol

Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Jordi Moreno, Andrea Ciudin, Gemma Parramón, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios, Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Jordi Moreno, Andrea Ciudin, Gemma Parramón, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios

Abstract

Background: mHealth has experienced a huge growth during the last decade. It has been presented as a new and promising pathway to increase self-management of health and chronic conditions in several populations. One of the most prolific areas of mHealth has been healthy lifestyles promotion. However, few mobile apps have succeeded in engaging people and ensuring sustained use.

Objective: This paper describes the pilot test protocol of the PReventive Care Infrastructure based on Ubiquitous Sensing (PRECIOUS) project, aimed at validating the PRECIOUS system with end users. This system includes, within a motivational framework, the Bodyguard2 sensor (accelerometer with heart rate monitoring) and the PRECIOUS app.

Methods: This is a pilot experimental study targeting morbidly obese prediabetic patients who will be randomized to three conditions: (1) Group 1 - Control group (Treatment as usual with the endocrinologist and the nurse + Bodyguard2), (2) Group 2 - PRECIOUS system (Bodyguard2 + PRECIOUS app), and (3) Group 3 - PRECIOUS system (Bodyguard2 + PRECIOUS app + Motivational Interviewing). The duration of the study will be 3 months with scheduled follow-up appointments within the scope of the project at Weeks 3, 5, 8, and 12. During the study, several measures related to healthy lifestyles, weight management, and health-related quality of life will be collected to explore the effectiveness of PRECIOUS to foster behavior change, as well as user acceptance, usability, and satisfaction with the solution.

Results: Because of the encouraging results shown in similar scientific work analyzing health apps acceptance in clinical settings, we expect patients to widely accept and express satisfaction with PRECIOUS. We also expect to find acceptable usability of the preventive health solution. The recruitment of the pilot study has concluded with the inclusion of 31 morbidly obese prediabetic patients. Results are expected to be available in mid-2017.

Conclusions: Adopting and maintaining healthy habits may be challenging in people with chronic conditions who usually need regular support to ensure mid/long-term adherence to recommendations and behavior change. Thus, mHealth could become a powerful and efficient tool since it allows continuous communication with users and immediate feedback. The PRECIOUS system is an innovative preventive health care solution aimed at enhancing inner motivation from users to change their lifestyles and adopt healthier habits. PRECIOUS includes ubiquitous sensors and a scientifically grounded app to address three main components of health: physical activity, diet, and stress levels.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02818790; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02818790 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qfzdfMoU).

Keywords: adherence; diet; mHealth; motivational interviewing; physical activity; sustained motivation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Jordi Moreno, Andrea Ciudin, Gemma Parramón, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.05.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshots of PRECIOUS app: a) home screen, b) physical activity app, c) dietary app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of sessions during the pilot test and the measures assessed in each one.

References

    1. European Commission eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020: Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. [2017-05-24]. .
    1. European Commission An assessment report for the European Union. [2017-05-24]. Socio-economic impact of mHealth .
    1. World Health Organization Preventing chronic diseases: A vital investment. [2017-05-24]. .
    1. Mathers C, Loncar D. Evidence and Information for Policy Working Paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; [2017-05-24]. Updated projections of global mortality and burden of disease, 2002-2030: Data sources, methods and results .
    1. Jahan S, Mozammel Hoque Chowdhury M. mHealth: A Sustainable Healthcare Model for Developing World. AJMO. 2014 Jan 17;2(3):73–76. doi: 10.12691/ajmo-2-3-2.
    1. Berrouiguet S, Baca-García E, Brandt S, Walter M, Courtet P. Fundamentals for Future Mobile-Health (mHealth): A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone and Web-Based Text Messaging in Mental Health. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 10;18(6):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5066.
    1. McMillan KA, Kirk A, Hewitt A, MacRury S. A Systematic and Integrated Review of Mobile-Based Technology to Promote Active Lifestyles in People With Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):299–307. doi: 10.1177/1932296816656018.
    1. Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, Riley WT, Shar A, Spring B, Spruijt-Metz D, Hedeker D, Honavar V, Kravitz R, Lefebvre RC, Mohr DC, Murphy SA, Quinn C, Shusterman V, Swendeman D. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017.
    1. Bardus M, van Beurden SB, Smith JR, Abraham C. A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0359-9.
    1. Chen J, Cade J, Allman-Farinelli M. The Most Popular Smartphone Apps for Weight Loss: A Quality Assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4334.
    1. Wang Q, Egelandsdal B, Amdam GV, Almli VL, Oostindjer M. Diet and Physical Activity Apps: Perceived Effectiveness by App Users. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(2):e33. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5114.
    1. Middelweerd A, Mollee JS, van der Wal CN, Brug J, Te Velde Saskia SJ. Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:97. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0097-9.
    1. Miller W, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing. New York: Guildford Press; 2013.
    1. Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke Bl, Butters R, Tollefson D, Butler C, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):a. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9527-4.
    1. Dallinga JM, Mennes M, Alpay L, Bijwaard H, Baart de la Faille-Deutekom M. App use, physical activity and healthy lifestyle: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug;15:833. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2165-8.
    1. Brooke J. SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, editors. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.
    1. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of SIGCHI '88; SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 1988; New York. ACM/SIGCHI; 1988. pp. 213–218.
    1. Alonso J. Instituto municipal de investigación médica (IMIM-IMAS) 2002. [2017-05-24]. Adaptación de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-12 .
    1. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220–233.
    1. Andrés A, Saldaña C, Gómez-Benito J. Establishing the stages and processes of change for weight loss by consensus of experts. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009 Sep;17(9):1717–1723. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.100. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.100.
    1. Andrés A, Saldaña C, Gómez-Benito J. The transtheoretical model in weight management: validation of the processes of change questionnaire. Obes Facts. 2011;4(6):433–442. doi: 10.1159/000335135.
    1. Prochaska J, Diclemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–1104.
    1. Bados A, Solanas A, Andres R. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of depression, anxiety and stress scales (DASS) Psicothema. 2005;17(4):679–683.
    1. Contel M, Gual A, Colom J. Test para la identificación de trastornos por uso de alcohol (AUDIT): Traducción y validación del AUDIT al catalán y castellano. Adicciones. 1999;11(4):337–347.
    1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791–804.
    1. Becoña E, Gómez-Durán B, Alvarez-Soto E, García MP. Scores of Spanish smokers on Fagerström's Tolerance Questionnaire. Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 2):1227–1233. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1227.
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119–1127.
    1. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193–213.
    1. Macías FJ, Royuela RA. La versión española del Índice de calidad de sueño de Pittsburgh. Informaciones Psiquiátricas. 1996;146:465–472.
    1. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582–592. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
    1. Kieser M, Wassmer G. On the Use of the Upper Confidence Limit for the Variance from a Pilot Sample for Sample Size Determination. Biom J. 1996;38(8):941–949. doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710380806.
    1. Fiordelli M, Diviani N, Schulz PJ. Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):21–25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2430.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583.
    1. Essany M. MHealth watch. 2013. [2017-05-24]. Mobile health care apps growing fast in number
    1. Hampton T. Recent advances in mobile technology benefit global health, research, and care. JAMA. 2012 May 16;307(19):2013–2014. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.4465.
    1. Shyam SS, Saraswathi B, Haiyan J. A theoretical framework for designing preventive health applications. In: Magnus B, Ragnellmalm E, editors. Persuasive technology. Design for health and safety. Sweden: Linköping; 2012. pp. 112–122.
    1. Okumus B, Bilgihan A, Ozturk A. Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Smartphone Diet Applications. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2015 Nov 03;25(6):726–747. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2016.1082454.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel