A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions

Joris J Harlaar, Eva B Deerenberg, Gabrielle H van Ramshorst, Harold E Lont, Ed C M H van der Borst, Willem R Schouten, Joos Heisterkamp, Helena C van Doorn, Huib A Cense, Frits Berends, Hein B A C Stockmann, Wietske W Vrijland, Esther C J Consten, Reyer T Ottow, Peter M N Y H Go, John J Hermans, Ewout W Steyerberg, Johan F Lange, Joris J Harlaar, Eva B Deerenberg, Gabrielle H van Ramshorst, Harold E Lont, Ed C M H van der Borst, Willem R Schouten, Joos Heisterkamp, Helena C van Doorn, Huib A Cense, Frits Berends, Hein B A C Stockmann, Wietske W Vrijland, Esther C J Consten, Reyer T Ottow, Peter M N Y H Go, John J Hermans, Ewout W Steyerberg, Johan F Lange

Abstract

Background: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure.

Methods/design: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure.

Conclusion: The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01132209.

References

    1. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, Turnage RH. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):95–100. doi: 10.1007/s002689910018. discussion 101.
    1. Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ. Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(1):29–31.
    1. Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Kohler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(5):361–367.
    1. Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg. 1989;124(4):485–488.
    1. van 't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350–1356. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x.
    1. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years] Einflussfaktoren der Narbenhernienentstehung. Retrospektive Untersuchung an 2.983 laparotomierten Patienten uber einen Zeitraum von 10 Jahren. Chirurg. 2002;73(5):474–480. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0425-5.
    1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(3):175–180.
    1. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Reines HD, DeMaria EJ, Newsome HH, Lowry JW. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg. 1996;171(1):80–84. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80078-6.
    1. Adye B, Luna G. Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery. Am J Surg. 1998;175(5):400–402.
    1. Stevick CA, Long JB, Jamasbi B, Nash M. Ventral hernia following abdominal aortic reconstruction. Am Surg. 1988;54(5):287–289.
    1. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Buchler MW, Knaebel HP. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ) Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576–582. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.
    1. Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005;62(2):220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.014.
    1. Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998;176(6):666–670. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00277-3.
    1. Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L. Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg. 2001;67(5):421–426.
    1. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738–741. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740831.
    1. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):436–442. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200003000-00018.
    1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1284–1286. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801020.
    1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(2):125–129.
    1. Jenkins TP. The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg. 1976;63(11):873–876. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800631110.
    1. Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations. Am J Surg. 1981;141(4):510–513. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90150-1.
    1. Sanders RJ, DiClementi D. Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence. Arch Surg. 1977;112(10):1188–1191.
    1. Adamsons RJ, Musco F, Enquist IF. The chemical dimensions of a healing incision. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;123(3):515–521.
    1. Campbell JA, Temple WJ, Frank CB, Huchcroft SA. A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba. Surgery. 1989;106(5):888–892.
    1. Carlson MA. Acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):607–636. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70571-5.
    1. Ellis H, Bucknall TE, Cox PJ. Abdominal incisions and their closure. Curr Probl Surg. 1985;22(4):1–51.
    1. Hogstrom H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Suture technique and early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses and laparotomy wounds. Acta Chir Scand. 1985;151(5):441–443.
    1. Rodeheaver GT, Nesbit WS, Edlich RF. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure. Ann Surg. 1986;204(2):193–199. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198608000-00015.
    1. Tera H, Aberg C. Tissue strength of structures involved in musculo-aponeurotic layer sutures in laparotomy incisions. Acta Chir Scand. 1976;142(5):349–355.
    1. Pollock AV, Evans M. Early prediction of late incisional hernias. Br J Surg. 1989;76(9):953–954. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760926.
    1. Pollock AV, Greenall MJ, Evans M. Single-layer mass closure of major laparotomies by continuous suturing. J R Soc Med. 1979;72(12):889–893.
    1. Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LA. Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(1):60–63. doi: 10.1080/110241501750069846.
    1. Harlaar JJ, van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Brinke JG, Hop WC, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Lange JF. Small stitches with small suture distances increase laparotomy closure strength. Am J Surg. 2009.
    1. Cengiz Y, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA. Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):272–275. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.3.272.
    1. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056–1059. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.
    1. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E. et al.Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):250–78. doi: 10.1086/501620. quiz 79-80.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel