Short-Term Event Prediction in the Operating Room (STEP-OP) of Five-Minute Intraoperative Hypotension Using Hybrid Deep Learning: Retrospective Observational Study and Model Development

Sooho Choe, Eunjeong Park, Wooseok Shin, Bonah Koo, Dongjin Shin, Chulwoo Jung, Hyungchul Lee, Jeongmin Kim, Sooho Choe, Eunjeong Park, Wooseok Shin, Bonah Koo, Dongjin Shin, Chulwoo Jung, Hyungchul Lee, Jeongmin Kim

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative hypotension has an adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. However, it is difficult to predict and treat intraoperative hypotension in advance according to individual clinical parameters.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model to forecast 5-minute intraoperative hypotension based on the weighted average ensemble of individual neural networks, utilizing the biosignals recorded during noncardiac surgery.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, arterial waveforms were recorded during noncardiac operations performed between August 2016 and December 2019, at Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. We analyzed the arterial waveforms from the big data in the VitalDB repository of electronic health records. We defined 2s hypotension as the moving average of arterial pressure under 65 mmHg for 2 seconds, and intraoperative hypotensive events were defined when the 2s hypotension lasted for at least 60 seconds. We developed an artificial intelligence-enabled process, named short-term event prediction in the operating room (STEP-OP), for predicting short-term intraoperative hypotension.

Results: The study was performed on 18,813 subjects undergoing noncardiac surgeries. Deep-learning algorithms (convolutional neural network [CNN] and recurrent neural network [RNN]) using raw waveforms as input showed greater area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) scores (0.698, 95% CI 0.690-0.705 and 0.706, 95% CI 0.698-0.715, respectively) than that of the logistic regression algorithm (0.673, 95% CI 0.665-0.682). STEP-OP performed better and had greater AUPRC values than those of the RNN and CNN algorithms (0.716, 95% CI 0.708-0.723).

Conclusions: We developed STEP-OP as a weighted average of deep-learning models. STEP-OP predicts intraoperative hypotension more accurately than the CNN, RNN, and logistic regression models.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02914444; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02914444.

Keywords: arterial pressure; artificial intelligence; biosignals; deep learning; hypotension; machine learning.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Sooho Choe, Eunjeong Park, Wooseok Shin, Bonah Koo, Dongjin Shin, Chulwoo Jung, Hyungchul Lee, Jeongmin Kim. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 30.09.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process flow and criteria of short-term event prediction in the operating room (STEP-OP) for constructing the prediction model of intraoperative hypotension using VitalDB. CNN: convolutional neural network; RNN: recurrent neural network; NaN: missing values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram with flow of data construction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Short-term event prediction in the operating room (STEP-OP) model construction. K×F denotes the kernel size and number of filters. ReLU activation was used after each convolution layer, and the sigmoid was used for the final activation. Normalization, pooling, and dropout layers are omitted in the figure. LSTM: long short-term memory; FC: fully connected layer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Optimal weight value α on 10% of the training set. (B) Precision-recall curve of developed models. AUPRC: area under the precision-recall curve; CNN: convolutional neural network; RNN: recurrent neural network; STEP-OP: short-term event prediction in the operating room.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of a patient record depicting the arterial pressure and STEP-OP prediction values over time. Arterial pressure denotes the 2-second moving average of the arterial pressure. STEP-OP: short-term event prediction in the operating room.

References

    1. An R, Pang Q, Liu H. Association of intra-operative hypotension with acute kidney injury, myocardial injury and mortality in non-cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;73(10):e13394. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13394.
    1. Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, Cywinski J, Thabane L, Sessler DI. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507–515. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.
    1. Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47–65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432.
    1. Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663–674. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300.
    1. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J. Supervised machine-learning predictive analytics for prediction of postinduction hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):675–688. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002374.
    1. Lee S, Lee H, Chu YS, Song SW, Ahn GJ, Lee H, Yang S, Koh SB. Deep learning models for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4):808–817. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.035.S0007-0912(21)00002-7
    1. Moon Y, Moon HS, Kim D, Kim J, Lee J, Shim W, Kim S, Hwang G, Choi J. Deep learning-based stroke volume estimation outperforms conventional arterial contour method in patients with hemodynamic instability. J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 09;8(9):1419. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091419. jcm8091419
    1. Kim J, Chae M, Chang H, Kim Y, Park E. Predicting cardiac arrest and respiratory failure using feasible artificial intelligence with simple trajectories of patient data. J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 29;8(9):1336. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091336. jcm8091336
    1. Kwon J, Lee Y, Lee Y, Lee S, Park J. An algorithm based on deep learning for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 26;7(13):e008678. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008678. JAHA.118.008678
    1. Ismail Fawaz H, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller P. Deep learning for time series classification: a review. Data Min Knowl Disc. 2019 Mar 2;33(4):917–963. doi: 10.1007/s10618-019-00619-1.
    1. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.nature14539
    1. Sarajlic P, Plunde O, Franco-Cereceda A, Bäck M. Artificial intelligence models reveal sex-specific gene expression in aortic valve calcification. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 May;6(5):403–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.02.005. S2452-302X(21)00065-6
    1. Hung C, Chen W, Lai P, Lin C, Lee C. Comparing deep neural network and other machine learning algorithms for stroke prediction in a large-scale population-based electronic medical claims database. 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); July 11-15, 2017; Jeju Island, Korea. 2017. Jul, pp. 3110–3113.
    1. VitalDB. [2021-09-12]. .
    1. Lee H, Jung C. Vital Recorder-a free research tool for automatic recording of high-resolution time-synchronised physiological data from multiple anaesthesia devices. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 24;8(1):1527. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20062-4.10.1038/s41598-018-20062-4
    1. Hashem S, Schmeiser B. Improving model accuracy using optimal linear combinations of trained neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1995;6(3):792–794. doi: 10.1109/72.377990.
    1. Deng Li, Platt JC. Ensemble deep learning for speech recognition. Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association; September 14-18, 2014; Singapore. 2014. Sep, pp. 1915–1919.
    1. Minaee S, Azimi E, Abdolrashidi A. Deep-Sentiment: sentiment analysis using ensemble of CNN and Bi-LSTM models. arXiv. 2019. Apr, [2021-09-08]. .
    1. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; December 8-14, 2019; Vancouver, Canada. 2019. Dec, pp. 8024–8035.
    1. Abraham A, Pedregosa F, Eickenberg M, Gervais P, Mueller A, Kossaifi J, Gramfort A, Thirion B, Varoquaux G. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00014.
    1. Saito T, Rehmsmeier M. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432. PONE-D-14-26790
    1. Jeni LA, Cohn JF, De La Torre F. Facing imbalanced data - recommendations for the use of performance metrics. Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction; September 2-5, 2013; Geneva, Switzerland. 2013. Sep, pp. 245–251.
    1. Dinov ID. Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data. Gigascience. 2016;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13742-016-0117-6. 117
    1. Davies SJ, Vistisen ST, Jian Z, Hatib F, Scheeren TWL. Ability of an arterial waveform analysis-derived hypotension prediction index to predict future hypotensive events in surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):352–359. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004121.
    1. Lee J, Woo J, Kang AR, Jeong Y, Jung W, Lee M, Kim SH. Comparative analysis on machine learning and deep learning to predict post-induction hypotension. Sensors (Basel) 2020 Aug 14;20(16):4575. doi: 10.3390/s20164575. s20164575

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel