A manual-based vocational rehabilitation program for patients with an acquired brain injury: study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Louise K Hoeffding, Maria Haahr Nielsen, Morten A Rasmussen, Anne Norup, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Ulrikka K Kjær, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Kirsten Jensen Quas, Trine Schow, Louise K Hoeffding, Maria Haahr Nielsen, Morten A Rasmussen, Anne Norup, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Ulrikka K Kjær, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Kirsten Jensen Quas, Trine Schow

Abstract

Background: An acquired brain injury (ABI) is a complex injury often followed by a broad range of cognitive, physical, emotional, and behavioral disabilities. Because of these disabilities, vocational rehabilitation (VR) is a challenging task, however, of great importance, since approximately 75% of the patients with ABI are of working age. Thus, standardized clinically effective and cost-effective methodologies regarding VR for patients with ABI are highly needed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an individually targeted manual-based VR for patient with ABI compared to conventional VR (usual care).

Methods: This study is an interventional, two-arm, six-month follow-up, cluster randomized controlled trial involving four municipalities in the Zealand Region and the Capital Region of Denmark. A total of 84 patients with ABI evenly distributed across four municipalities will be included in the study. The patients will randomly be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the VR intervention provided by a specialized Brain Injury Centre or the conventional VR provided by the municipalities (usual care). The six- to nine-month intervention will consist of individual and group therapies as well as a work placement program including supported employment. Furthermore, the intervention will include a family intervention program followed up by support to one individual family caregiver. The primary outcomes are increased work or study rate at six-month follow-up. Moreover, a budget impact analysis and possibly a cost-utility analysis of the intervention will be performed.

Discussion: This study consists of a comprehensive multidiciplinary VR intervention involving several parties such as the municipalities, a specialized rehabilitation team, and patients' own family caregivers. If this intervention is proven successful when compared to the conventional VR, it will provide evidence for a manual-based individualized holistic approach in returning to work after an ABI. Furthermore, the study will contribute with novel knowledge regarding feasibility and clinical effectiveness of the VR intervention relevant to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03086031 . Registered on 21 March 2017.

Keywords: Caregiver intervention; Randomized controlled trials; Return to work; Study protocol; Traumatic brain injury; Vocational rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been reported to the Danish Data Protection Agency (registration no. 2016-41-4950). The Regional Ethical Committee of Region Zealand, Denmark, has stated that the study does not need their approval (komitélovens §§1 and 2). The study will be carried out according to the local legal and regulatory requirements and data will be handled according to the guidelines given by the Danish Personal Data Protection Agency.

All participants must give written and oral informed consent to participate in the study, including their consent to publish the results. If any participants are aged under 18 years, they will provide a verbal acceptance while their parents will complete the written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable in this section.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A flow chart of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Content for the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The x-axis depicts the average hours at work/study per week for the conventional VR treatment and the y-axis the average surplus obtained from the VR intervention. The colors indicate the study power at level alpha 0.05 under these expectations for a study with 42 + 42 = 84 participants. The black line indicates the combinations obtaining a power of 0.8

References

    1. Donker-Cools BHPM, Daams JG, Wind H, Frings-Dresen MHW. Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2016;30:113–131. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1090014.
    1. Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:406–418. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9401-1.
    1. Ketchum JM, Almaz Getachew M, Krch D, Baños JH, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Lequerica A, et al. Early predictors of employment outcomes 1 year post traumatic brain injury in a population of Hispanic individuals. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30:13–22.
    1. Trygged S, Ahacic K, Kåreholt I. Income and education as predictors of return to working life among younger stroke patients. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:742. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-742.
    1. Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, Sach T, Walker M, Tyerman A, et al. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Inj. 2013;27:507–520. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.766929.
    1. Foy CML. Long term efficacy of an integrated neurological and vocational rehabilitation programme for young adults with acquired brain injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:533–542. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9488-z.
    1. Saka O, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing. 2009;38:27–32. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn281.
    1. Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1397–1403. doi: 10.1080/09638280701314923.
    1. Wozniak MA, Kittner SJ. Return to work after ischemic stroke: a methodological review. Neuroepidemiology. 2002;21:159–166. doi: 10.1159/000059516.
    1. Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:100–110. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9436-y.
    1. Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:409–417. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.793410.
    1. Glintborg C, Hansen TGB. Bio-psycho-social effects of a coordinated neurorehabilitation programme: a naturalistic mixed methods study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38:99–113. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161301.
    1. Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40:e431–e440. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534487.
    1. Radford KA, Phillips J, Jones T, Gibson A, Sutton C, Watkins C, et al. Facilitating return to work through early specialist health-based interventions (FRESH): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1:24. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0017-z.
    1. Man DWK, Poon WS, Lam C. The effectiveness of artificial intelligent 3-D virtual reality vocational problem-solving training in enhancing employment opportunities for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1016–1025. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.794969.
    1. Murphy L, Chamberlain E, Weir J, Berry A, Nathaniel-James D, Agnew R. Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: preliminary evaluation of a UK specialist rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1119–1129. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664335.
    1. Niemeier JP, DeGrace SM, Farrar LF, Ketchum JS, Berman AJ, Young JA. Effectiveness of a comprehensive, manualized intervention for improving productivity and employability following brain injury. J Vocat Rehabil. 2010;33:167–179.
    1. Ntsiea MV, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, Olorunju SS. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:663–673. doi: 10.1177/0269215514554241.
    1. Salazar AM, Warden DL, Schwab K, Spector J, Braverman S, Walter J, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP) Study Group. JAMA. 2000;283:3075–3081. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.23.3075.
    1. Tyerman A. Vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: models and services. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31:51–62.
    1. Stevens LF, Perrin PB, Hubbard R, Díaz Sosa DM, Espinosa Jove IG, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Using multiple views of family dynamics to predict the mental health of individuals with TBI and their caregivers in Mexico. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33:273–283.
    1. Perrin PB, Stevens LF, Sutter M, Hubbard R, Díaz Sosa DM, Espinosa Jove IG, et al. Exploring the connections between traumatic brain injury caregiver mental health and family dynamics in Mexico City, Mexico. PM R. 2013;5:839–849. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.018.
    1. Nonterah CW, Jensen BJ, Perrin PB, Stevens LF, Cabrera TV, Jiménez-Maldonado M, et al. The influence of TBI impairments on family caregiver mental health in Mexico. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1287–1293. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.812243.
    1. Livingston LA, Kennedy RE, Marwitz JH, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Rapport LJ, Bushnik T, et al. Predictors of family caregivers’ life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury at one and two years post-injury: a longitudinal multi-center investigation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27:73–81.
    1. Leibach GG, Trapp SK, Perrin PB, Everhart RS, Cabrera TV, Jimenez-Maldonado M, et al. Family needs and TBI caregiver mental health in Guadalajara, Mexico. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34:167–175.
    1. Doyle ST, Perrin PB, Díaz Sosa DM, Espinosa Jove IG, Lee GK, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Connecting family needs and TBI caregiver mental health in Mexico City, Mexico. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1441–1449. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.826505.
    1. Perrin PB, Norup A, Caracuel A, Bateman A, Tjørnlund M, Arango-Lasprilla JC. An actor-partner interdependence model of acquired brain injury patient impairments and caregiver psychosocial functioning: a dyadic-report, multinational study. J Clin Psychol. 2016;73:279–293. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22324.
    1. Norup A, Kristensen KS, Poulsen I, Mortensen EL. Evaluating clinically significant changes in health-related quality of life: a sample of relatives of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:196–215. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1076484.
    1. Norup A, Kristensen KS, Poulsen I, Nielsen CL, Mortensen EL. Clinically significant changes in the emotional condition of relatives of patients with severe traumatic brain injury during sub-acute rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:820–826. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1190.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Holmes J, Phillips J, Morris R, Bedekar Y, Tyerman R, Radford K. Development and evaluation of an early specialised traumatic brain injury vocational rehabilitation training package. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:693–702. doi: 10.1177/0308022616651645.
    1. Stevens LF, Lehan T, Durán MAS, Plaza SLO, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Pilot study of a newly developed intervention for families facing serious injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016;22:49–59. doi: 10.1310/sci2201-49.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel