Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies

Héctor Bueno, Amadeo Betriu, Magda Heras, Joaquín J Alonso, Angel Cequier, Eulogio J García, José L López-Sendón, Carlos Macaya, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, TRIANA Investigators, Héctor Bueno, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, Joaquín J Alonso, Amadeo Betriu, Angel Cequier, Eulogio J García, Magda Heras, José L López-Sendón, Carlos Macaya, José Azpitarte, Ginés Sanz, Angel Chamorro, Ramón López-Palop, Alex Sionis, Fernando Arós, Eulogio García-Fernández, Rafael Rubio, Felipe Hernández, Juan Carlos Tascón, José Moreu, Amadeu Betriu, Magda Heras, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, César Morís, Ignacio Sánchez de Posada, Angel Cequier, Enrique Esplugas, Rafael Melgares, Francisco Bosa, Martín Jesús García-González, Román Lezáun, José Ramón Carmona, José Manuel Vázquez, Alfonso Castro-Beiras, Joan García Picart, José Domínguez de Rozas, José Díaz Fernández, Felipe Fernández Vázquez, Norberto Alonso, José Javier Zueco, José María San José, Alberto San Román, Carolina Hernández, José María Hernández García, Angel García Alcántara, Armando Bethencourt, Miquel Fiol, Xabier Mancisidor, Xabier Mancisidor, Rafael Ruiz, Rafael Hidalgo, Nicolás Sobrino, Isidoro González Maqueda, Alfonso Torres, Fernando Arós, Antonio Amaro, Michel Jaquet, Héctor Bueno, Amadeo Betriu, Magda Heras, Joaquín J Alonso, Angel Cequier, Eulogio J García, José L López-Sendón, Carlos Macaya, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, TRIANA Investigators, Héctor Bueno, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, Joaquín J Alonso, Amadeo Betriu, Angel Cequier, Eulogio J García, Magda Heras, José L López-Sendón, Carlos Macaya, José Azpitarte, Ginés Sanz, Angel Chamorro, Ramón López-Palop, Alex Sionis, Fernando Arós, Eulogio García-Fernández, Rafael Rubio, Felipe Hernández, Juan Carlos Tascón, José Moreu, Amadeu Betriu, Magda Heras, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, César Morís, Ignacio Sánchez de Posada, Angel Cequier, Enrique Esplugas, Rafael Melgares, Francisco Bosa, Martín Jesús García-González, Román Lezáun, José Ramón Carmona, José Manuel Vázquez, Alfonso Castro-Beiras, Joan García Picart, José Domínguez de Rozas, José Díaz Fernández, Felipe Fernández Vázquez, Norberto Alonso, José Javier Zueco, José María San José, Alberto San Román, Carolina Hernández, José María Hernández García, Angel García Alcántara, Armando Bethencourt, Miquel Fiol, Xabier Mancisidor, Xabier Mancisidor, Rafael Ruiz, Rafael Hidalgo, Nicolás Sobrino, Isidoro González Maqueda, Alfonso Torres, Fernando Arós, Antonio Amaro, Michel Jaquet

Abstract

Aims: To compare primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and fibrinolysis in very old patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in whom head-to-head comparisons between both strategies are scarce.

Methods and results: Patients ≥75 years old with STEMI <6 h were randomized to pPCI or fibrinolysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, re-infarction, or disabling stroke at 30 days. The trial was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment after enrolling 266 patients (134 allocated to pPCI and 132 to fibrinolysis). Both groups were well balanced in baseline characteristics. Mean age was 81 years. The primary endpoint was reached in 25 patients in the pPCI group (18.9%) and 34 (25.4%) in the fibrinolysis arm [odds ratio (OR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-1.23; P = 0.21]. Similarly, non-significant reductions were found in death (13.6 vs. 17.2%, P = 0.43), re-infarction (5.3 vs. 8.2%, P = 0.35), or disabling stroke (0.8 vs. 3.0%, P = 0.18). Recurrent ischaemia was less common in pPCI-treated patients (0.8 vs. 9.7%, P< 0.001). No differences were found in major bleeds. A pooled analysis with the two previous reperfusion trials performed in older patients showed an advantage of pPCI over fibrinolysis in reducing death, re-infarction, or stroke at 30 days (OR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.91).

Conclusion: Primary PCI seems to be the best reperfusion therapy for STEMI even for the oldest patients. Early contemporary fibrinolytic therapy may be a safe alternative to pPCI in the elderly when this is not available.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00257309.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chart flow of management in patients randomized to the TRIANA study. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
One-year Kaplan–Meier survival curves free of death, re-infarction, or disabling stroke (primary endpoint) (A) or all-cause mortality (B). PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Odds ratio for efficacy of primary angioplasty compared with fibrinolysis according to different pre-defined subgroups. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Odd-ratios for mortality and the combined endpoint in the three randomized trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolysis performed in very old patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

References

    1. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:1417–1422.
    1. Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammill BG, Pasquali SK, Peterson ED. Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2001;286:708–713.
    1. Krumholz HM, Gross CP, Peterson ED, Barron HV, Radford MJ, Parsons LS, Every NR. Is there evidence of implicit exclusion criteria for elderly subjects in randomized trials? Evidence from the GUSTO-1 study. Am Heart J. 2003;146:839–847.
    1. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, Cannon CP, Gibler WB, Rich MW, Van de Werf F, White HD, Weaver WD, Naylor MD, Gore JM, Krumholz HM, Ohman EM. American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115:2570–2589.
    1. de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, vańt Hof AWJ, Hoornethe A, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F on behalf of the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. A randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1723–1728.
    1. Senior PAMI. Primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. . (14 May 2010)
    1. Senior PAMI. Primary PCI not better than lytic therapy in elderly patients. . (14 May 2010)
    1. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, Julian D, Lengyel M, Neumann FJ, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen C, Underwood SR, Vahanian A, Verheugt FW, Wijns W Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology . Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:28–66.
    1. Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, Collins R, Liu LS COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group . Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1607–1621.
    1. Bardají A, Bueno H, Fernández-Ortiz A, Cequier A, Auge JM, Heras M. Características clínicas, tratamiento y evolución del infarto agudo de miocardio en ancianos tratados médicamente. Resultados del registro TRIANA 2. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:351–358.
    1. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:311–322.
    1. White HD. Thrombolytic therapy in the elderly. Lancet. 2000;356:2028–2030.
    1. Thiemann DR, Coresh J, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Oetgen WJ, Powe NR. Lack of benefit for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with myocardial infarction who are older than 75 years. Circulation. 2000;101:2239–2246.
    1. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Ross-Degnan D, Christiansen CL, Gurwitz JH. Effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: cause for concern in the old-old. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:561–568.
    1. Berger AK, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Thrombolytic therapy in older patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:366–374.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel