Social network-based group intervention to promote HIV prevention in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of Game Changers

Glenn J Wagner, Laura M Bogart, Harold D Green, Erik D Storholm, David J Klein, Ryan K McBain, Richard Serunkuuma, Kuraish Mubiru, Joseph K B Matovu, Stephen Okoboi, Glenn J Wagner, Laura M Bogart, Harold D Green, Erik D Storholm, David J Klein, Ryan K McBain, Richard Serunkuuma, Kuraish Mubiru, Joseph K B Matovu, Stephen Okoboi

Abstract

Introduction: Innovative strategies are needed to disseminate HIV prevention messages across communities efficiently, as well as reduce HIV stigma while promoting HIV prevention. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a social network-based group intervention, Game Changers, which trains persons living with HIV (PLWH) to encourage members of their social network to use HIV protective behaviors METHODS: PLWH in HIV care for at least 1 year will be randomly assigned to receive the 8-session group advocacy training intervention or no-intervention control group. Each enrolled PLWH (index participant) will be asked to recruit up to four social network members (alter participant). Assessments will be administered at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18 to both index and alter participants. The primary outcomes are HIV testing and condom use among alter participants; secondary outcomes are engagement in HIV prevention advocacy and internalized HIV stigma among index participants. Repeated-measures multivariable regression analyses will be conducted to compare outcomes between the intervention and control arms, in addition to a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Discussion: This social network-based approach to HIV prevention is particularly timely in the era of biomedical interventions, which require widespread penetration of effective HIV prevention and care messaging into communities. Positioning PLWH as central to the solution for controlling (vs. causing) the HIV epidemic has the potential to reduce HIV stigma and improve prevention outcomes at the individual and network levels.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT05098015. Registered on October 18, 2021.

Keywords: Cluster randomized controlled trial; Group intervention; HIV; Prevention advocacy; Uganda.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework for promotion of HIV prevention advocacy among persons living with HIV to affect HIV protective behaviors among social network members
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. AIDSinfo Database. UNAIDS. 2022. Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. UPHIA. Uganda population-based HIV impact assessment, UPHIA 2016–2017. 2017. . Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. Avert. HIV and AIDS in Uganda 2019. 2019. . Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. Ministry of Health. Preliminary results of the 2020 uganda population HIV impact assessment show progress in controlling the epidemic. Kampala; 2022. . Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. The National Forum of People Living with HIV Networks in Uganda (NAFOPHANU) The People Living with HIV/AIDS Stigma Index, Country Assessment, Uganda. 2013.
    1. Tumwine C, Nannungi A, Ssegujja E, Nekesa N, Ssali S, Atuyambe L, et al. An exploratory study of HIV-prevention advocacy by persons in HIV care in Uganda. Afr J AIDS Res. 2011;10(4):427–33. 10.2989/16085906.2011.646658.
    1. Tumwine C, Tumwesigye NM, Mugyenyi P, Wagner G. Psychosocial characterization of HIV clients with potential to be change agents for HIV prevention In Uganda. JCRHAP. 2012;1(1):3–11. doi: 10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-12-68.
    1. Green HD, Atuyambe L, Ssali S, Ryan GW, Wagner GJ. Social networks of PLHA in Uganda: Implications for mobilizing PLHA as agents for prevention. Aids Behav. 2011;15(5):992–1002. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9707-y.
    1. Ssali SN, Atuyambe L, Tumwine C, Segujja E, Nekesa N, Nannungi A, et al. Reasons for disclosure of HIV status by people living with HIV/AIDS and in HIV care in Uganda: an exploratory study. Aids Patient Care St. 2010;24(10):675–81. 10.1089/apc.2010.0062.
    1. Raja S, McKirnan D, Glick N. The treatment advocacy program-Sinai: a peer-based HIV prevention intervention for working with African American HIV-infected persons. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(5):S127–SS37. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9226-7.
    1. Bogart LM, Matovu JK, Wagner GJ, Green HD, Storholm ED, Klein DJ, et al. A pilot test of Game Changers, a social network intervention to empower people with HIV to be prevention advocates in Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(9):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02806-4.
    1. Bogart LM, Matovu JK, Wagner GJ, Green HD, Storholm ED, Klein DJ, et al. A pilot test of game changers, a social network intervention to empower people with HIV to be prevention advocates in Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(9):2490–2508. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02806-4.
    1. Hedges LV, Citkowicz M. Estimating effect size when there is clustering in one treatment group. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(4):1295–1308. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0538-z.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. Bmj. 2013;346(jan08 15):e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Valente TW. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Comput Math Organ Theory. 1996;2(2):163–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00240425.
    1. Valente TW. Network interventions. Science. 2012;337(6090):49–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1217330.
    1. Centola D. How behavior spreads: the science of complex contagions: Princeton University Press. 2018.
    1. Pentland A. Social physics: how good ideas spread-the lessons from a new science: Penguin. 2014.
    1. Broadhead RS, Heckathorn DD, Weakliem DL, Anthony DL, Madray H, Mills RJ, et al. Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Rep. 1998;113(Suppl 1):42–57.
    1. Sikkema KJ, Kelly JA, Winett RA, Solomon LJ, Cargill VA, Roffman RA, et al. Outcomes of a randomized community-level HIV prevention intervention for women living in 18 low-income housing developments. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(1):57–63. 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.57.
    1. Kelly JA, Murphy DA, Sikkema KJ, McAuliffe TL, Roffman RA, Solomon LJ, et al. Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. Community HIV Prevention Research Collaborative. Lancet. 1997;350(9090):1500–1505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07439-4.
    1. Young SD, Zhao M, Tieu K, Kwok J, Gill H, Gill N. A social media-based HIV prevention intervention using peer leaders. J Consum Health Internet. 2013;17(4):353–361. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2013.833445.
    1. Mustanski B, Morgan E, D'Aquila R, Birkett M, Janulis P, Newcomb ME. Individual and network factors associated with racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: results from the Radar Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80(1):24–30. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001886.
    1. Kelly JA. Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS Care. 2004;16(2):139–150. doi: 10.1080/09540120410001640986.
    1. Kim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, Hughes DA, O'Malley AJ, Fowler JH, et al. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9989):145–53. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2.
    1. Kegeles SM, Hays RB, Pollack LM, Coates TJ. Mobilizing young gay and bisexual men for HIV prevention: a two-community study. AIDS. 1999;13(13):1753–1762. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199909100-00020.
    1. Maiorana A, Kegeles S, Fernandez P, Salazar X, Caceres C, Sandoval C, et al. Implementation and evaluation of an HIV/STD intervention in Peru. Eval Program Plann. 2007;30(1):82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.004.
    1. Bogart LM, Skinner D, Thurston IB, Toefy Y, Klein DJ, Hu CH, et al. Let's Talk!, A South African worksite-based HIV prevention parenting program. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(5):602–8. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.014.
    1. Kaponda CP, Norr KF, Crittenden KS, Norr JL, McCreary LL, Kachingwe SI, et al. Outcomes of an HIV prevention peer group intervention for rural adults in Malawi. Health Educ Behav. 2011;38(2):159–170. doi: 10.1177/1090198110378588.
    1. Norr KF, Ferrer L, Cianelli R, Crittenden KS, Irarrázabal L, Cabieses B, et al. Peer group intervention for HIV prevention among health workers in Chile. J Assoc Nurs AIDS Care. 2012;23(1):73–86. 10.1016/j.jana.2011.02.001.
    1. Wagner GJ, Wanyenze RK, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Gwokyalya V, Hurley E, Mindry D, et al. “Our Choice” improves use of safer conception methods among HIV serodiscordant couples in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating two implementation approaches. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):1–13. 10.1186/s13012-021-01109-z.
    1. Wagner GJ, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Robinson E, Ngo VK, Glick P, Mukasa B, et al. Effects of depression alleviation on ART adherence and HIV clinic attendance in Uganda, and the mediating roles of self-efficacy and motivation. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(6):1655–64. 10.1007/s10461-016-1500-0.
    1. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Cloete A, Mthembu PP, Mkhonta RN, Ginindza T. Measuring AIDS stigmas in people living with HIV/AIDS: the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale. AIDS Care. 2009;21(1):87–93. doi: 10.1080/09540120802032627.
    1. Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Borgatti SP. Egocentric network analysis: foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. 10.1017/9781316443255.
    1. Kenny DA, Kashy DA. Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis. England: Routledge; 2011. p. 343–78.
    1. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford press; 2006.
    1. Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkely:: University of California Press; 1967.
    1. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT press; 2010.
    1. Turner EL, Prague M, Gallis JA, Li F, Murray DM. Review of recent methodological developments in group-randomized trials: part 2—analysis. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(7):1078–1086. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303707.
    1. Baldwin SA, Bauer DJ, Stice E, Rohde P. Evaluating models for partially clustered designs. Psychol Methods. 2011;16(2):149–165. doi: 10.1037/a0023464.
    1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Campbell MK, Torgerson DJ. Bootstrapping: estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios. QJM. 1999;92(3):177–182. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.3.177.
    1. Gorsky RD. A method to measure the costs of counseling for HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 1996;111(Suppl 1):115.
    1. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Crease A, Parker D. Cost analysis in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel