Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial

Mamitaro Ohtsuki, Yukari Okubo, Mayumi Komine, Shinichi Imafuku, Robert M Day, Peng Chen, Rosemary Petric, Allan Maroli, Osamu Nemoto, Mamitaro Ohtsuki, Yukari Okubo, Mayumi Komine, Shinichi Imafuku, Robert M Day, Peng Chen, Rosemary Petric, Allan Maroli, Osamu Nemoto

Abstract

Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, works intracellularly within immune cells to regulate inflammatory mediators. This phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated efficacy and safety of apremilast among Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In total, 254 patients were randomized to placebo, apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. (apremilast 20) or apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. (apremilast 30) through week 16; thereafter, all placebo patients were re-randomized to apremilast 20 or 30 through week 68. Efficacy assessments included achievement of 75% or more reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI-75; primary) and achievement of static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA; secondary) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (minimal) at week 16. Safety was assessed through week 68. At week 16, PASI-75 response rates were 7.1% (placebo), 23.5% (apremilast 20; P = 0.0032 vs placebo) and 28.2% (apremilast 30; P = 0.0003 vs placebo); sPGA response rates (score of 0 or 1) were 8.8% (placebo), 23.9% (apremilast 20; P = 0.0165 vs placebo) and 29.6% (apremilast 30; P = 0.0020 vs placebo). Responses were maintained with apremilast through week 68. Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0-16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8.3%, 11.8%, 11.8%), diarrhea (1.2%, 8.2%, 9.4%), and abdominal discomfort (1.2%, 1.2%, 7.1%), respectively. Exposure-adjusted incidence of these AEs did not increase with continued apremilast treatment (up to 68 weeks). Apremilast demonstrated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis through 68 weeks that was generally consistent with prior studies.

Keywords: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; apremilast; phosphodiesterase 4; phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor; psoriasis.

© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. ‡Every patient was to enter a 4‐week post‐treatment observational follow‐up phase at the time the patient completed or discontinued the study. §Starting at week 40, all non‐responders (<PASI‐50) had the option of adding topical therapies and/or phototherapy, at the discretion of the investigator. ¶Doses of apremilast were titrated during the first week of administration and at week 16 when placebo patients were switched to apremilast. PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI‐50, ≥50% reduction from baseline in PASI score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition through week 68. ‡An additional five patients (two placebo/apremilast 30 mg b.i.d., one apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. and two apremilast 30 mg b.i.d.) who completed week 40 were not included in “patients who completed the apremilast treatment phase at week 68” because of missing principal investigator signature on the treatment disposition case report form. These patients were discontinued from treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportions of patients who achieved (a) PASI‐75 and (b) PASI‐50 and PASI‐90 at week 16. n/m = number of responders/number of patients in the mITT population; missing data were handled using LOCF methodology. *P = 0.0032 apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. ‡P = 0.0003 apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. §P = 0.0057 apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. vs placebo. ¶P < 0.0001 apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. ׀׀P = 0.0556 apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. #P = 0.0016 apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. LOCF, last observation carried forward; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI‐50, ≥50% reduction from baseline in PASI score; PASI‐75, ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI score; PASI‐90, ≥90% reduction from baseline in PASI score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportions of patients who achieved (a) PASI‐75 and (b) sPGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (minimal) in patients with sPGA score of ≥3 (moderate or greater) at baseline over 68 weeks. n = number of responders in the mITT population; missing data were handled using non‐responder imputation. NRI, non‐responder imputation; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI‐75, ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI score; sPGA, static Physician Global Assessment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Mean percentage change from baseline in PASI score and (b) mean change from baseline in pruritus VAS score (mm) (b) over 68 weeks. Includes patients in the mITT population with sufficient data for evaluation at each time point, with no imputation for missing values; data are as observed. Mean (standard deviation) pruritus VAS scores (mm) at baseline were placebo, 57.1 (26.7); apremilast 20 mg b.i.d., 49.9 (26.6); and apremilast 30 mg b.i.d., 53.1 (28.6). mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; VAS, visual analog scale.

References

    1. Lowes MA, Suarez‐Farinas M, Krueger JG. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol 2014; 32: 227–255.
    1. Kubota K, Kamijima Y, Sato T et al Epidemiology of psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis: a nationwide study using the Japanese national claims database. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (1): e006450.
    1. Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 377–385.
    1. Hsu S, Papp KA, Lebwohl MG et al Consensus guidelines for the management of plaque psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2012; 148: 95–102.
    1. Lebwohl MG, Bachelez H, Barker J et al Patient perspectives in the management of psoriasis: results from the population‐based Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70: 871–881.
    1. Schafer PH, Parton A, Gandhi AK et al Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti‐inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis. Br J Pharmacol 2010; 159: 842–855.
    1. Schafer PH, Parton A, Capone L et al Apremilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor with regulatory effects on innate immunity. Cell Signal 2014; 26: 2016–2029.
    1. Schett G, Sloan VS, Stevens RM, Schafer P. Apremilast: a novel PDE4 inhibitor in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2010; 2: 271–278.
    1. Gottlieb AB, Strober B, Krueger JG et al An open‐label, single‐arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque‐type psoriasis treated with an oral anti‐inflammatory agent, apremilast. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 1529–1538.
    1. Papp K, Cather JC, Rosoph L et al Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 738–746.
    1. Papp K, Reich K, Leonardi CL et al Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM 1]). J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73: 37–49.
    1. Paul C, Cather J, Gooderham M et al Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (ESTEEM 2). Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 1387–1399.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Gomez‐Reino JJ et al Longterm (52‐week) results of a phase III randomized, controlled trial of apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2015; 42: 479–488.
    1. Edwards CJ, Blanco FJ, Crowley J et al Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis and current skin involvement: a phase III, randomised, controlled trial (PALACE 3). Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1065–1073.
    1. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica 1978; 157: 238–244.
    1. Leonardi CL, Powers JL, Matheson RT et al Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2014–2022.
    1. Reich A, Heisig M, Phan NQ et al Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 497–501.
    1. Phan NQ, Blome C, Fritz F et al Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 502–507.
    1. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)–a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19: 210–216.
    1. Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, Salek MS, Finlay AY. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: what do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J Invest Dermatol 2005; 125: 659–664.
    1. Basra MK, Salek MS, Camilleri L, Sturkey R, Finlay AY. Determining the minimal clinically important difference and responsiveness of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): further data. Dermatology 2015; 230: 27–33.
    1. Basra MK, Fenech R, Gatt RM, Salek MS, Finlay AY. The Dermatology Life Quality Index 1994–2007: a comprehensive review of validation data and clinical results. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 997–1035.
    1. Bronsard V, Paul C, Prey S et al What are the best outcome measures for assessing quality of life in plaque type psoriasis? A systematic review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24 (Suppl 2): 17–22.
    1. Ohtsuki M, Terui T, Ozawa A et al Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2013 version). J Dermatol 2013; 40: 683–695.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel