The run-in phase of the prospective WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial demonstrates the feasibility of a study design combining static and dynamic biomarker assessments for individualized therapy in early breast cancer

Ulrike Nitz, Oleg Gluz, Hans H Kreipe, Matthias Christgen, Sherko Kuemmel, Frederick L Baehner, Steven Shak, Bahriye Aktas, Michael Braun, Kerstin Lüdtke-Heckenkamp, Helmut Forstbauer, Eva-Maria Grischke, Benno Nuding, Maren Darsow, Claudia Schumacher, Katja Krauss, Wolfram Malter, Marc Thill, Mathias Warm, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ronald E Kates, Nadia Harbeck, Ulrike Nitz, Oleg Gluz, Hans H Kreipe, Matthias Christgen, Sherko Kuemmel, Frederick L Baehner, Steven Shak, Bahriye Aktas, Michael Braun, Kerstin Lüdtke-Heckenkamp, Helmut Forstbauer, Eva-Maria Grischke, Benno Nuding, Maren Darsow, Claudia Schumacher, Katja Krauss, Wolfram Malter, Marc Thill, Mathias Warm, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ronald E Kates, Nadia Harbeck

Abstract

Background: Endocrine sensitivity, as determined by response of the proliferation marker Ki-67 to short-term preoperative endocrine therapy (ET), is currently not included in adjuvant treatment decisions in hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer (BC).

Methods: The prospective WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial included patients with N0/N1 early BC who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy based on clinical-pathological criteria alone. The trial utilized a genomic assessment [the Recurrence Score (RS)] plus endocrine sensitivity testing to guide treatment. All patients received 3 (±1) weeks of preoperative induction ET. According to protocol, patients with RS 0-11 or RS 12-25 plus endocrine proliferation response (EPR, post-induction Ki-67 ⩽ 10%) were to be spared adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: The ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial run-in phase included 407 patients with baseline RS, of whom 386 (median age: 54 years) had complete data for Ki-67 at both baseline and post-induction. RS distribution: 23.1% RS 0-11, 58.3% RS 12-25, and 18.7% RS 26-100. EPR occurred in 84.3%, 76.0%, and 36.1% of these RS groups, respectively. Differences in EPR proportions (RS 26-100 versus others, RS 0-11 versus others) were significant (both p < 0.001); Ki-67 quotients were higher for RS 26-100 (p = 0.02, Mann-Whitney). In premenopausal women (n = 146, mostly tamoxifen-treated), median quotient of Ki-67 level (post/pre) was significantly higher than in postmenopausal women (n = 222, mostly aromatase-inhibitor treated; 0.67 versus 0.25, p < 0.001). EPR was significantly associated with baseline estrogen-receptor status as determined by immunohistochemistry (p = 0.002) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (p < 0.001). Also, a strong correlation was observed between RS measured pre- and post-ET (RS = 0.7, n = 181).

Conclusions: This phase of the WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial confirms trial design estimates of RS and EPR. It indicates that the ADAPT concept of combining static and dynamic biomarker assessment for individualized therapy decisions in early BC is feasible using the EPR criterion post-induction Ki-67 ⩽ 10%.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT01779206.

Keywords: Ki-67; Recurrence Score; biomarker; breast cancer; endocrine therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: U Nitz has minority non-profit ownership at WSG Study Group; received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Zodiac Pharma; has a consulting/advisory board role at Agendia, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sandoz, Seattle Genetics, received research funding from Lilly (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), provided expert testimony for Genomic Health; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Roche, Genomic Health, Pfizer, Celgene. O Gluz has minority non-profit ownership at WSG Study Group; received honoraria from Genomic Health, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, NanoString Technologies, AstraZeneca; has a consulting/advisory board role at Amgen, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Genomic Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Roche, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo. HH Kreipe received honoraria from Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health; has a consulting/advisory board role at Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Genomic Health, Roche Pharma, Novartis, AstraZeneca. S Kuemmel has minority non-profit ownership at WSG Study Group; has a consulting/advisory board role at Roche, Genomic Health, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Celgene, SOMATEX Medical Technologies, Daiichi Sankyo, pfm medical, Pfizer, MSD, Lilly, Sonoscape; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Sonoscope. FL Baehner was an employee at Genomic Health. S Shak was an employee, had a leadership role, had stock, and PI related to Genomic Health. M Christgen, H Forstbauer, E Grischke, M Darsow, M Warm, and RE Kates declare no conflict of interest. B Aktas received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Novartis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Tesaro Bio Germany, PharmaMar, Eisai; has a consulting/advisory board role at Novartis Pharma, Roche Pharma, Pfizer, Tesaro Bio; and received travel accommodations/expenses from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Roche Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis Pharma, Tesaro Bio Germany, PharmaMar, Eisai. M Braun received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eisai, Genomic Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Medac, Novatis, Pfizer, Roche, RTI Surgical, Teva; has a consulting/advisory board role at AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eisai, Genomic Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Medac, Novatis, Pfizer, Roche, RTI Surgical, Teva; and received travel accommodations/expenses from AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eisai, Genomic Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Medac, Novatis, Pfizer, Roche, RTI Surgical, Teva. K Lüdtke-Heckenkamp has a consulting/advisory board role at Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Celgene; received research funding from Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst); and received travel accommodations/expenses from Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis. B Nuding has a consulting/advisory board role at Roche, Novartis, Pfizer; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Novartis. C Schumacher received research funding from Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Boehringer (Inst); and serves on the Speaker’s bureau of Roche. K Krauss has stock/interest at Fresenius (Fam); received honoraria from Roche, Celgene; received research funding from Novartis, Pfizer; and received travel accommodations/expenses from Medtronic. W Malter received honoraria from Nanostring, Celgene, Roche; and has a consulting/advisory board role at Genomic Health, Pfizer, Novartis, Hologic. M Thill received honoraria from Amgen, Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Clovis, Connect Medica, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Daiichi Sanyko, Gedeon Richter, Hexal, I-Med-Institute, Lilly, MCI, Medtronic, MSD, Novartis, onkowissen.de, Omniamed, Pfizer, pfm Medical, Roche, RTI Surgical; has a consulting/advisory board role at Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biom‘Up, Celgene, ClearCut, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Lilly, MSD, Norgine, Neodynamics, Novartis, onkowissen.de, Pfizer, pfm Medical, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, RTI Surgical, Sysmex, Tesaro; received research funding from Exact Sciences; received travel accommodation/expenses from Amgen, Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Clovis, Connect Medica, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Hexal, I-Med-Institute, Lilly, MCI, Medtronic, MSD, Norgine, Novartis, Omniamed, Pfizer, pfm Medical, Roche, RTI Surgical, Tesaro. R Wuerstlein has a consulting/advisory board role at Agendia, Amgen, Aristo, AstraZeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, Carl Zeiss, Celgene, Clinsol, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Genomic Health, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hexal, Lilly, Medstrom Medical, MSD, Mundipharma, Nanostring, Novartis, Odonate, Paxman, Palleos, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, PumaBiotechnolgogy, Riemser, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro Bio, Teva; received travel accommodation/expenses from Agendia, Amgen, Aristo, AstraZeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, Carl Zeiss, Celgene, Clinsol, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Genomic Health, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hexal, Lilly, Medstrom Medical, MSD, Mundipharma, Nanostring, Novartis, Odonate, Paxman, Palleos, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, PumaBiotechnolgogy, Riemser, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro Bio, Teva; and is on the Speaker’s bureau of Agendia, Amgen, Aristo, AstraZeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, Carl Zeiss, Celgene, Clinsol, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Genomic Health, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hexal, Lilly, Medstrom Medical, MSD, Mundipharma, Nanostring, Novartis, Odonate, Paxman, Palleos, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, PumaBiotechnolgogy, Riemser, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro Bio, Teva. N Harbeck has minority non-profit ownership at WSG Study Group; received honoraria for consulting and/or lectures from Agendia, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genomic Health, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz/Hexal, Seattle Genetics.

© The Author(s), 2020.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2− trial design. Reprinted from Hofmann et al. HR, hormone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2; q1w, weekly; pCR, pathologic complete response; q2w, every second week; RS, Recurrence Score.

References

    1. Viale G, Giobbie-Hurder A, Regan MM, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from Breast International Group Trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5569–5575.
    1. Strasser-Weippl K, Sudan G, Ramjeesingh R, et al. Outcomes in women with invasive ductal or invasive lobular early stage breast cancer treated with anastrozole or exemestane in CCTG (NCIC CTG) MA.27. Eur J Cancer 2018; 90: 19–25.
    1. Bartlett JM, Brookes CL, Robson T, et al. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to endocrine therapy: a prospectively powered pathology study in the tamoxifen and exemestane adjuvant multinational trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1531–1538.
    1. Kim C, Tang G, Pogue-Geile KL, et al. Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4160–4167.
    1. Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR, et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 167–170.
    1. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, et al. Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 6523–6531.
    1. Ellis MJ, Ma C. Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 105 (Suppl. 1): 33–43.
    1. Dowsett M, Smith I, Robertson J, et al. Endocrine therapy, new biologicals, and new study designs for presurgical studies in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011; 2011: 120–123.
    1. Bliss JM, Morden J, Evans A, et al. Clinico-pathological relationships with Ki67 in POETIC (CRUK/07/015) – Critical lessons for assessing Ki67 for prognosis and as a pharmacodynamic marker. Presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 6–10 December 2016, San Antonio, TX.
    1. Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J, et al. Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 1380–1388.
    1. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817–2826.
    1. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3726–3734.
    1. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 111–121.
    1. Hofmann D, Nitz U, Gluz O, et al. WSG ADAPT - adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer: study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized, investigator initiated phase II/III trial. Trials 2013; 14: 261.
    1. AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast cancer, (accessed 24 May 2020).
    1. Francis PA, Pagani O, Fleming GF, et al. Tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 122–137.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel