Gene set enrichment analysis identifies key innate immune pathways in primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

E Cantu, D J Lederer, K Meyer, K Milewski, Y Suzuki, R J Shah, J M Diamond, N J Meyer, J W Tobias, D A Baldwin, V M Van Deerlin, K M Olthoff, A Shaked, J D Christie, CTOT Investigators, E Cantu, D J Lederer, K Meyer, K Milewski, Y Suzuki, R J Shah, J M Diamond, N J Meyer, J W Tobias, D A Baldwin, V M Van Deerlin, K M Olthoff, A Shaked, J D Christie, CTOT Investigators

Abstract

We hypothesized alterations in gene expression could identify important pathways involved in transplant lung injury. Broncho alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was sampled from donors prior to procurement and in recipients within an hour of reperfusion as part of the NIAID Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation Study. Twenty-three patients with Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) were frequency matched with controls based on donor age and recipient diagnosis. RNA was analyzed using the Human Gene 1.0 ST array. Normalized mRNA expression was transformed and differences between donor and postreperfusion values were ranked then tested using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Three-hundred sixty-two gene sets were upregulated, with eight meeting significance (familywise-error rate, FWER p-value <0.05), including the NOD-like receptor inflammasome (NLR; p < 0.001), toll-like receptors (TLR; p < 0.001), IL-1 receptor (p = 0.001), myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (p = 0.001), NFkB activation by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (p = 0.001), TLR4 (p = 0.008) and TLR 9 (p = 0.018). The top five ranked individual transcripts from these pathways based on rank metric score are predominantly present in the NLR and TLR pathways, including IL1β (1.162), NLRP3 (1.135), IL1α (0.952), IL6 (0.931) and CCL4 (0.842). Gene set enrichment analyses implicate inflammasome-mediated and innate immune signaling pathways as key mediators of the development of PGD in lung transplant patients.

© Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment Design
Figure 2. Most significantly enriched gene sets
Figure 2. Most significantly enriched gene sets
The top portion of the plot shows the running enrichment score (ES) for the gene set from decreasing values of the rank list. The score at the peak of the plot (the score furthest from 0.0) is the ES for the overall gene set. The middle portion of the plot shows where the members of the gene set appear in the ranked list of genes. The bottom portion of the plot shows the value of the ranking metric as the list of ranked genes decreases in value. The ranking metric measures an individual transcript’s correlation with the PGD phenotype.
Figure 2. Most significantly enriched gene sets
Figure 2. Most significantly enriched gene sets
The top portion of the plot shows the running enrichment score (ES) for the gene set from decreasing values of the rank list. The score at the peak of the plot (the score furthest from 0.0) is the ES for the overall gene set. The middle portion of the plot shows where the members of the gene set appear in the ranked list of genes. The bottom portion of the plot shows the value of the ranking metric as the list of ranked genes decreases in value. The ranking metric measures an individual transcript’s correlation with the PGD phenotype.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel