Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Douglas W Blayney, Ramon Mohanlal, Hryhoriy Adamchuk, Dmitry Valikovich Kirtbaya, Michael Chen, Lihua Du, Stephan Ogenstad, Greg Ginn, Lan Huang, Qingyuan Zhang, Douglas W Blayney, Ramon Mohanlal, Hryhoriy Adamchuk, Dmitry Valikovich Kirtbaya, Michael Chen, Lihua Du, Stephan Ogenstad, Greg Ginn, Lan Huang, Qingyuan Zhang

Abstract

Importance: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested.

Objective: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel.

Design, setting, and participants: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021.

Interventions: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety.

Results: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim.

Conclusions and relevance: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin's same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim's next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Blayney reported receiving grants to his institution from BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, which also provided travel and lodging support during the conduct of the study, and grants to his institution from Amgen Inc and personal fees from G1 Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co Inc, and Eli Lilly and Company and owning stock in Madora and Artelo Biosciences Inc outside the submitted work. Dr Mohanlal reported being a stockholder in BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study and being coinventor on a patent with BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals. Dr Ginn reported statistical consulting for BeyondSpring Inc during the conduct of the study. Dr Huang reported owing stock in BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study, having a patent issued for plinabulin use in reducing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), and having a patent pending for plinabulin reducing CIN in various chemotherapy agents. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Disposition of Study Patients
Figure 1.. Disposition of Study Patients
ITT indicates intention to treat.
Figure 2.. Outcomes by Time and Treatment…
Figure 2.. Outcomes by Time and Treatment Group in the Intention to Treat and Safety Analysis Sets
A, Semilog plot of the mean absolute neutrophil count in cycle 1 for the intention to treat analysis. B, Plot of the mean patient reported bone pain score in cycle 1 in the safety analysis.
Figure 3.. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by…
Figure 3.. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Severity Grade
Grades are given in the Methods section.

References

    1. Pizzo PA. Management of fever in patients with cancer and treatment-induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(18):1323-1332. doi:10.1056/NEJM199305063281808
    1. Dinan MA, Hirsch BR, Lyman GH. Management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: measuring quality, cost, and value. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(1):e1-e7. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2015.0014
    1. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. . Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1589-1597. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163
    1. Aarts MJ, Peters FP, Mandigers CM, et al. . Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis during the first two cycles only or throughout all chemotherapy cycles in patients with breast cancer at risk for febrile neutropenia. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(34):4290-4296. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.6229
    1. Burris HA, Belani CP, Kaufman PA, et al. . Pegfilgrastim on the same day versus next day of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, non–small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of four multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase 2 studies. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(3):133-140. doi:10.1200/JOP.091094
    1. Martín M, Seguí MA, Antón A, et al. ; GEICAM 9805 Investigators . Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2200-2210. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0910320
    1. Nabholtz JM, Riva A. Taxane/anthracycline combinations: setting a new standard in breast cancer? Oncologist. 2001;6(suppl 3):5-12. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.6-suppl_3-5
    1. Lee J, Lee JE, Kim Z, et al. . Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients undergoing TAC chemotherapy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018;94(5):223-228. doi:10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.223
    1. Masuda N, Tokuda Y, Nakamura S, Shimazaki R, Ito Y, Tamura K. Dose response of pegfilgrastim in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(10):2891-2898. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2654-4
    1. Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, et al. . Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):727-731. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727
    1. Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. . Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(6):903-909. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf130
    1. Crawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer. 2004;100(2):228-237. doi:10.1002/cncr.11882
    1. Tonra JR, Lloyd GK, Mohanlal R, Huang L. Plinabulin ameliorates neutropenia induced by multiple chemotherapies through a mechanism distinct from G-CSF therapies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020;85(2):461-468. doi:10.1007/s00280-019-03998-w
    1. Blayney DW, Huang L, Mohanlal RW. A comparison of CD34+ mobilization effects of standard dose pegfilgrastim (Peg) versus low-dose peg combined with plinabulin. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl 15):e20000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e20000
    1. World Medical Association . World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
    1. Aagaard T, Roen A, Reekie J, et al. . Development and validation of a risk score for febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy in patients with cancer: the Fence score. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2(4):pky053. doi:10.1093/jncics/pky053
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23(2):129-138.
    1. Cleeland CS. The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide. MD Anderson Cancer Center; 2009.
    1. Bedard G, Zeng L, Zhang L, et al. . Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014;10(2):109-117. doi:10.1111/ajco.12070
    1. Phillips R, Gandhi M, Cheung YB, et al. . Summary scores captured changes in subjects’ QoL as measured by the multiple scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(8):895-902. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.011
    1. EORTC Quality of Life Group : The EORTC QLQ-C30 Manuals, Reference Values and Bibliography Brussels. EORTC Quality of Life Unit; 2002.
    1. van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, et al. . Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708-715. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
    1. Cassidy MR, Wolchok RE, Zheng J, et al. . Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with outcome during ipilimumab treatment. EBioMedicine. 2017;18:56-61. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.029
    1. Lalani AA, Xie W, Martini DJ, et al. . Change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in response to immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):5. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0315-0
    1. Kashyap AS, Fernandez-Rodriguez L, Zhao Y, et al. . GEF-H1 signaling upon microtubule destabilization is required for dendritic cell activation and specific anti-tumor responses. Cell Rep. 2019;28(13):3367-3380.e8. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.057
    1. Blayney DW, Shi Y, Adamchuk H, et al. . Clinical trial testing superiority of combination plinabulin (Plin) and pegfilgrastim (Peg) versus peg alone in breast cancer treated with high-risk febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy (chemo): final results of the phase 3 protective-2 in chemo-induced neutropenia (CIN) prevention. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):533. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.533
    1. Crawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R, et al. . Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(3):164-170. doi:10.1056/NEJM199107183250305

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel