A Randomized Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming with Guadecitabine and Carboplatin in Platinum-resistant, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Amit M Oza, Ursula A Matulonis, Angeles Alvarez Secord, John Nemunaitis, Lynda D Roman, Sarah P Blagden, Susana Banerjee, William P McGuire, Sharad Ghamande, Michael J Birrer, Gini F Fleming, Merry Jennifer Markham, Hal W Hirte, Diane M Provencher, Bristi Basu, Rebecca Kristeleit, Deborah K Armstrong, Benjamin Schwartz, Patricia Braly, Geoff D Hall, Kenneth P Nephew, Simone Jueliger, Aram Oganesian, Sue Naim, Yong Hao, Harold Keer, Mohammad Azab, Daniela Matei, Amit M Oza, Ursula A Matulonis, Angeles Alvarez Secord, John Nemunaitis, Lynda D Roman, Sarah P Blagden, Susana Banerjee, William P McGuire, Sharad Ghamande, Michael J Birrer, Gini F Fleming, Merry Jennifer Markham, Hal W Hirte, Diane M Provencher, Bristi Basu, Rebecca Kristeleit, Deborah K Armstrong, Benjamin Schwartz, Patricia Braly, Geoff D Hall, Kenneth P Nephew, Simone Jueliger, Aram Oganesian, Sue Naim, Yong Hao, Harold Keer, Mohammad Azab, Daniela Matei

Abstract

Purpose: Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been studied as carboplatin resensitizing agents in ovarian cancer. This randomized phase II trial compared guadecitabine, a second-generation HMA, and carboplatin (G+C) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Patients and methods: Patients received either G+C (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 s.c. once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS).

Results: Of 100 patients treated, 51 received G+C and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to G+C. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs. 9.1 weeks in the G+C and TC groups, respectively; P = 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the G+C group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P = 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in G+C and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the G+C group.

Conclusions: Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of G+C versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in G+C treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01696032.

©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1.. Disposition of subjects in the…
Figure 1.. Disposition of subjects in the trial.
AUC indicates the target area under the concentration-versus-time curve.
Figure 2.. Survival of subjects assigned to…
Figure 2.. Survival of subjects assigned to G+C arm versus TC arm.
A: Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival with the G+C treatment and TC regimens. B: Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival with the G+C treatment and TC regimens. For subjects in the TC group who crossed over to receive G+C, OS time was censored at the crossover time point.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel