Cumulative genetic risk predicts platinum/taxane-induced neurotoxicity

Sarah McWhinney-Glass, Stacey J Winham, Daniel L Hertz, Jane Yen Revollo, Jim Paul, Yijing He, Robert Brown, Alison A Motsinger-Reif, Howard L McLeod, Scottish Gynaecological Clinical Trials Group, Sarah McWhinney-Glass, Stacey J Winham, Daniel L Hertz, Jane Yen Revollo, Jim Paul, Yijing He, Robert Brown, Alison A Motsinger-Reif, Howard L McLeod, Scottish Gynaecological Clinical Trials Group

Abstract

Purpose: The combination of a platinum and taxane are standard of care for many cancers, but the utility is often limited due to debilitating neurotoxicity. We examined whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from annotated candidate genes will identify genetic risk for chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity.

Patients and methods: A candidate-gene association study was conducted to validate the relevance of 1,261 SNPs within 60 candidate genes in 404 ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum/taxane chemotherapy on the SCOTROC1 trial. Statistically significant variants were then assessed for replication in a separate 404 patient replication cohort from SCOTROC1.

Results: Significant associations with chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity were identified and replicated for four SNPs in SOX10, BCL2, OPRM1, and TRPV1. The population attributable risk for each of the four SNPs ranged from 5% to 35%, with a cumulative risk of 62%. According to the multiplicative model, the odds of developing neurotoxicity increase by a factor of 1.64 for every risk genotype. Patients possessing three risk variants have an estimated OR of 4.49 (2.36-8.54) compared to individuals with 0 risk variants. Neither the four SNPs nor the risk score were associated with progression-free survival or overall survival.

Conclusions: This study shows that SNPs in four genes have a significant cumulative association with increased risk for the development of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity, independent of patient survival.

©2013 AACR.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study design, including SNP QC and the narrowing number of SNPs per stage, in addition to patient characteristics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between genotype risk score (0–2 vs 3–4) and (A) incidence of neurotoxicity (+/− 2 standard errors), (B) progression free survival (p=0.75) or (C) overall survival (p=0.54) in the full dataset.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel